Captain Marble is a toxic feminist

[icespot]

Jesus!
I'm not a big fan of toxic feminism either, and will call it out when I see it.
But come the fuck on. This is being way overblown.

Scenes get shot and cut all the time. It was possibly thought of as funny, an attempt to get another comedic bit in the movie. Obviously upon later review they thought it didn't suit the character or the story, so they cut it. That's what happens in movies.

And that body language analysis video was the biggest load of shit I ever saw. I was literally laughing at her analysis when watching it. That woman obviously has no idea about the concept of sarcastic banter, and friendly jibes. "She was looking down on the man in the White Jacket to establish her dominance." How about his eye line was physically below hers.

For God's sake, it's shit like this that makes people laugh at people on the Right.

Does toxic feminism exist? Yes.
Should it be fought against when it happens? Yes.
Was this an example of such? Fuck no!

As Conservatives can we please stay in the lane, and stop veering off into the ditch with such banal tripe.

Will state it again, had the scene been left as it was, no issue. What set off the whole thing was this....


"Get an EXCLUSIVE first look at @BrieLarson taking on toxic masculinity (in the form of @RobertKazinsky) in this extended #CaptainMarvel scene”

Then the toxic feminist articles that follow praising her behaviour, and how movies should show more of this. There are shit loads of them.

I am farther to the left than Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama, anti Trump, and big supporter of socialist initiatives.

But like many men and women had it with this robots that wish the world was free of men. Their stupidity goes to the level that they regret being mother's to male son's. Like wtf is wrong with this women.

Also I'll state it again, there are many wonderful feminist that fight for equal opportunity, who also want nothing to do with toxic feminist. But sadly the press only prints the stories from men hating robots.

As for the video you are absolutely right, it's fucking retarded, total bullshit, really glad you point it out, because that is exactly what toxic feminist videos of the same kind do. Only that they do it to males, happens all the time when female politicians meet their male counterparts.

See how stupid it is, but most people only see it in the role reversal. When it's done by toxic feminist to demonstrate a man or men being dominant towards a woman, then the sheep and press are all over it, printing how bad men are.

How many times have they done this stupidity to Trump, and I hate the fucker. Here is how toxic feminist describe a male touch:

"Invading the other person’s personal space to show dominance. This might even be followed by touch, such as patting the person on the back or holding an arm, indicating ownership of that person. Research shows that when a man touches a woman, it may not be necessarily due to affection; instead it could be an expression of ownership and domination."

So some one turned the tables and used it on Larson, it's stupid there and it's stupid when it is done to men interacting with women. We are all different and you can do an analysis, but has to be based on the person's observed behaviour, not general rules applied to all.

 

[Uncharted]

Will state it again, had the scene been left as it was, no issue. What set off the whole thing was this....


"Get an EXCLUSIVE first look at @BrieLarson taking on toxic masculinity (in the form of @RobertKazinsky) in this extended #CaptainMarvel scene”

Then the toxic feminist articles that follow praising her behaviour, and how movies should show more of this. There are shit loads of them.

I am farther to the left than Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama, anti Trump big supporter of socialist initiatives.

But like many men and women had it with this robots that wish the world was free of men. Their stupidity goes to the level that they regret being mother's to male son's. Like wtf is wrong with this women.

Also I'll stated again, there are many wonderful feminist that fight for equal opportunity, who also want nothing to do with toxic feminist. But sadly the press only prints the story for men hating robots.

As for the video you are absolutely right, it's fucking restarted, total bullshit, really glad you point it out, because that exactly what toxic feminist videos of the same kind do. Only that they do it for males, happens all the time when female politicians meet their male counterparts.

See how stupid it is, but most people only see it in the role reversal. When it's done by toxic feminist to demonstrate a man or men being dominant, then the sheep and press are all over it.

How many times have they done this stupidity to Trump, and I hate the fucker. Here is how toxic feminist describe a male touch:

"Invading the other person’s personal space to show dominance. This might even be followed by touch, such as patting the person on the back or holding an arm, indicating ownership of that person. Research shows that when a man touches a woman, it may not be necessarily due to affection; instead it could be an expression of ownership and domination."

So some one turned the tables and used it on Larson, it's stupid there and it's stupid when it is done to men interacting with women. We are all different and you can do an analysis, but has to be based on the person's observed behaviour, not general rules applied to all.

But presenting the clip that way was USA Today's doing.
The responses to such are the preview of the individuals responding.
Not Marvel Studios.
Not the Director.
Not Bree Larson, (who does have her own SJW issues by the way) but that is not what is happening here.

Blaming them for the way a cut scene was presented and responded to by another media company is beyond the pale. Which is what you are doing in your original Post. You are never seeing another Captain Marvel Movie again, because of what USA Today did? How was that the Marvel's fault?
Give your head a shake.

 

[icespot]

Thank you.



But Icespot, keep fighting the good fight. Seriously. Just make sure.you equally try to combat male toxicity or you are nothing more than a Hypocrite.

