Canucks player on leave after sexual misconduct allegation
The woman has spoken to Glacier Media and has identified the individual as Vancouver Canucks forward Jake Virtanen, 24.
www.nsnews.com
Do you believe Michael Jackson molested children?Note the incident took place 4 years ago. So why now ? Maybe to leverage a payout settlement ?
Do the(no longer) children believe they were molested? all the media hype never seems to get closer to the truth...Do you believe Michael Jackson molested children?
Sexual assault victims (I am one of them from my childhood) can take years to come forward to disclose.It took me 42 years to do so. He was charged convicted jailed. And I wasnt looking for a payout.Note the incident took place 4 years ago. So why now ? Maybe to leverage a payout settlement ?
If he was guilty it means he had a trial. So far that hasn't happened as far as I can see. And if he is guilty as found in a court of law then he gets what's coming. But if he's not guilty he still gets his reputation tarnished and career possibly ruined. In the NHL he becomes tainted goods and that is a dead end with his career either way. I'd say at this point he's fucked either way. Easy way in our current system for a jilted lover or anyone with a grudge to ruin someone in a high profile career even before trial. No disrespect Jenesis but my police contacts tell me that 50% of sexual assault cases don't make it to trial. Yours would be otherwise. The guy that assaulted you needs jail time when found guilty in a court of law.He is suspended while it’s investigated. If he was guilty then it would be much more than just suspended from playing. He’s still getting paid.
Thats the way that it works now.
A trial is only required for criminal prosecution. The NHL can conduct an investigation and have their own punishment.If he was guilty it means he had a trial. So far that hasn't happened as far as I can see. And if he is guilty as found in a court of law then he gets what's coming. But if he's not guilty he still gets his reputation tarnished and career possibly ruined. In the NHL he becomes tainted goods and that is a dead end with his career either way. I'd say at this point he's fucked either way. Easy way in our current system for a jilted lover or anyone with a grudge to ruin someone in a high profile career even before trial. No disrespect Jenesis but my police contacts tell me that 50% of sexual assault cases don't make it to trial. Yours would be otherwise. The guy that assaulted you needs jail time when found guilty in a court of law.
There is a serious issue though with thisSexual assault victims (I am one of them from my childhood) can take years to come forward to disclose.It took me 42 years to do so. He was charged convicted jailed. And I wasnt looking for a payout.
This does happened but it is a misconception at how much this actual happens. Sure you may not remember the colour buttons on the guys shirt but you remember the important details.There is a serious issue though with this
42 years later I am very skeptical of the truth being told
Vast majority of people can not remember that long (and with trauma it is even less likely)
I know it happens (esp with minors) but its not a good thing as regardless of payouts there is a serious issue with credibility
You can read the whole article but the conclusion (summary) is why credibility is at issueIt is media and defence lawyers that have you convinced there is a credibility issue the longer a person stays quiet.
I’m sorry but no article is going to tell me that I don’t remember my sexual assault from 2 years ago. You may not believe me. That is your choice but I know what happened. I remember what happened.You can read the whole article but the conclusion (summary) is why credibility is at issue
They state as a certainty that you would be incapable of having an accurate memory of the event
And these are not from shady defence lawyers (although the articles do comment on how easy it can be to trap/trick someone in an interview if focusing more on lie detection or inconsistencies)
PART III – How Trauma Affects Memory and Recall - The Impact of Trauma on Adult Sexual Assault Victims
The Impact of Trauma on Adult Sexual Assault Victimswww.justice.gc.ca
Memory Distortion for Traumatic Events: The Role of Mental Imagery - PMC
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
That is kind of the issue though...You simply can’t tell me I don’t remember. And I don’t think you can tell spankingman that he doesn’t remember either. You are not in our heads. You didn’t experience our trauma. How do you think you can tell us what we remember and how we remember it?
I did tell you what happened and you choose not to believe. You can’t tell me what happened because you were not there. Those are two very different things.That is kind of the issue though...
I can not tell you what happened
But you can not tell me what happened either
That is why I quoted directly from the justice.gc.ca
That is well researched by reputable psych doctors with millions in funding by our government
According to the article your brain would not be normal if you actually could remember after a trauma....
No disrespect Jenesis but my police contacts tell me that 50% of sexual assault cases don't make it to trial. Yours would be otherwise. The guy that assaulted you needs jail time when found guilty in a court of law.
I think there has to be a distinction though - if a woman admits to making a false claim then by all means she should be identified. However the proof of guilt is so difficult that someone found not guilty doesn't necessarily mean they are innocent either, just that proof of guilt could not be established sufficiently in court. To then identify a victim is unfair especially in a case against a celebrity who likely has the financial means to hire much better attorneys.It always confusing why the women are never identified regardless of the out come. Meanwhile the guy, regardless of out come, is hung out to dry.