BBBJ and other unsafe practices
- Thread starter flintstones
- Start date
- Status
Oral clamydia rates from bbbj in Japan and Korea are very high, but oral herpes, is not quite as high as in N. America. Most Japanese and Korean SP'sMingo said:I really don't understand all the fuss that is made here about BBBJ.
In Japan and Korea bbbj is the norm and I have never heard or read of anyone getting std, doing bbbj in Korea or Japan.
If it ever happened it would be all over the news!
It is such a commen pratice from hostess bars, mp,sp and the famous Korean baber shops, that to ever ask if bbbj is offered unheard of.
I was surprised when I first came to Canada that you had to ask for bbbj or some sp only offered cbj.
Also recently all these treads on bbbj, it is surprising!
Though a raincoat has to worn for fs, other wise you would be stupid!
My 2 cents!
Mingo
likely would insist on CBJ with foreigners out of fear, with Japanese SPs very
wary of seeing foreigners in general. If bbbj is so common in Asia, then with
the influx of foreingers, SPs travelling back and forth from Asia to N. America
and back to Asia then serious problems may develop. Korean SPs seem to
travel back and forth alot, maybe this is not true of Japanese Sps.
Any it is all Russian Roulette wherever you go
If HH is providing bbdaty, then her not providing bbbj has little to do with health and more to do with her wanting to avoid giving a bbbj, simply because she does not like it. The health issues are just a smoke screen and irrelevant.
To be degrading ladies that do offer bbbj also seems hypocritical when she is offering bbdaty.
To be degrading ladies that do offer bbbj also seems hypocritical when she is offering bbdaty.
Sorry Kbear, it is about choice. That is the point I have been trying to make. If I choose to preform BBBJ or CBJ, it is my choice. If a client decides on BBDATY, or CDATY, it is his choice and I allow for that. I still have the choice to refuse BBDATY if I feel like it and I have and I will again in the future, I am sure.KBear said:
I know many women who will not see guys who they know go for lactacting services from pregnant women. All I am saying it is a choice. Why is okay for those who do BBBJ, and it is not okay for us who do covered. We are to be boycotted and avoided at all cost and we are the ones falsely advertising.
And read again, I never degraded anyone, simply stated that I choose not to see someone after seeing EVE, Selina, or EE girls, and that is to name a few.
Again, a choice.
HH
Sorry to join the discussion late but I've always been amused by the emphasis for condoms with BJ's but where's the push for dental dams for DATY?
Oh and if you're wondering, I prefer CBJ myself.
Oh and if you're wondering, I prefer CBJ myself.
I don't agree with the slander but it is the free market, after all and clients can speak with their wallets.HappyHookers said:
djk said:
Agreed and I am glad that you see it is a about free choice.
Agreed as well! Hands down! There should be more of push for it. I think it is only fair that every working SP have a supply of dental dams for the clients who so choose to use them.
HH
So let’s sum it up.
No SP should be pushed by a man to do anything they are not comfortable with, and they should not b afraid of being labeled non-GFE.
And
No SP should be pushed by any woman to do anything, when they are comfortable with it, and they should not be categorized or grouped with EE sex slaves just because they do it. (That would just be classless)
No SP should be pushed by a man to do anything they are not comfortable with, and they should not b afraid of being labeled non-GFE.
And
No SP should be pushed by any woman to do anything, when they are comfortable with it, and they should not be categorized or grouped with EE sex slaves just because they do it. (That would just be classless)
Selina said:
So according to your theories here, it's ok to give a guy a BBBJ as long as his herpes aren't in the "open sore" stage and the lights are on?
Isn't that a pretty picture.I give up on BB, you have no understanding, or choose to have no understanding in this manner. You axe to the grind with me is more then apparent and is actually getting a little old.Back Burner said:
No SP or man should be pushed into any kind of service or boycotted for the lack of service.
Second, if you all perform BB service then in some respect you will be compared, not equal to just in some respect compared, as in they all offer that service.
Third, if a women feels she provides a GFE by her definition and that definition is greatly accepted, as in the emotional side of GFE's definition, or based on service and emotional standards, or in the case where is it a little form column A and little from column B, she should be rightfully able to do so.
How much simpler can that be.
HH
Actually I was saying the same thing. If a lady calls herself GFE and does CBJ, fine. But some will say she's not while others will say she is. This goes back to who defines GFE.
And no I don't have an axe to grind with you. Not at all. And I apologize if you feel that way.
I do have a problem with you making a comparison with ladies that provide a service with EE sex slaves. You don't seem to have a problem with that. So shall I compare "you" with EE sex slaves because you might provide the same services, and probably do? See how silly that sounds. It seems, may not be, but seems like you look down on ladies that do.
You make valid points, but it's not just your opinion that counts.
And no I don't have an axe to grind with you. Not at all. And I apologize if you feel that way.
I do have a problem with you making a comparison with ladies that provide a service with EE sex slaves. You don't seem to have a problem with that. So shall I compare "you" with EE sex slaves because you might provide the same services, and probably do? See how silly that sounds. It seems, may not be, but seems like you look down on ladies that do.
You make valid points, but it's not just your opinion that counts.
- Status
