Climate Change

I am not a climate scientist and whether there would be any changes I cannot say. But you do not have to be an alarmist to see that something is going on and it is not good.


we are still emerging from an ice age
does the fact that it is mother nature & not mankind's doing, make it acceptable?
 
Lets say the climate experts are right and earth warms up another 2 celsius over the next 45 years.
Heck, lets take the worst case scenario and say earth warms up 5 degrees C over the next 45 years.

Antarctica is currently -31C. And dont forget its summer there now.
See here: https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/antarctica

So even a 5 degree celsius warming is only going to reduce the temperature there to about -26 celsius.
How in the hell is that going to melt the south pole?? It defies common sense.
Earth would have to warm about 30 degrees before the whole thing melts.
And since earth has only warmed 1.5 degrees since industrial age started in 1900, its literally impossible for earth to warm more than another 5 degrees.

Then add to that Canada's winters have hardly warmed up either.
I've lived in Toronto for the past 30 years and unfortunately winters have barely changed.
Every year its the same shitty, cold winter.

Unless I'm missing something, global warming is an exaggerated pile of bullshit.

Just my $0.02


Antarctica holds 90% of the planets ice, and 70% of the freshwater
The Antarctic Ice Sheet measures nearly 4.9 kilometers (3 miles) at its thickest point and contains about 30 million cubic kilometers (7.2 million cubic miles) of ice.
It is frozen 99% of the time.
it is not going to melt anytime soon
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil C. McNasty
we are still emerging from an ice age
does the fact that it is mother nature & not mankind's doing, make it acceptable?
No, unacceptable either way. It's the part about being only Mother Nature that's a complete load of shit:poop:!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter
You must hate your kids
Says the guy who attempted to peddle a story about Antarctica having palm trees and conveniently leaves out the part about the history of the continent and plate tectonics.
Instead he tries to echo the bs that if climate change continues at the current rate, there could be palm trees there again in the future.
Just because you're being played doesn't mean you have to indoctrinate others.

gondwana.jpg


https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/support...go,single large continent called Gondwanaland.
 
Says the guy who attempted to peddle a story about Antarctica having palm trees and conveniently leaves out the part about the history of the continent and plate tectonics.
Instead he tries to echo the bs that if climate change continues at the current rate, there could be palm trees there again in the future.
Just because you're being played doesn't mean you have to indoctrinate others.

gondwana.jpg


https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/support/gondwana.jsp#:~:text=Some 200 million years ago,single large continent called Gondwanaland.


Allow me to introduce you to a new word, paleontology.
 
Allow me to introduce you to a new word, paleontology.
Not really sure what you are trying to distract to this time but here's a better word: Paleoclimatology

Third atmosphere
The constant rearrangement of continents by plate tectonics influences the long-term evolution of the atmosphere by transferring carbon dioxide to and from large continental carbonate stores.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleoclimatology


So the question for you is how much carbon tax do we need to pay to keep the continents from moving?
 
  • Like
Reactions: K Douglas and Skoob
Not really sure what you are trying to distract to this time but here's a better word: Paleoclimatology

Third atmosphere
The constant rearrangement of continents by plate tectonics influences the long-term evolution of the atmosphere by transferring carbon dioxide to and from large continental carbonate stores.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleoclimatology


So the question for you is how much carbon tax do we need to pay to keep the continents from moving?

Next you need to learn about climatology.
If you read the reports you'd understand and wouldn't ask questions like that.
 
Next you need to learn about climatology.
If you read the reports you'd understand and wouldn't ask questions like that.
In other words you're stumped and want to distract.
Epic fail...
I did mention you're being played right?
Right.
 
Its amazing that anyone can think climate change is happening these days.
You need to be very special.
Shouldn't you be investing in a palm tree farm in Antarctica with all the extra carbon tax rebate cash you've stashed away?
 
No, unacceptable either way. It's the part about being only Mother Nature that's a complete load of shit:poop:!!!


really?

have much understanding of geological history do ya?

the planet is still emerging from an ice age
where you are sitting use to be under a mile of ice
did you think the climate change propaganda machine turned that natural process off ?

hmm......, lets see,....... millions of years of ice age cycles, millions of cubic miles of ice frozen & thawed multiple times..........vs. a 0.01% change in atmospheric composition by a saturated inert colorless, odorless gas?

mankind can no more control the climate, than he can control the tides

no need to call what you do not understand shit.
it makes for a poor reflection on you