'Colonialism, apartheid and ethnic cleansing': UN rapporteur on Palestine blasts Isra

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,985
5,589
113
'Colonialism, apartheid and ethnic cleansing': UN rapporteur on Palestine blasts Israel


Published time: March 22, 2014 11:27
The UN Special Rapporteur on occupied Palestine accused Israeli authorities of conducting colonialist policies that constitute forms of apartheid and ethnic cleansing in the occupied territories in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Speaking at a news conference at the UN European headquarters in Geneva on Friday, the UN Special Rapporteur on occupied Palestine, Richard Falk, accused Israel of pushing Palestinians out of East Jerusalem and creating unbearable conditions for the minority to force them to immigrate.

Falk, an ethnic Jewish expert in international law and professor emeritus at Princeton University, told journalists that Israeli policies have “unacceptable characteristics of colonialism, apartheid and ethnic cleansing.”

In the present situation where talks between Israel and Palestinian authority remain in deadlock, the acceleration of Israeli settlement construction in the occupied territories is causing Palestinians to lose their faith that a state of their own could ever be created.

“Every increment of enlarging the settlements, or every incident of house demolition is a way of worsening the situation confronting the Palestinian people and reducing what prospects they might have as the outcome of supposed peace negotiations,” the UN Special Rapporteur said.
Speaking about Israel de facto annexing parts of the Palestinian territory, Falk was actually citing a report on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, prepared by his group and presented in January.

The report maintains that Israeli policies in the West Bank are effectively denying the Palestinian right to self-determination by means of “apartheid and segregation.”

“To sustain indefinitely an oppressive occupation containing many punitive elements also seems designed to encourage residents to leave Palestine, which is consistent with the apparent annexationist, colonialist and ethnic-cleansing goals of Israel, especially in relation to the West Bank, including East Jerusalem,” the report said.

For that purpose, the Israelis use bureaucratic processes, such as “revocation of residency permits, demolitions of residential structures built without Israeli permits (often virtually impossible to obtain), and forced evictions of Palestinian families,” which is a definite violation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, said the report.

In Jerusalem alone, over 11,000 Palestinians had lost their right to live in the city since 1996, only because Israel has been imposing residency laws in favor of Jews, making it possible to revoke Palestinian residence permits, Falk reported.

“The 11,000 is just the tip of the iceberg because many more are faced with possible challenges to their residency rights,” he said.

Along with the eviction of the Arab population from Jerusalem, Israel is actively constructing new settlements to "change the ethnic composition" of East Jerusalem, Falk said.

Israel captured both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as a result of the so-called Six-Day War in the Middle East in 1967. Captured East Jerusalem was later annexed as part of Israel’s indivisible capital, though this move has never been recognized internationally.

At the same time Palestinians are trying to establish a state of their own in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the only land left to them as of now. The capital of their state they plan to put in occupied East Jerusalem.

Palestinians refuse to recognize the state of Israel in its present borders, whereas Israel says Palestinian refusal serves the main obstacle to the creation of Palestinian statehood.

Israel has consistently denied any allegations of persecuting Palestinians, shifting the blame on their Palestinian opponents, they accuse of anti-Israeli violence that is permanently disturbing the peace in the Jewish state.


This week US President Barack Obama addressed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, pointing out the necessity to break the stalemate with Israel before the deadline for a framework deal, initiated by the US Secretary of State John Kerry, expires on April 29.

According to Professor Richard Falk, any peace negotiations between Israel and Palestinians are usually undermined by the sharp rise of Israeli settlement activities. At the same time the general attitude of the Israeli political establishment towards direct peace negotiations with Palestinians has suffered a serious change, Falk noted, as many Israelis are now seeing even entering such negotiations as betrayal of their national interests.

"A few years ago it would be hard to imagine that there was something to the right of [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu,” Falk said, pointing out that as of today a gradual shift to the right has taken place. "And there is a strong internal Israeli opposition to any sense that the Palestinian people, in any diminished way, deserve a state of their own,” he concluded.

In the face of the end of his six-year term as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights, Richard Falk is expected to address the UN Human Rights Council on Monday, before the body names his successor.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
This wasn't news the first time he reported on it and little has changed.

It took this long for RT to report as new news on something G&G brought up for discussion months ago. Try to keep up DM, will you?

This report was a parting shot by Richard Falk, a well documented anti-semite. It's not surprising at its tact.

He's the same guy that blames Israel and the US for the Boston Marathon bombing.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,734
3,013
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,749
3
0
A major problem is the crazy things other UN Special Rapporteurs have said. Given this, a UN Special Rapporteur could say that it is currently raining or snowing and I'd run outside to check before taking action on it.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Richard Falk.

Lol.


