There is 1 south African that they need to look into and deport.
Couple deported
- Thread starter stinkynuts
- Start date
If you were looking for my opinion, you should've just asked instead of trying to imply I said that.
But if ICE has something on her, then she can go back to Korea, its not a big deal. Its not that they're sending her back to some backwards country. But she's a resident, not a citizen, she was not smart.
And a few immigrant wives they should check on.
Don't worry, I never look for your opinion.
The US is importing Israeli police state, apartheid tactics.
Its one thing to support genocide but its another thing to turn the country fascist to protect a foreign country and its war crimes.
fine
More on the latest student trump wants to deport.
If you allow them to stay, you continue to advertise to people around the world that America will accept even if you enter illegally so you incentivize more illegal immigration. This has been the status quo for decades and it must end.
The next couple that has been in the US illegally for 2 years will make the same case. "We're contributing and law abiding, we should be allowed to stay.".
Nothing changes. The US continues to have no border.
Do you see how that works?
Also, they're not being treated like violent criminals. That's a BS narrative you're pawning off. They're being treated like illegal immigrants. Mexico would kick you out of their country just the same. They do it to the countless illegals that cross their southern border every day.
At some point, someone in charge needs to make the tough decision to stop all of it. It's what real men do. They understand it'll be unpopular with many, and that some good people will be negatively impacted, but they know there is no alternative to right the ship.
Secondly, you cannot allow mass illegal nor mass LEGAL immigration as it not only creates cultural conflicts but it also results in dual allegiances. Which is a national security risk.
Those immigrants have no ties to the nation. They will not lay down their life for the US if the US was at war. They'd either fight alongside the enemy (if the enemy was Mexico), or they'd leave the US and go back to Mexico (if the enemy was any other powerful country on earth). Such immigrants are not citizens... they're residents, long-term vacationers, passers-by, leeches.
When in doubt, a nation errs on the side of caution.
There is historical precedent for this. In WW2, we put Japanese and German citizens in camps with the understanding that we didn't know whether they'd have more allegiance to their country of origin or their new nation.
Last edited:
The founding fathers didn’t write the constitution to have this lot destroy one its most revered principles.
Anyone paying attention in the future can ignore other reasoning Bucktee gives on the subject.
He's made the root position clear.
Please note that Bucktee considers Executive Order 9066 and Korematsu as positive goods.
ICE has always operated outside of the constitution and the american legal system, based on dealing 'illegal immigration'.
Its always been their mandate, the dems backed this as well.
The US just needs to get rid of ICE altogether, but in the meantime there is no easy way to stop it.
Its always been their mandate, the dems backed this as well.
The US just needs to get rid of ICE altogether, but in the meantime there is no easy way to stop it.
More than 65% of Canadians agree.
Further: "More than 80 per cent of newcomers to Canada feel the country is bringing in too many people through its immigration system"
We return to the 80/20 rule. You're on the 20% side, deep in minority territory, even amongst newcomers who are themselves a minority. Yet you somehow think your views are representative.
So making the claim that myself, 65% of Canadians, and over 80% of newcomers should be ignored is itself flawed reasoning.
We are the majority, so you ignore us at your own peril.
Not good. A necessary evil.
Ditto for dropping the bomb on Japan.
Last edited:
actually speaking out against Trump is now grounds for deportation in the US
I don't deny those numbers. (Even though you couldn't help to make a small edit to change the meaning, now could you?)
I am just pointing out that "we should have no LEGAL immigration" is your position and all other explanations you give on the subject should be understood in that context.
I didn't say you should be ignored.
I said other things you say to obfuscate your reasons should be ignored.
I'll let that stand there, then.