By the way, I was the first to call out the feminist Gillette ad that helped proved the male version of the ad that had everyone up in arms was actually a very anti-male ad, scolding men on how to behave and men were right in their opinions of it. I call out extreme male and female toxicity. At least I try to. I just don't see it here.

I will not fight male toxicity, because women are strong and independent and fully capable of fighting it, but I will always be next to them fully supporting their fight.

And if I ever see you fighting that fight, I will be next to you fully supporting your initiative. Because, I will be in full agreement with you.

We want a world that gives equal opportunity, once we do that, nature took care of handing out talents without discrimination. Which means will see the numbers be more equal.

We need each other, both men and women.

 

[icespot]

But presenting the clip that way was USA Today's doing.
The responses to such are the preview of the individuals responding.
Not Marvel Studios.
Not the Director.
Not Bree Larson, (who does have her own SJW issues by the way) but that is not what is happening here.

Blaming them for the way a cut scene was presented and responded to by another media company is beyond the pale. Which is what you are doing in your original Post. You are never seeing another Captain Marvel Movie again, because of what USA Today did? How was that the Marvel's fault?
Give your head a shake.

I gave my head a shake, and you are right. I had no issue with the scene, until it was used by toxic feminist for their own SJW, and because they used her real name, Larson, not Captain Marble, they gave it the notion that it was Larson supporting it. When after you pointed this out to me, you are right. Larson had nothing to do with it.

So depending what road they take on the next movie, I will be there. I actually enjoyed the movie very much and so did my kids.

Just like Captain Marble, I made the mistake of blaming the wrong bad guy.

 

[Uncharted]

I gave my head a shake, and you are right. I had no issue with the scene, until it was used by toxic feminist for their own SJW, and because they used her real name, Larson, not Captain Marble, they gave it the notion that it was Larson supporting it. When after you pointed this out to me, you are right. Larson had nothing to do with it.

So depending what road they take on the next movie, I will be there. I actually enjoyed the movie very much and so did my kids.

Just like Captain Marble, I made the mistake of blaming the wrong bad guy.

Don't get me wrong. Captain Marvel was the worst movie in the franchise for many other reasons.

Mostly the absolute disregard for established continuity already established in the MCU regarding Fury's Eye, just for a stupid comedic gag.
But the treatment of the Carol Danvers Character as well.

She had such a rich history in the comics, making her one of the most textured characters to be potentially introduced in the MCU.
This history of what she has gone through, and her overcoming it, is what made her such a strong character, and potentially the best one for a female lead movie.
Instead she was presented as bland and one dimensional, tapping little to nothing of the that rich history that made her so great in the comics.
They pretty much dropped the ball in writing her character.

Due to this, Bree had almost nothing to work with, which is why she seemed to just phone in her performance.

Captain Marvel could have been so much better than Wonder Woman as a film, instead it was only marginally better. And that improvement had nothing to do with the main character, as it should have, but instead the supporting characters, which is sad.

 

[basketcase]

The Terminators are evil robots designed to destroy humans. They follow mission protocols and don't know what they are doing is wrong.

Captain Marvel, is supposed to be good, someone to lookup to, the guy is a idiot, but he didn't deserve what happened.

Do a role reversal and then you will see the problem, for example what if Thor had broken a woman's hand when they were checking him out.

There have been tons of articles from toxic feminist, wishing this happen more often. ...

...When you don't understand that these are stupid movies made for entertainment value and money, not part of an agenda being pushed on you...

 

[Jasmine Raine]

I gave my head a shake, and you are right. I had no issue with the scene, until it was used by toxic feminist for their own SJW, and because they used her real name, Larson, not Captain Marble, they gave it the notion that it was Larson supporting it. When after you pointed this out to me, you are right. Larson had nothing to do with it.

So depending what road they take on the next movie, I will be there. I actually enjoyed the movie very much and so did my kids.

Just like Captain Marble, I made the mistake of blaming the wrong bad guy.

That is what I did not get.

There a men who cheer violence in movies that are done to males and females alike or some, incels for example, that cheer women being raped or killed.

I didn't see what someone else's "take" on the scene had to do with Bree or the movie itself.

That is why I brought up the Gillette ad. When the first male version came out with be the best man you can be, I didn't quite see the "agenda" that men were saying was being pushed. Because really, if you look hard enough you can always find something to complain about.

Once the female Gillette commercial came out which was all about empowering women, then men had the proof of the Gillette's actual take on both commercials. One where men are told all they do wrong and how they should be better and men should not be proud of themselves as men. Then one where women are told not to listen to anyone but themselves and what they want and be proud to be women.

Completely unequal messaging in those commercials by the same company under the same campaign. That is something to react to the actual company about.

This threw me for a loop because you can't blame Marvel for this. They cut the scene out. It was USA today that took it they way they did and ran with it.

If I was Marvel, I wouldn't be doing anything. People are talking about my movie. That is all I want when I create mindless entertainment and am not in the game of politics and bullshit.

 

[glamphotographer]

I get flak from MCU fanboys by saying that there was lack of chemistry between Captain Marvel and the other Avengers in the End Game. Clearly the main cast members did not like Brie Larson. That was the only criticism I have for the film.