You have to be an idiot to take either him or the UNHRC seriously. He is a kook.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
A major problem is the crazy things other UN Special Rapporteurs have said. Given this, a UN Special Rapporteur could say that it is currently raining or snowing and I'd run outside to check before taking action on it.
Falk is seriously nuts, he is a 911 conspiracy theory but among other things.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,985
5,589
113
From children, drunks and crazy people you hear the truth.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,985
5,589
113
A major problem is the crazy things other UN Special Rapporteurs have said. Given this, a UN Special Rapporteur could say that it is currently raining or snowing and I'd run outside to check before taking action on it.
Standard approach by you and Fuji: If you cannot refute the message, attack the messenger.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
Standard approach by you and Fuji: If you cannot refute the message, attack the messenger.
Especially easy when the messenger has for a long documented history of being. Then we have you C&P stuff from RT and expecting it to be taken as serious balanced journalism.
 

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,259
0
0
Especially easy when the messenger has for a long documented history of being. Then we have you C&P stuff from RT and expecting it to be taken as serious balanced journalism.
He is still the UN rapporteur, though not for much longer as his term is up.
His word is still that of the UN.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
He is still the UN rapporteur, though not for much longer as his term is up.
His word is still that of the UN.

You tried this tact a couple of times before and it didn't fly. What's that classic definition of insanity again? He's a reporter, not a spokesman.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
And you tried this a few times and it didn't go anywhere.

Falk's last report is due Monday.

The question next will be who replaces him.
You don't know? clearly you don't have your finger on the pulse as well as you think you do.

http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-...ofessor-lead-candidate-to-replace-Falk-341257

US international law professor lead candidate to replace Falk

02/12/2014


The leading candidate to replace UN investigator on human rights in the Palestinian territories Richard Falk is American international law professor Christina Cerna, the Human Rights Council announced on Wednesday.


It published a shortlist of three candidates, which it whittled down first from 10 and then from five.


The other two candidates on the shortlist are Christine Mary Chinkin of the United Kingdom and John Cerone from the US.


A final appointment for a six-year term to the post of UNHRC special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories will only be made on March 28.


But already in its announcement Wednesday, the UN’s Consultative Group for the UNHRC said that Cerna had their “unanimous support.”


Falk, a professor emeritus from Princeton University, whose six-year term expires this year, was a particularly contentious rapporteur, with the US and Canada calling for his dismissal. Even before he was appointed in 2008, he made waves by comparing Israelis to Nazis.


The consultative group noted that they liked that Cerna had not taken a public stand on the conflict.


The group is composed of ambassadors from five countries: the Republic of Korea, Morocco, Lithuania, Peru and Canada.


It explained that in its initial review process of the candidates, Cerna had “demonstrated not only an understanding of the various human rights issues at play and a realistic appreciation for the challenges that a mandate holder may face, but was also the most likely to be able to objectively engage the key interested parties, having not previously taken public positions on issues relevant to the mandate.”


In her application essay, Cerna said that she was born in Germany to a Nicaraguan father stationed there for the US army and to a mother from the former Yugoslavia.


Raised as a Catholic, she grew up in a Jewish section of Washington Heights in Manhattan.


“I have always been interested in Israel and the occupied territories, and visited for the first time in 1970 with students from my law school. I have returned twice since then,” Cerna wrote.


Her views about occupation, she said, were shaped by Cambodia, Iraq and Afghanistan.


“To my surprise, the Cambodian people who had suffered a genocidal experience under Pol Pot were more interested in getting rid of their Vietnamese occupiers than trying the members of the Khmer Rouge,” she wrote.


The same is true in Iraq and Afghanistan, she said.


“The populations of those countries do not wish a residual presence to remain once the military troops are pulled out.”


“Occupation brings with it humiliation and anger and can only be relieved when the occupier departs,” she wrote.


According to the UN, Cerna chairs the International Human Rights Law Committee of the International Law Association. She recently retired from the Organization of American States, where she was a human rights specialist.


Chinkin, who almost made the shortlist in 2008, is a lawyer and a professor of international human rights law at the London School of Economics and Political Science.


She has served on past fact-finding for the UNHRC on Israeli military activity in Gaza, including the 2009 Goldstone Report.


Cerone, the third name on the list, is a professor of international law at the New England School of Law in Boston.


Author and activist Phyllis Bennis, who has written extensively on the conflict and is a supporter of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israel, was not one of the three finalists, even though she had been on the first shortlist of five candidates.


The final candidate is picked by UNHRC President Baudelaire Ndong Ella, the ambassador of Gabon, according to council spokesman Rolando Gomez. He said the council would be appointing 19 rapporteurs on March 28, including one for the Palestinian territories.


In total the UNHRC has 37 rapporteurs, of which 15 are for specific countries. But Israel is the only country to which a rapporteur is permanently assigned. On its website, the council states that the position is active until “the end of the Israeli occupation.”


The mandate itself limits the investigator to only examine Israeli actions against Palestinians over the pre-1967 lines, and does not seek information on Palestinian violation of human rights against either Israel or its own people.


Hillel Neuer, executive director of Geneva-based nongovernmental organization UN Watch, said that even Falk had complained the mandate was one-sided.

