Thanks, I did see the Salutin column. He raises some interesting points about McGuinty's wonky moral compass.Of course you and Rockslinger are entirely ignoring the effect of deliberately reducing class sizes—generally considered a good thing—has on such numbers. Whether you achieve better ratios by retaining teachers as enrollment shrinks, or by new hires, or by some of each it will skew the numbers because it will be more expensive.
So is owning a car compared to transit. But I imagine you and Rocky would both say the extra cost gives me what I want. The over-populated classrooms McG inherited after the mindless cost-cutting and tax-cutting that packed them sure weren't giving us what we wanted.
BTW: Mf-2, as a newspaper reader (and borderline Dalton-obsessive) you might enjoy today's column by Rick Salutin. Nothing on the political front, but intriguing to read a playwright's take on the drama. You do have to wonder the hows and whys of the lame-duck with nothing left to lose just walking away instead of sitting down and at last doing and saying stuff that politics makes impossible for anyone with a future in it.
I'm not so sure reducing class sizes is such a good thing. It's popular, but there are doubts about whether it does any good. Certainly, when Malcolm Gladwell spoke at the Ontario Liberals' idea-fest (or whatever it was called) a couple of years ago, he wasn't a fan. The Liberal audience was rather stunned when Gladwell said the reductions in class sizes in Ontario weren't nearly significant enough to have any impact on the quality of education provided.