I'm with you on those counts. Its a tough nut to crack, and I sure as heck don't have the solutions to global ineqalities, corporate greed, and market inefficiencies. Probably why I'm not on the short list for President of the US right now.shakenbake said:CapitalGuy;
I hear what you are saying. However, at what cost do we keep the borders open? What I am saying is that they have to play by the same rules as we play, or we have to change to play by their rules. That means, both sides looking after the environment and respecting human dignity. When they do that, I am comfortable with the globalisation that you are talking about.
As it is right now, don't you see that the CEOs are effectively raping and plundering the developing countries? Who is getting rich in such countries as India and China? The more important question to answer is, how can we ensure that the Hindus and Muslims and others who deserve to partake in the fruits of their hard work will realise these fruits, or, at least, part of the riches that they have produced? On the other side of the coin, I agree that the Western world needs a kick in the butt to improve itsw productivity and equity, as well.
I think the aim in the developing countries you mention is to create a middle class (of some sort), as this normally provides the basis for economic stability. There will be rich and poor, but if those countries can raise their standards to something approaching ours (or if we can lower our standards and meet them in the middle), I think we'll all be better off.
The problem I can't wrap my head around is that mother earth cannot sustain a population of 6 or 7 billion people, all living to North American/Western European standards.