My comment's mostly about what Christie Blatchford had to say, quoted above: Yup. It's sad and shameful that we've had to establish entire organizations — more than one in fact — just to remind young people of the reality their parents didn't teach them: That free speech can only exist where people behave as if there is mutual respect and all viewpoints are reasonable, because everyone understands their responsibility to support what they advance by reason, not emotion or coercion. We used to call it common courtesy, back in the days when more people talked about such stuff more often.Well, I remembered reading this and it squares with what my younger friends who attend universities are in fact telling me....
I think it's more about how universities have started to become too accommodating to a very small number of students who take offense at everything.
But here's the thing, imho, I have the right to offend you.
Anyway, here it is.....
Recently, I had occasion for the first time to be in a recognized “safe space,” that egregious term that generally seems to mean a place where the most delicate among us can vent without any fear of correction or challenge and then be supported up the yin-yang.
It was a panel discussion about the Jian Ghomeshi case held last Friday night at the University of Toronto.
Organized by the University of Toronto Men’s Issues Awareness Society (UTMIAS), a registered campus group, and sponsored by the Canadian Association for Equality (CAFE), the discussion featured two lawyers (David Butt and Richard Litkowski) and me.
The evening itself was fun and spirited.
My fellow panellists are smart, the audience was informed (a show of hands showed that about half had actually read Ontario Court Judge Bill Horkins’ decision acquitting Ghomeshi), Robert Samery, the chair of CAFE, had plenty of coffee on hand, and being Canucks, we were all exceedingly polite, except for me (I swore, but only twice).
What was grating, however, was the 10-minute introductory spiel, wherein several members of UTMIAS and CAFE gently reminded everyone that we were in a safe space, of their belief in fair and equal treatment for everyone, of the need for peaceful and civilized discussion, of the value of the human rights of everyone, of the approach to be taken (inclusive, diverse and affirming) and that the university’s “policy on disruption of meetings” was in effect.
And, as at least two speakers proudly mentioned, these forums were “models for how sensitive topics can be discussed” because “apart from universities,” there are few spaces where such things can be freely kicked around.
Apart from universities? Are you kidding me? Universities are the last places I’d look for vigorous debate, least of all on sensitive topics.
Link to rest:
http://nationalpost.com/opinion/chr...ns-really-so-fragile-that-we-need-safe-spaces
Better pull your helmet on tight kids, it's going to be a bumpy ride in the so called real world.
Back then we naively thought all civilized space was safe, or was getting there. But that was long before 'Lock her up' became an accepted level of 'debate'. There have always been thuggish hooligans and cry-babies and there always will be. But the rest of us — the grown-ups — have to decide what we want our society to be: Civilized or barbarous.