Carolyn Parrish Does it Again
- Thread starter n_v
- Start date
Hey
Peeping Tom and Tompeepin,
Could you guys decide who gets to keep the name and the other switch, those of us with dyslexia are dieing.
Dyslexics Untie!
OTB
Peeping Tom and Tompeepin,
Could you guys decide who gets to keep the name and the other switch, those of us with dyslexia are dieing.
Dyslexics Untie!
OTB
You should be able to tell us apart. I am on the left and he is on the right. Just reverse your order!onthebottom said:
TP,
I thought maybe you were Schizophrenic.
Got it, he's right and you're wrong (I'm ashamed, that was too easy)
OTB
I thought maybe you were Schizophrenic.
Got it, he's right and you're wrong (I'm ashamed, that was too easy)
OTB
I'm not sure how proportional representation would help. Under proportional representaton parties submit lists of people who will be their MPs. If a party gets 20% of the vote, the top 20% of names on its list are elected. If they get 30%, the top 30 on their list get elected. Under such a system, I am not sure how getting rid of her would be easier if she was on the party's list.tompeepin said:The liberals should kick her out. No other party would accept this idiot. Well maybe the Bloc.
Time for proportional representation. Instead of keeping liabilities in a party for mere political reasons.
I just meant that it would not matter in a minority situation under proportional representation like it will hurt the Liberals now that they have less seats than the opposition combined.someone said:
The Liberals would have booted her a long time ago in a majority situation.
I just had to make a plug for proportional representation.
Yes I am out of my mind.onthebottom said:
But probably not in that way.You should be ashamed and this is the least of the reasons why. heheheonthebottom said:
That pretty much sums it up. besides I got here first ...
tompeepin said:You should be able to tell us apart. I am on the left and he is on the right. Just reverse your order!
