Let AI do the selecting. With the only consideration being merit. This should eliminate imperfect human biases.Implicit in group bias and cultural familiarity.
People aren't perfect.
Let AI do the selecting. With the only consideration being merit. This should eliminate imperfect human biases.Implicit in group bias and cultural familiarity.
People aren't perfect.
Now that is a novel idea I can get behind.Let AI do the selecting. With the only consideration being merit. This should eliminate imperfect human biases.
Except that AI is a reflection on its programmers.Let AI do the selecting. With the only consideration being merit. This should eliminate imperfect human biases.
Doesn't your tweet prove my point?Except that AI is a reflection on its programmers.
Musk had to fix this problem recently.
How they "feel" is subject to their biases. A machine does not feel. It simply looks for the information it is programmed to. Program it to select the best candidate based on merit.Detractors may argue that how they "feel" about a candidate is just as important.
That is what I mean that detractors would disagree with the AI suggestion.How they "feel" is subject to their biases. A machine does not feel. It simply looks for the information it is programmed to. Program it to select the best candidate based on merit.
You obviously know nothing about AI. AI is not programmed as much as it is trained with output from human-generated data. If an AI ranks a face with blue eyes as more attractive it is not that the AI is programmed to give blue eyes a higher score, it is the data they are trained on is human rankings and biases about faces which includes an attraction to blue eyes.How they "feel" is subject to their biases. A machine does not feel. It simply looks for the information it is programmed to. Program it to select the best candidate based on merit.
They do. Every employer must hire at least one Chinese person.I may be mistaken, but I don't think China has DEI policies. Food for thought.
But you're not ranking based on faces in this case. You're ranking based on proficiency in computer science.You obviously know nothing about AI. AI is not programmed as much as it is trained with output from human-generated data. If an AI ranks a face with blue eyes as more attractive it is not that the AI is programmed to give blue eyes a higher score, it is the data they are trained on is human rankings and biases about faces which includes an attraction to blue eyes.
By scanning databases, which quite often are the web. So they end up reflecting the bias around them.You obviously know nothing about AI. AI is not programmed as much as it is trained with output from human-generated data. If an AI ranks a face with blue eyes as more attractive it is not that the AI is programmed to give blue eyes a higher score, it is the data they are trained on is human rankings and biases about faces which includes an attraction to blue eyes.
That sounds like a terrible idea.Let AI do the selecting. With the only consideration being merit. This should eliminate imperfect human biases.
You clearly have no clue what DEI is.Without DEI you'd just hire white people, even if black lesbians were the best candidate.
MAGA needs DEI, they can't compete on an open field.
I may be mistaken, but I don't think China has DEI policies. Food for thought.
That would just be more 1% trying to make more money by paying people less through 'free trade'. The disappearance of those jobs is part of why the MAGA base is scared of losing their jobs. Fortunately those same 1% have convinced MAGA that its not those jobs leaving the country that's the problem its that people of colour want fair work.Here's athought for you to ponder.
If an American job were taken by a Chinese person... would that br a DEI hire?
No. That would be Google hiringHere's athought for you to ponder.
If an American job were taken by a Chinese person... would that br a DEI hire?
Once in a while, there is real market disruption coming out of the open source model. The biggest one was Linux back in the 90`s.I don't think this kind of news report is true, it's always something we hear about once, about it being the absolute best, then nothing. In my opinion that's to catch some millionaire's investments.
AI is still too problematic and too prone to 'halucinations'.Once in a while, there is real market disruption coming out of the open source model. The biggest one was Linux back in the 90`s.