Did they have slavery in the last couple of hundred years?I may be mistaken, but I don't think China has DEI policies. Food for thought.
I don't know. What does that bear on winning the AI race in the 21st century?Did they have slavery in the last couple of hundred years?
What has DEI policy to do with the AI race?I don't know. What does that bear on winning the AI race in the 21st century?
Everything. You can hire the best and the brightest, without other considerations, like DEI. If every one of the best and brightest turns out to be a black lesbian, so be it.What has DEI policy to do with the AI race?
You can hire the best and the brightest even with those considerations.Everything. You can hire the best and the brightest, without other considerations, like DEI.
Without DEI you'd just hire white people, even if black lesbians were the best candidate.Everything. You can hire the best and the brightest, without other considerations, like DEI. If every one of the best and brightest turns out to be a black lesbian, so be it.
Or you can not do that, and watch someone else beat you in the race.
Then why would you need those considerations? Just hire the best and brightest and be done with it.You can hire the best and the brightest even with those considerations.
No, you would not. You would hire the best candidates. Period. Because you're trying to win the AI race.Without DEI you'd just hire white people, even if black lesbians were the best candidate.
Because the best and the brightest would be passed over for someone that is straight, male and caucasian.Then why would you need those considerations?
Why would you do that, if you're trying to win an AI race with China? Why would you shackle yourself by passing over the best and brightest? Seems stupid to me.Because the best and the brightest would be passed over for someone that is straight, male and caucasian.
What gets me is when the Tech Billionaires need half a trillion dollars, There it is. What's the justification?Seems like the norm.
That's not what happens, without DEI its like the Shaq said.No, you would not. You would hire the best candidates. Period. Because you're trying to win the AI race.
2 reasons.Why would you do that, if you're trying to win an AI race with China? Why would you shackle yourself by passing over the best and brightest? Seems stupid to me.
Is that why they have all these Asian tech bros in AI? Because they only want white men?That's not what happens, without DEI its like the Shaq said.