Toronto Girlfriends

Bono and his "One" Foundation

Questor

New member
Sep 15, 2001
4,549
1
0
In Canada, for example, an organization must submit an application for charitable status which must be approved by Revenue Canada, then submit an annual (very detailed) financial report. Since they haven't had their status revoked yet, I would guess that their paperwork has been in order for a few years now. That New Post article is a non-issue IMO, just a bit of "gotcha" journalism from a lowbrow misinformed tabloid "newspaper."
I think what is confusing everyone is the use of the word "foundation". I didn't read over the entire One Foundation web site, but I didn't see that it said anything about charitable status or charitable activities. In Canada anyway, the word "foundation" is often used to describe an organization with charitable status. I don't know what the regulations are in UK, but in Canada, advocacy activities by organizations with charitable status is strictly limited. Considering that advocacy is the primary activity and purpose of the One Foundation, I doubt very much that it has charitable status, at least in Canada and thus is not subject to its regulations.

Criticize One Foundation if you wish, but don't do it for not donating money to charitable organizations. That is not its purpose.
 

keepitup

New member
Sep 25, 2006
99
0
0
Say what you want about his politics and music but Bono is a humanitarian. He gives enormous time and money to his causes. That anyone would criticize someone with his level of fame and wealth for trying to help impoverished people in Africa is truly pathetic.
 

monocochino

New member
Oct 18, 2009
134
0
0
Say what you want about his politics and music but Bono is a humanitarian. He gives enormous time and money to his causes. That anyone would criticize someone with his level of fame and wealth for trying to help impoverished people in Africa is truly pathetic.
Humanitarian yes! But the argument is whether the enormous amount of money that goes into the "One" foundation is being distributed wisely??? And why can't he be criticized??? because of his level of fame and wealth??? LOL....what does that have to do with anything???
I'm a fan of Bono, musically and personally but if only 1 or 2% of this foundation is going to the needy than it is time to truly debate the cause!!!!
 

Questor

New member
Sep 15, 2001
4,549
1
0
Say what you want about his politics and music but Bono is a humanitarian. He gives enormous time and money to his causes. That anyone would criticize someone with his level of fame and wealth for trying to help impoverished people in Africa is truly pathetic.
Absolutely correct.
Maybe in Bono's mind the "One" is him....lol
In your case, I am sure we can disregard the above comment by keepitup, as undoubtedly you have contributed much more to the world than Bono, right?
 

D-Blue

Registered Loser
Jun 30, 2009
181
0
0
Wish I knew
Well nootieboy has the socialst we speak down pat.
Bonos' charity donated 1.2% of its gross revenue to charitable causes. That will get its charitable status yanked by both Revenue Canada and the IRS.
Perhaps you should check to see if One is a registered charity in Canada and the USA before jumping to this conclusion.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,490
1,361
113
Absolutely correct.

In your case, I am sure we can disregard the above comment by keepitup, as undoubtedly you have contributed much more to the world than Bono, right?
I can gurantee you I have taken less from it too.
 

Keebler Elf

The Original Elf
Aug 31, 2001
14,618
240
63
The Keebler Factory
They seem more like an advocacy organization- no mention of their purpose being to distribute funds to anyone. Maybe somebody should have done a little research before spouting off against someone who is using their fame for at least some good in the world...
Sounds like a fucking SCAM!!! Very convenient... give us $15 million but we don't have to be accountable for how it's spent because we only "advocate." Buuulllll-shit!!!
 

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
28,624
1,381
113
- FYI -

Did you know that it cost $4 to collect $1. There is an expense to the logistics of collecting money. Sometimes you will see collection boxes at retail cash registers in commercial stores soliciting donations. Sometimes it is for the poor, sometimes it is for the seeing or hearing impaired. The owners of these boxes are private people or companies that buy the right to place the boxes on commercial premise with the name of the charitable organization. They pay $1 a day for that right. Any extra money collected is profit and expense related to the manufacture of the box and collection of money from these boxes. No matter how much money is collected from these boxes, the organization represented will only get $1 a day.
 

Brill

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2008
8,679
1,192
113
Toronto
It's fine for "One" to use money to advocate changes and contribute to charities, but why not skip the middleman and give directly to the same causes?
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,490
1,361
113
LOL well that makes your positon quite clear. You are jealous of Bono and anyone who has been more successful than you.
Not at all, I think Bono is an incredible artist. One of my all time favourites and feel I have received good value from every U2 album I have bought. I just think his lobbying for aid is hypocritical as he does not put his vast sums of money where his mouth is.
 

keepitup

New member
Sep 25, 2006
99
0
0
Selfish, lazy asshole:

Humanitarian work
Bono with President Lula da Silva of Brazil in 2006

Bono has become one of the world's best-known philanthropic performers.[74][75] He has been dubbed, "the face of fusion philanthropy",[76] both for his success enlisting powerful allies from a diverse spectrum of leaders in government, religious institutions, philanthropic organisations, popular media, and the business world, as well as for spearheading new organizational networks that bind global humanitarian relief with geopolitical activism and corporate commercial enterprise.[77]

In a 1986 interview with Rolling Stone magazine, Bono explained that he was motivated to become involved in social and political causes by seeing one of the Secret Policeman's Ball benefit shows, staged by John Cleese and producer Martin Lewis for the human-rights organisation Amnesty International in 1979.[78] "I saw 'The Secret Policeman’s Ball' and it became a part of me. It sowed a seed..." In 2001, Bono arranged for U2 to videotape a special live performance for that year's Amnesty benefit show.

Bono and U2 performed on Amnesty's Conspiracy Of Hope tour of the United States in 1986 alongside Sting.[12] U2 also performed in the Band Aid and Live Aid projects, organised by Bob Geldof.[79] In 1984, Bono sang on the Band Aid single "Do They Know it's Christmas?/Feed the World" (a role that was reprised on the 2004 Band Aid 20 single of the same name).[80] Geldof and Bono later collaborated to organise the 2005 Live 8 project, where U2 also performed.[13]
Bono and U.S. President George W. Bush in 2006

Since 1999, Bono has become increasingly involved in campaigning for third-world debt relief and raising awareness of the plight of Africa, including the AIDS pandemic. In the past decade Bono has met with several influential politicians, including former United States President George W. Bush and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin.[81] During a March 2002 visit to the White House, after President Bush unveiled a $5 billion aid package, he accompanied the President for a speech on the White House lawn where he stated, "This is an important first step, and a serious and impressive new level of commitment. ... This must happen urgently, because this is a crisis."[81] In May of that year, Bono took US Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill on a four-country tour of Africa. In contrast, in 2005, Bono spoke on CBC Radio, alleging then Prime Minister Martin was being slow about increasing Canada's foreign aid.[82] He was a nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003, 2005, and 2006 for his philanthropy.[14][83][84]

In 2004, he was awarded the Pablo Neruda International Presidential Medal of Honour from the Government of Chile.[85] Time Magazine named Bono one of the "100 Most Influential People" in its May 2004 special issue,[86] and again in the 2006 Time 100 special issue.[87] In 2005, Time named Bono a Person of the Year along with Bill and Melinda Gates.[18] Also in 2005, he received the Portuguese Order of Liberty for his humanitarian work.[88] That year Bono was also among the first three recipients of the TED Prize, which grants each winner "A wish to change the world".[89] Bono made three wishes,[90] the first two related to the ONE campaign and the third that every hospital, health clinic and school in Ethiopia should be connected to the Internet. TED rejected the third wish as being a sub-optimal way for TED to help Africa[90] and instead organised a TED conference in Arusha, Tanzania. Bono attended the conference, which was held in June 2007, and attracted headlines[91] with his foul-mouthed heckling of a speech by Andrew Mwenda.
Bono at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, 2008.

In 2007, Bono was named in the UK's New Years Honours List as an honorary Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire.[17][92] He was formally granted knighthood on 29 March 2007 in a ceremony at the residence of British Ambassador David Reddaway in Dublin, Ireland.[93]

Bono also received the NAACP Image Award's Chairman's Award in 2007.[94] On 24 May 2007, the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia announced that Bono would receive the Philadelphia Liberty Medal on 27 September 2007 for his work to end world poverty and hunger.[95] On 28 September 2007, in accepting the Liberty Medal, Bono said, "When you are trapped by poverty, you are not free. When trade laws prevent you from selling the food you grew, you are not free, ... When you are a monk in Burma this very week, barred from entering a temple because of your gospel of peace ... well, then none of us are truly free." Bono donated the $100,000 prize to the organisation. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala accepted the award for the Washington-based Debt AIDS Trade Africa.[96]

In 2005 he recorded a version of Don't Give Up with Alicia Keys, with proceeds going to Keep a Child Alive.[97]

On 15 December 2005, Paul Theroux published an op-ed in the New York Times called The Rock Star's Burden (cf. Kipling's The White Man's Burden) that criticised stars such as Bono, Brad Pitt, and Angelina Jolie, labelling them as "mythomaniacs, people who wish to convince the world of their worth." Theroux, who lived in Africa as a Peace Corps Volunteer, added that "the impression that Africa is fatally troubled and can be saved only by outside help—not to mention celebrities and charity concerts—is a destructive and misleading conceit."[98] Elsewhere, Bono has been criticised, along with other celebrities, for "[ignoring] the legitimate voices of Africa and [turning] a global movement for justice into a grand orgy of narcissistic philanthropy.[99]

On 3 April 2005, Bono paid a personal tribute to John Paul II and called him "a street fighter and a wily campaigner on behalf of the world's poor. We would never have gotten the debts of 23 countries completely cancelled without him."[100] Bono spoke in advance of President Bush at the 54th Annual National Prayer Breakfast, held at the Hilton Washington Hotel on 2 February 2006. In a speech containing biblical references, Bono encouraged the care of the socially and economically depressed. His comments included a call for an extra one percent tithe of the United States' national budget. He brought his Christian views into harmony with other faiths by noting that Christian, Jewish, and Muslim writings all call for the care of the widow, orphan, and stranger. President Bush received praise from the singer-activist for the United States' increase in aid for the African continent. Bono continued by saying much work is left to be done to be a part of God's ongoing purposes.[11]

The organisation DATA (Debt, AIDS, Trade, Africa) was established in 2002 by Bono and Bobby Shriver, along with activists from the Jubilee 2000 Drop the Debt Campaign.[101] DATA aims to eradicate poverty and HIV/AIDS in Africa.[101] DATA encourages Americans to contact senators and other legislators and elected officials to voice their opinions.[101]

In early 2005, Bono, his wife Ali Hewson, and New York-based Irish fashion designer Rogan Gregory launched the socially conscious line EDUN in an attempt to shift the focus in Africa from aid to trade.[102] EDUN's goal is to use factories in Africa, South America, and India that provide fair wages to workers and practice good business ethics to create a business model that will encourage investment in developing nations.[103]
Bono after accepting the Philadelphia Liberty Medal on 27 September 2007.

Bono was a special guest editor of the July 2007 issue of Vanity Fair magazine. The issue was named "The Africa Issue: Politics & Power" and featured an assortment of 20 different covers, with photographs by Annie Leibovitz of a number of prominent celebrities, political leaders, and philanthropists. Each one showcased in the issue for their contributions to the humanitarian relief in Africa.[104]

In an article in Bloomberg Markets in March 2007, journalists Richard Tomlinson and Fergal O’Brien noted that Bono used his band's 2006 Vertigo world tour to promote his ONE Campaign while at the same time "U2 was racking up $389 million in gross ticket receipts, making Vertigo the second-most lucrative tour of all time, according to Billboard magazine. . . . Revenue from the Vertigo tour is funnelled through companies that are mostly registered in Ireland and structured to minimise taxes."[105]

Further criticism came in November 2007, when Bono's various charity campaigns were targeted by Jobs Selasie, head of African Aid Action. Selasie claimed that these charities had increased corruption and dependency in Africa because they failed to work with African entrepreneurs and grassroots organisations, and as a result, Africa has become more dependent on international handouts.[106] Bono responded to his critics in Times Online on 19 February 2006, calling them "cranks carping from the sidelines. A lot of them wouldn’t know what to do if they were on the field. They’re the party who will always be in opposition so they’ll never have to take responsibility for decisions because they know they’ll never be able to implement them."[107]

In November 2007, Bono was honoured by NBC Nightly News as someone "making a difference" in the world.[108] He and anchor Brian Williams had travelled to Africa in May 2007 to showcase the humanitarian crisis on the continent.[109] On 11 December 2008, Bono was given the annual Man of Peace prize, awarded by several Nobel Peace Prize laureates in Paris, France.[110]
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,490
1,361
113
When Bono asks govenments to donate, where do you think that money comes from? A money tree? Well if Bono wants me to chip in $25...lets see him chip in 100M... after all he will still be worth 150-300M AFTER donating 100M. I agree charity is destructive. we have sent money for decades and it has done little. Charity should only be dispensed in emergencies. We should wind it down.
 

mexican

New member
Apr 11, 2005
115
0
0
I find Bono and U2 to be very self serving. They make sure that no charitable act is not recorded by the press. They use it to market their albums around the world. Make no mistake it is a business and the charity angle is excellent marketing. There are many celebrities that do great work without having to play to the cameras. I find many of Bono's remarks patronizing and uniformed.

A great book on the waste and destructive results of charitable aid is called "Dead Aid" by Dambisa Moyo. She is an African economist and it is a very eye opening book.

Any analysis of U2's business practices will find that they have used every tax avoidance trick in the book. Why does the band not pay Irish taxes and instead use the Netherlands as their tax base. They are classic hypocrites.
 

keepitup

New member
Sep 25, 2006
99
0
0
I find Bono and U2 to be very self serving. They make sure that no charitable act is not recorded by the press. They use it to market their albums around the world. Make no mistake it is a business and the charity angle is excellent marketing. There are many celebrities that do great work without having to play to the cameras. I find many of Bono's remarks patronizing and uniformed.
So better to not use your fame and power to raise awareness of poverty and starvation? Because the Band may also benefit then the whole concept it wrong?

Where does this ignorance come from!

During a March 2002 visit to the White House, after President Bush unveiled a $5 billion aid package, he accompanied the President for a speech on the White House lawn where he stated, "This is an important first step, and a serious and impressive new level of commitment. ... This must happen urgently, because this is a crisis."[81]
I guess that $5 billion that he raised would have ended up Africa anyway right?

Bono donated the $100,000 prize to the organisation.
It's only $100,000 I guess right? Not very much money for a person to donate himself.


Any analysis of U2's business practices will find that they have used every tax avoidance trick in the book. Why does the band not pay Irish taxes and instead use the Netherlands as their tax base. They are classic hypocrites.
How is trying to minimize taxes in your home country related to raising money for starving kids in Africa?

Your entire criticism rests in envy and jealously.
 

mexican

New member
Apr 11, 2005
115
0
0
In reply. The aid money that has been raised and donated to African countries has allowed corrupt regimes to remain in power that are not beholding to their own people. These regimes can bring in their own supporters and increase the size of the government and the corruption is out of control. Corruptions, gov. regulation, crime etc, shrink the middle class are reduce substantially the entrepreneurial activity. Aid is literally killing African countries because there are no levers to influence the receiving countries and no protection of private property.

This situation is fact - the more aid that has been givien to Africa the worse the situation is . The statistics are there. Africa needs free trade within and outside the continent, access to markets, access to credit markets - a strong middle class. Not a welfare hand out.

Bono and the team are not minimizing their Irish taxes but removing all their revenue to another country. They pay no taxes in Ireland. Taxes are used to support social programs for the less advantaged in a country. I get that an individual wants to maximize their own wealth. But Bono and U2 hold them selves out as such great examples - wanting to "feed the poor"etc. Well it seems to me that they do not support the social programs within their own country.

No I am not envious or jealous at all. I admire their marketing savvy. But I was just pointing out their hypocrisy.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,490
1,361
113
When you minimize taxes then call for govenment aid... it is called HYPOCRISY... wanting regular folks to pay for your pet project while you sit there with your hands FIRMLY in you pockets. An entire industry has been built around foreign aid in Africa, in order to keep this industry viable, there NEEDS to be poverty if not the west will stop giving. So GUESS WHAT.. governments there keep the people in poverty and our $$ encourage them to do it. As I said, in emergencies, we should do everything we can to help our fellow nations... natural disasters etc.. but that aid should be MASSIVE and SHORT TERM.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts