this?Imagine sitting with Johnny at a bar, fawk, I'd keep a cap on my beer the entire time, fearing Johnny's spit balls flying everywhere as he's nonstop ranting away.
or this
Carney skipping Quebec French Debate
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
or this
I think many Canadians don't know the whole story and reason why Poilievre won't get the security clearance. Do you not agree with Tom Mulcair's take on the matter? If so, why do you think Mulcair is wrong?Large majority of Canadians believe Pierre Poilievre should get his security clearance
According to a new study by the Angus Reid Institute, 7 in 10 Canadians (69%) agree that all federal party leaders should get their security clearance, including Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre, who has failed to do so.
Liberal (89%), NDP (81%) and Bloc Québécois (75%) voters are those most likely to agree with the sentiment. A plurality of Conservatives (44%) say the same.
“Pierre Poilievre has resisted calls to receive the security clearance necessary to read classified materials related to foreign interference. The Conservative leader contends that this would prevent him from speaking freely about these issues, while Liberal leader and Prime Minister Mark Carney has called his decision irresponsible. NDP leader Jagmeet Singh previously stated that he believes Poilievre’s unwillingness to get his security clearance is ‘disqualifying’ for his pursuit of leading the nation as prime minister.”
This is the second study that finds Canadians largely in agreement that security clearance should be sought by all federal party leaders.
The Angus Reid Institute conducted an online survey from March 28 to 31, 2025 among a representative randomized sample of 2,131 Canadian adults who are members of Angus Reid Forum.
PeePee won't get clearance because his leadership campaign relied on Indian money.
IDU.
Singh read the report, he has clearance.
Well if PeePee won't step down, Canadians will vote him out.
This is hardly a step down moment. There's two sides to every story. Not that I expect anyone who hates Poilievre will read this.
The NP makes a good case for, nothing to see here. Note the timing of this "breaking" story.
"The Globe story was published nearly three years after Poilievre won the leadership, more than three months after the CBC story was published and two months after the January foreign interference report was made public."
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/ca...y-smears-poilievre-with-carney-talking-points
And if PeePee is losing, he'll turn to cheating, if Blundell is correct, and he is likely wrong.
Like he did at the leadership convention.
(stuff like this is why the xitter is still useful)
We've been over this ad nauseum on here...The leftists are a really daft lot.
If he gets elected Prime Minister watch how fast he gets this clearance.
Last edited:
At least when he loses his seat he'll have the biggest pension.
Bummer he'll have to say bye to the free government mansion and servants.
Everybody should ask themselves why The CCP wants the Liberals in power in Canada so much?
Thanks for posting the link.
The CCP isnt even trying to hide it anymore lol. Bewildering to me how blatant corruption and foreign interference run through the liberal party but blind hatred for the other side gives them an excuse to ignore it.
what is the cost of extreme weather events? What is the cost of insurance against the ravages of extreme weather? What direction are those costs going? Up up and away! You are the foremost misleading bullshit propagandist.
we have always had extreme weather events
you are a misinformed fool
What the IPCC Actually Says About Extreme Weather
What the IPCC Actually Says About Extreme Weather
I promise, you'll be utterly shocked
Roger Pielke Jr.
Jul 19, 2023
so shadup and apologize
What a stupid argument.we have always had extreme weather events
you are a misinformed fool
What the IPCC Actually Says About Extreme Weather
What the IPCC Actually Says About Extreme Weather
I promise, you'll be utterly shocked
Roger Pielke Jr.
Jul 19, 2023
so shadup and apologize
The IPCC predicts change and notes what they have high confidence about and low confidence. That's a strength of their predictions, not a weakness.
That is part of the scientific method you hate.
it is not a stupid argument.
The IPCC has concluded that a signal of climate change has not yet emerged beyond natural variability for the following phenomena:
- River floods
- Heavy precipitation and pluvial floods
- Landslides
- Drought (all types)
- Severe wind storms
- Tropical cyclones
- Sand and dust storms
- Heavy snowfall and ice storms
- Hail
- Snow avalanche
- Coastal flooding
- Marine heat waves
you would not know the scientific method if it ran you over,
you are a high school drop out
You want the IPCC to be able to predict exactly how many more landslides there will be and if they can't then you think they are useless?
That's idiotic.
When you boil a pot of water you can accurately predict when it will boil, you will not be able to accurately predict where the first bubble will be.
What we care about is that adding CO2 and greenhouse gases is increasing the global temperature and the amount of chaos into the climate.
Remember the time you said that if climate change is happening it would be the greatest crime against humanity?
We are now committed to 3ºC warming with 4ºC likely by the end of the century, which will doom most of humanity.
Congrats on being complicit.
Oh sure, how can you believe anything that right-wing rag publishes.
Of course the CCP and Trump want Carney to win. That should tell you something right there.
you can not seem to comprehend simple English
as they aways have been and always will be
Are you claiming they made no projections with 'high confidence'?
Why won't you list them?
We could all use Johnny's pearls of wisdom.Imagine sitting with Johnny at a bar, fawk, I'd keep a cap on my beer the entire time, fearing Johnny's spit balls flying everywhere as he's nonstop ranting away.
Indian interference, does this mean that Andrew Scheer grovelling before Narendra Modi achieved something? Seriously this underscores how important Canada is becoming on the world stage. I have a hunch that Germany and France have also lobbied their 0.02 cent into the campaign.