You might want to check this

http://www.unwatch.org/cms.asp?id=5135575&campaign_id=63111
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
He is still the UN rapporteur, though not for much longer as his term is up.
His word is still that of the UN.

His word is NOT the word of the UN, liar. He reports TO the UN. He does NOT speak for the UN. The UN has never endorsed any of his reports.

He is an obscure, biased employee appointed by a body that has no legitimacy. UNHRC has no credibility whatsoever.

No doubt the UNHRC is busily satisfying itself that whoever replaces him will be suitably biased. I am sure that the interview process included things like "do you believe Israel practices apartheid" and anyone who says no gets removed from the short list.
 

gryfin

New member
Aug 30, 2001
9,632
0
0
You don't know? clearly you don't have your finger on the pulse as well as you think you do.

http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-...ofessor-lead-candidate-to-replace-Falk-341257

US international law professor lead candidate to replace Falk

02/12/2014


The leading candidate to replace UN investigator on human rights in the Palestinian territories Richard Falk is American international law professor Christina Cerna, the Human Rights Council announced on Wednesday.

It published a shortlist of three candidates, which it whittled down first from 10 and then from five.

The other two candidates on the shortlist are Christine Mary Chinkin of the United Kingdom and John Cerone from the US.


A final appointment for a six-year term to the post of UNHRC special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories will only be made on March 28.


But already in its announcement Wednesday, the UN’s Consultative Group for the UNHRC said that Cerna had their “unanimous support.”


Falk, a professor emeritus from Princeton University, whose six-year term expires this year, was a particularly contentious rapporteur, with the US and Canada calling for his dismissal. Even before he was appointed in 2008, he made waves by comparing Israelis to Nazis.


The consultative group noted that they liked that Cerna had not taken a public stand on the conflict.


The group is composed of ambassadors from five countries: the Republic of Korea, Morocco, Lithuania, Peru and Canada.


It explained that in its initial review process of the candidates, Cerna had “demonstrated not only an understanding of the various human rights issues at play and a realistic appreciation for the challenges that a mandate holder may face, but was also the most likely to be able to objectively engage the key interested parties, having not previously taken public positions on issues relevant to the mandate.”


In her application essay, Cerna said that she was born in Germany to a Nicaraguan father stationed there for the US army and to a mother from the former Yugoslavia.


Raised as a Catholic, she grew up in a Jewish section of Washington Heights in Manhattan.


“I have always been interested in Israel and the occupied territories, and visited for the first time in 1970 with students from my law school. I have returned twice since then,” Cerna wrote.


Her views about occupation, she said, were shaped by Cambodia, Iraq and Afghanistan.


“To my surprise, the Cambodian people who had suffered a genocidal experience under Pol Pot were more interested in getting rid of their Vietnamese occupiers than trying the members of the Khmer Rouge,” she wrote.


The same is true in Iraq and Afghanistan, she said.


“The populations of those countries do not wish a residual presence to remain once the military troops are pulled out.”


“Occupation brings with it humiliation and anger and can only be relieved when the occupier departs,” she wrote.


According to the UN, Cerna chairs the International Human Rights Law Committee of the International Law Association. She recently retired from the Organization of American States, where she was a human rights specialist.


Chinkin, who almost made the shortlist in 2008, is a lawyer and a professor of international human rights law at the London School of Economics and Political Science.


She has served on past fact-finding for the UNHRC on Israeli military activity in Gaza, including the 2009 Goldstone Report.


Cerone, the third name on the list, is a professor of international law at the New England School of Law in Boston.


Author and activist Phyllis Bennis, who has written extensively on the conflict and is a supporter of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israel, was not one of the three finalists, even though she had been on the first shortlist of five candidates.


The final candidate is picked by UNHRC President Baudelaire Ndong Ella, the ambassador of Gabon, according to council spokesman Rolando Gomez. He said the council would be appointing 19 rapporteurs on March 28, including one for the Palestinian territories.


In total the UNHRC has 37 rapporteurs, of which 15 are for specific countries. But Israel is the only country to which a rapporteur is permanently assigned. On its website, the council states that the position is active until “the end of the Israeli occupation.”


The mandate itself limits the investigator to only examine Israeli actions against Palestinians over the pre-1967 lines, and does not seek information on Palestinian violation of human rights against either Israel or its own people.


Hillel Neuer, executive director of Geneva-based nongovernmental organization UN Watch, said that even Falk had complained the mandate was one-sided.

You might want to check this

http://www.unwatch.org/cms.asp?id=5135575&campaign_id=63111
Given these quotes from the article you provided, it doesn't look good for Israel. Her views seem quite consistent with Falk's on Israel's occupation.

“To my surprise, the Cambodian people who had suffered a genocidal experience under Pol Pot were more interested in getting rid of their Vietnamese occupiers than trying the members of the Khmer Rouge,” she wrote.

The same is true in Iraq and Afghanistan, she said.

“The populations of those countries do not wish a residual presence to remain once the military troops are pulled out.”

“Occupation brings with it humiliation and anger and can only be relieved when the occupier departs,” she wrote.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts