So, I didn't read all posts. But we have been through this before.
The possibilities:
Black people are being arrested for drug CHARGES disproportionately more than they are responsible for.
Or the same (i.e. fairly)
Or less.
The article sheds no light on which it is. It operates on the unproven and unlikely basis that all races are identically involved in crime. Strange how everybody recognizes that one gender is more involved in crime, which is true, but the same conclusion about race is labelled a heresy.
It would be ludicrous to suggest that all races commit drug crimes equally. Therefore those races that commit drug crimes more that others logically should be charged more relative to their population .
To flip the script, Japanese Canadians are generally more law abiding than most other racial/ethnic groups. Therefore they are charged with drug crimes far less than their percentage of the population.
If in fact black people are more involved in drug crimes on a per capita basis than Japanese are, but you say they should still be charged the same on a relative (to population) basis, then the inevitable corollary is that you must start charging Japanese Canadians more with drug crimes even though they hardly ever do them.
Stupid story, stupid reasoning.