Could Israel be behind these attacks

doggystyle99

Well-known member
May 23, 2010
7,900
1,210
113
Could this be an attempt by the Israeli regime to try to frame the Iranian regime for the bombings to win over support from other nations to attack Iran.
The bombs that were used were very similar to the ones used to kill the Iranian scientists.
Israel could have paid the MEK to carry out these attacks and blame it on the Iranian regime to gain an advantage on the international stage to further their war with Iran agenda?


http://counterpsyops.com/2012/02/17...aeli-supported-attacks-on-iranian-scientists/

http://news.antiwar.com/2012/02/16/...for-recent-bombings-despite-lack-of-evidence/
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0
Is the Pope German?
 

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,260
0
0
Just google 'Israel black flag' and think about it.

Its possible, Israel is working very hard to get the US in a war. Check this article on AIPAC's work on Al Jazeera:
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/02/2012218134736845243.html

Then remember the USS Liberty and you'd have to think it was possible.
Given that Iran doesn't seem to want a war at all, and its probably just as likely that it was Israel behind the attacks as Iran.
That said, I don't know either way and haven't heard enough credible reports from either side to pass judgement.
 

Perry Mason

Well-known member
Aug 20, 2001
4,682
208
63
Here
That said, I don't know either way and haven't heard enough credible reports from either side to pass judgement.
Are you changing your ways of thinking and reforming?

You seem to have had no problems in the past passing judgments without adequate or any information!

Perry
 

cye

Active member
Jul 11, 2008
1,381
3
38
Stop it don't confuse groggy with facts.
As an aside even the most incompetent Israeli agent wouldn't have blown off their own legs.
 

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,260
0
0
Now the fact that the terrorists in Thailand were definately Iranian. . . .
They were Iranian, but Thailand is reporting that they were MEK.
http://www.thailandnews.co/2012/02/bangkok-bomb-suspects-were-anti-iran-exiles/
http://www.infowars.com/thai-muslim-leader-mossads-mek-responsible-for-diplomat-attack/

Which would make the most reasonable explanation that this was an Israeli black flag event. Israel has been confirmed to be working with the MEK by NBC, so its quite possible that these MEK idiots were given booby trapped explosives. But at the very least, this would make it not an event carried out by the Iranian government, but an act by Iranian terrorists.
More then one article has noted that the weapons used in the last few attacks attributed to Iran have been the same magnetic bombs used by Israeli proxies, the MEK, in Iran.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,971
6,853
113
It's about as believable as the Iranian government knocking off their own scientists.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
I doubt it (but I've heard other people wonder this aloud), I'm sure the Bibi thinks this lets him play the victim if he decides to give the attack order.....

OTB
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,260
0
0
That is not an accurate statement Groggy. It is the leader of Shia Muslims in Thailand, (a minority of a minority) who made the statements you cite.

Does the head of Scientology in Canada speak for the Government?
Are you comparing Muslims with the church of Scientology?
Now that's amusing.

Lets wait and see where the reports go, shall we?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Groggy he was just pointing out that you were being deceptive, as usual. Thailand has not said what you claimed Thailand has said.
 

Perry Mason

Well-known member
Aug 20, 2001
4,682
208
63
Here
Are you comparing Muslims with the church of Scientology?
Now that's amusing.
Your interpretation of what he said is much more amusing for what it says about you: you are losing your marbles!

Perry
 

cye

Active member
Jul 11, 2008
1,381
3
38
Translation he was comparing your use of a very minor figure and giving it the same importance as if it came from an official government spokesmen. It is like calling a match an incendiary explosive device , a distortion of significance.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,197
10,484
113
Toronto
He said:


How does that not imply he is comparing Muslim to Scientology?
He was using it as an example of how remote your source was to the government of Thailand as a quote from Scientology would be to the Canadian government.

If you couldn't have figured that out on your own, you actually are as stupid as fuji states.
 

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,260
0
0
He was using it as an example of how remote your source was to the government of Thailand as a quote from Scientology would be to the Canadian government.

If you couldn't have figured that out on your own, you actually are as stupid as fuji states.
Now he could have picked Mennonite or some other small religious group if he really meant that, but by using Scientology his implication was that Thai Shia Muslim are wacko. It wouldn't pass the sniff test in any PC debate.

In any event, its minor.
The larger question is was this an Israeli/MEK event, which we'll probably just have to wait on.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,197
10,484
113
Toronto
The larger question is was this an Israeli/MEK event, which we'll probably just have to wait on.
If that is the larger question, then you should have used a more credible source if you wished it to be taken seriously. A Muslim news source (officially representing Thailand as you wanted to believe) regarding Israel in this case is as credible as Scientology, or if you prefer Mennonites representing the U.S. It makes no difference. Your spinmeistering did not work and only goes to further show how disingenuous you really are.
 

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,260
0
0
If that is the larger question, then you should have used a more credible source if you wished it to be taken seriously. A Muslim news source (officially representing Thailand as you wanted to believe) regarding Israel in this case is as credible as Scientology, or if you prefer Mennonites representing the U.S. It makes no difference. Your spinmeistering did not work and only goes to further show how disingenuous you really are.
First, it wasn't a Muslim news source, it was the Bangkok Post. Its a legit source.
Second, are you discounting this because it comes from a Muslim? Are you that blatantly racist?
Third, the take through the middle east is that there is no way that Iran would do something as stupid as to insult two of their larger trading partners, India and Thailand and insult their backers, Russia, but carrying out bombings in their countries.

As Dr Trita Parsi, the Iran hand at Johns Hopkins University and author of Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Iran, Israel and the United States argues, why would Iran do something so foolish as this and that too in New Delhi? It's an insult to the Iranian intelligence.

India is, after China, Iran's biggest trading partner and importer of Iranian oil. Besides, the two have shared a quiet partnership since the Russians left Afghanistan. It has even survived the Indian vote against Iran at the IAEA. Incidentally, Thailand is another major trading partner of the Islamic republic. So why would the Iranians choose the distant tourist paradise to settle scores with the Israelis, hurting their own interests?

The detention of an Iranian, who blew up his legs while handling the explosives, proves nothing. It's hardly a secret the Israelis and Americans have been using the Mujahideen-e-Khalq militants against Iran. As the West turns up the heat on Iran by way of economic sanctions, a trade blockade and crippling of its banks, coupled with the rising chatter of coming war, the region has been on a razor's edge for months now. All that is needed is a tiny spark to blow it all up. A minor skirmish here, a misunderstanding there or a perfect false flag in distant lands could prove excuse enough for a full-blown conflagration with catastrophic consequences.

That moment seems to have arrived with the incidents in India, Georgia and Thailand. Israel is desperately looking for a pretext to punish Iran. With the arrival of US election season and Europe being preoccupied with its economic mess, perhaps there cannot be a better time to do so. But it's easier said than done. Israel cannot do so on its own without US help. If it was doable, Israel would have done it by now. Iran is not Iraq.

Even though a demonstration of the capacity doesn't mean willingness, would you be terribly surprised if Tehran indeed goes for nukes? Given Israel's terrorising of the region over the past six decades and the West's hegemonic wars, it's actually tempting and makes sense to go for the comforting reassurance that nuclear weapons seem to provide.

More to the point, what right does Israel — and other world powers — have to lord over their nuclear arsenal while the rest of the world has to submit itself to IAEA scrutiny? If the international community is indeed serious about a nuke-free world, it has to first address this nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty duplicity. Nuclear weapons are a clear and present danger to the Middle East and the world, no matter who owns them.
http://gulfnews.com/opinions/columnists/israel-india-and-the-persian-puzzle-1.983197
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts