Bring back the cold war, please.

But Danny, Russia has a nuclear arsenal and that big, big army and lots of tanks and they keep invading neighbouring countries like Georgia and Ukraine and killing the people there. What if they did that to Latvia? And Poland? And Germany?

Ukraines fascist govt is doing a great job killing its own people and destroying its own country. Don't tell me they are defending their territory. If that were true they should attack Crimea where Russia DEFINITELY is. Instead they are attacking Russian ethnics and destroying eastern Ukraine instead of seeking a political solution.
 
So do you agree with Latvia policy to keep generations of ethnic russians stateless ?

No matter how bad it is, it isn't a reason for a Russian invasion.

p.s. You don't see any problems with Lebanon keeping generations stateless. Whoops, hypocrisy.
 
You want to force them to live in a country they don't call home and don't want to live in?....

Based on polls I've seen, they don't want to be Israeli but you want to force them to become so.

Of course multiple Israeli peace offers included the option of some refugees and their descendants moving to Israel and the rest being funded to either stay in the country of their birth or move to a Palestinian state.
 
Lol. First russian latvians aren't refugees who were kicked out from their homeland and second they have no claim to return to Russia, they want to remain in Latvia. Huge difference

Yes, they were part of the organized Soviet Russification of Eastern Europe. But for some reason that doesn't bother you.
 
Ukraines fascist govt is doing a great job killing its own people and destroying its own country. Don't tell me they are defending their territory. If that were true they should attack Crimea where Russia DEFINITELY is. Instead they are attacking Russian ethnics and destroying eastern Ukraine instead of seeking a political solution.

Re hashing a dead horse. We "debated" this umpteen times in 2014 and 2015. Nice to know you're still there.
 
he told me that he was born an raised in Ukraine but doesn't consider himself Ukrainian because he feels Russian.
This is not that uncommon. My Romanian friend tells me that gypsies in Romania don't consider themselves Romanians.

When I tell people I'm Canadian. They ask: "but what are you really"? I tell them I am Sikh. They ask: "where is your turban"? I said I am Canadian Sikh.
 
Colonialism means foreign settlers having more rights than indigenous people.
That is also true in Northern Ireland until most recently (at least in law if not practice).

Yes most of Sikhs I have met do. Religion comes only second.
Interesting. I think many (most, almost all, all?) Sikhs want independence from India.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalistan_movement

P.S. The media in Canada usually if not always refer to the 4 cabinet ministers in PM Trudeau's cabinet as Sikhs.
 
Colonialism means foreign settlers having more rights than indigenous people. That wasn't the case in Soviet Latvia ...

You once again show your ignorance of actual history. The Soviets had an official policy of replacing ethnic groups with Russians. For example that is what also happened in Crimea where they deported the ethnic Tatars and replaced them with Russians. It happened in Kaliningrad where the forcibly removed all the Germans and replaced them with Russians. Ethnic culture in the Baltic wasn't seen to be as different so they only repressed them and brought in Russian colonists but didn't deport all of the ethnic groups. Latvian policy is recent and just swinging the hate the other direction.
 
And why do you say sikh and not East Indian ? Sikh is a religion not ethnicity

The Sikhs consider themselves a unique ethnic group. They have their own religion, own distinct historical background, and unique culture.
 
The Sikhs consider themselves a unique ethnic group. They have their own religion, own distinct historical background, and unique culture.
The Brits really fcuked up when they didn't give the Sikhs their own homeland after all the Sikhs did for the Brits.

The Brits and the French also really fcuked up when they didn't give the Kurds their own homeland.

The result is that 5 Sikh organizations and at least one Kurd organization are consider terrorist groups. People turn to "terrorism" when they are denied their independent homeland.
 
probably partition India in hundreds of separate entities as there are hundreds of different Gods worshiped in India.
Let the people decide in a peaceful vote. That is the decent and democratic way. The good people of Quebec, Scotland and most recently Northern Ireland have the right to self-determination. I think the Russians in East Ukraine and the Kurds should also have the same right.

BTW: I think the Sikhs and Kurds were promised their own homeland. A promise not fulfilled, yet.
 
If they want to establish their state in Punjab , they would have to ethnically cleanse hindus and muslims and keep very few of them to make sure it has a sikh majority state like Israel kept only 15% of palestinians to have a jewish majority state in 1948 and now Fuji and baskecase brag about those 15% left
Punjab itself was partitioned. Muslims got part and the part that was supposed to go to the Sikhs did not. A Sikh state would work as long as minority rights are respected.
 
Language can be one of criteria defining an ethnic group but definitely not religion. Sikhs are ethnically no different than other Punjabis

Palestinians are ethnically no different than other Arabs. The ONLY thing they have that distinguishes them is their conflict with Israel.