After he left Cuba he became a bit of a joke.
Not that I love the guy, but the propaganda posted on my hotel wall said that he left Cuba to continue the revolution.
After he left Cuba he became a bit of a joke.
Not that I love the guy, but the propaganda posted on my hotel wall said that he left Cuba to continue the revolution.
If you don't know much about Che...then I wonder why you choose to comment.
Why because all throughout history the so called white man has proven to be a liar, murderer and thief. Take John Brown for instance son of an abolitionist who plan to invade the south and free the slaves. Certain textbooks take a neutral approach to John Brown, not explaining why he became a hero to so called blacks and nonslaveholding so called whites. Now other textbooks make him out to be insane, mentally ill, deranged, gaunt, grim, terrible, and crackbrained. Most readers grew up reading that Brown was a fanatic if not crazed.
Governor Wise of Virinia called him "a man of clear head" after an informal interview with Brown.
But to the historians of that time his insanity was not psychological it was idealogical. To make no sense is to be crazy. Times haven't changed much, history certainly does repeat itself.
Why because all throughout history the so called white man has proven to be a liar, murderer and thief. Take John Brown for instance son of an abolitionist who plan to invade the south and free the slaves. Certain textbooks take a neutral approach to John Brown, not explaining why he became a hero to so called blacks and nonslaveholding so called whites. Now other textbooks make him out to be insane, mentally ill, deranged, gaunt, grim, terrible, and crackbrained. Most readers grew up reading that Brown was a fanatic if not crazed.
Governor Wise of Virinia called him "a man of clear head" after an informal interview with Brown.
But to the historians of that time his insanity was not psychological it was idealogical. To make no sense is to be crazy. Times haven't changed much, history certainly does repeat itself.
I hear what your saying and like i said before i'm not saying that their aren't devils in these other nations as well, just remember one thing who or what nation of people control the world? The UN is made up of all so called white nations. The powers that be are predominantely white. Throughout history what nation of people have been responsible for the majority of genocide?
Now i know so called black on black crime is rampant, you have to remember this is due to 400 years of oppression, colonizing, playing the people against eachother...divide and conquer is how they do this.
A great book i'm reading right now is Lies My Teacher Told Me by James W. Loewen. You should check it out.
My friend the truth is the truth, i can't deny that.
These people are beneficiaries of their ancestors, who raped robbed and murdered and to this day goes on under the guise of democracy...yay
Let's approach it this way. It is not the truth that all white men and liars, murders and thieves.
You are just spewing racist blather.
Che was a good man.
Take a breath will ya and think. White man?
As opposed to Idi Ami, Robert Mugabi, Jean Bedel Bokassa, Omar al-Bashir, Teodoro Obiang Nguema, or Paul Biya. none of these heads of state are very white and are considered among the worst dictators/leaders in the world. I cite only personalities from one continent, but could expand my list to other areas of non white population if you'd like.
Let's approach it this way. It is not the truth that all white men and liars, murders and thieves.
You are just spewing racist blather.
I think you'll find that most of the nations in the UN are not white led nations. Approximately half of the G20 are in the same boat. If you consider Latino led nation non white as some might, the numbers skew even more drastically.
So is it not true that so called white people are benefiting from their ancestors who committed many atrocious acts.
If you like Stalinists who kill without trials, oppose democratic elections who really were not good at what they did...