apparently he did, before the passengers were offThe captain needs to be forced to walk the plank.
he claims he brought it so close to shore to save * hiccup* passengersThe captain needs to be forced to walk the plank.
He will be credited with singlehandedly sinking the mega cruise boat industry.Italian Master Francesco Schettino
It should be possible, but it is going to be expensive and difficult - basically patches over the holes currently above water, then cables to scaffolds on the island to try to pull her to the point that patches can be put over the holes the ship is currently lying on, then trying to lighten her so that when she is pulled of the ledge she is currently on she doesn't rip out her bottom all over again.I'm curious if they will ultimately salvage this ship or is that even possible?
It would not be necessarily a bad thing at all were cruise liners to go back to more reasonable sizes.He will be credited with singlehandedly sinking the mega cruise boat industry.
Don't forget a name change.It should be possible, but it is going to be expensive and difficult - basically patches over the holes currently above water, then cables to scaffolds on the island to try to pull her to the point that patches can be put over the holes the ship is currently lying on, then trying to lighten her so that when she is pulled of the ledge she is currently on she doesn't rip out her bottom all over again.
I would presume that the Italian Government will insist upon something being done. Now if she will ever be put back into service is an entirely different question.
That's just after they spent $1.5 BILLION on "Oasis of the Seas", whose displacement is the same as the USN nuclear Nimitz class carrier.It would not be necessarily a bad thing at all were cruise liners to go back to more reasonable sizes.
I'm curious if they will ultimately salvage this ship or is that even possible?
coward...lolIt seems that there was a lot of (expected) confusion when the Costa Concordia was going down. In the old days, it used to be 'women and children first' when it came to evacuating a sinking ship, with the captain remaining until the end. We know the captain part doesn't seem to apply anymore. He is the first guy off the boat.
But what about women and children? For me, only my wife and children will go first. After that, I'm in, and everybody else had better take their chances. These days, when men are marginalized more and more, and equality is drummed into our heads (I have no problems with that), women will have to assume that role and wait their turn just like everybody else. Actually, I think we are at the point when it should be 'men and children first'. What do you guys think?
I hadn't heard that "captain is first guy off the boat" was now the correct evacuation protocol. Where did you hear this?In the old days, it used to be 'women and children first' when it came to evacuating a sinking ship, with the captain remaining until the end. We know the captain part doesn't seem to apply anymore. He is the first guy off the boat.
you call yourself a klingon? you are nothing but a bIHnuchIt seems that there was a lot of (expected) confusion when the Costa Concordia was going down. In the old days, it used to be 'women and children first' when it came to evacuating a sinking ship, with the captain remaining until the end. We know the captain part doesn't seem to apply anymore. He is the first guy off the boat.
But what about women and children? For me, only my wife and children will go first. After that, I'm in, and everybody else had better take their chances. These days, when men are marginalized more and more, and equality is drummed into our heads (I have no problems with that), women will have to assume that role and wait their turn just like everybody else. Actually, I think we are at the point when it should be 'men and children first'. What do you guys think?
That was in 1912 not 2012 !In the old days, it used to be 'women and children first' when it came to evacuating a sinking ship, with the captain remaining until the end.
That there have been a lot of very brave men over the years who actually did try to put women and children into the boats first. For some reason we tend to hear of the J. Bruce Ismay's but not of the John B. Thayer'sit used to be 'women and children first' when it came to evacuating a sinking ship. . . What do you guys think?