No, he should be raped by 1000 angry men and then killed.any male who decided to fire her should be fired himself
No, he should be raped by 1000 angry men and then killed.any male who decided to fire her should be fired himself
I don't think the whole truth will come out, who knows if the person who wrote the comment is truthful or not, or even really knows her. Either way, I'd hire her as my personal secretary, skimpy clothing only,lolReaders comments from the article posted above
tooSexy4myShirt 06/03/2010 7:39:46 PM
i worked with her at Citi...she dressed like a whore, came in late, would call out (claiming her son was sick meanwhile going to Vegas), was unprofessional, couldn't speak properly, couldn't acquire customers...her red sole heels were 4in platform peep toes that looked more like they belonged at at a strip club than at the office. She was more interested in her looks throughout the day than meeting her goals. btw...NOT wearing a bra while wearing a tight turtleneck in the middle of winter so everyone could admire her $15k boob job...yeah---um, that IS calling attention to yourself.
It is unlikely that the whole truth and nothing but the truth are presented here by the woman and the bank. Incidentally why don't banks just make employees wear uniforms as so many places do? Wouldn't that solve the dress too sexy problem. LOL!!!Banks are notoriously conservative so I'm not surprised. And remember, her boss could have been an ugly old hag who couldn't stand that she was getting all the attention.
After looking at some of her piks though, I suspect there were other outfits she was wearing that were inappropriate. She very well could be a desperate attention whore.
I was just gonna say that, Playboy will be knocking now, just a matter of time.My 0.02 worth is that she will be the Playboy celebrity nude for September 2010. Physically, she sort of reminds me of the now retired Angelique @ Mirage.
She wasn't a teller.It is unlikely that the whole truth and nothing but the truth are presented here by the woman and the bank. Incidentally why don't banks just make employees wear uniforms as so many places do? Wouldn't that solve the dress too sexy problem. LOL!!!
Huh. It will be interesting to see what she chooses for her next occupation. One of us will have the check the New York escort boards in a few months to see if she's working.she isn't that hot. there were way hotter chicks working at the place i used to when i was in finance. i think she's just an attention whore.
I'll book her.Huh. It will be interesting to see what she chooses for her next occupation. One of us will have the check the New York escort boards in a few months to see if she's working.
R2R
Great points, Ceiling. I wonder who paid for the pics on the internet? I was just reading the story in the NY Daily news online - she's a divorced, single mother. As hot as she thinks she is, there is some guy out there who grew tired of her antics. And he's probably the guy who shelled out the $15k for her implants.The bank has her work record, I am sure they will have a few Gertrudes that work with her to testify un her unprofessional conduct, and all the pics on the internet supports the plaintifs case.
She will loose this case, but I am sure that she has gotten hundreds of offers from other places that need a flaunter. She can not be a spokesperson if she can not speak properly, if she can not deliver and concentrate on her job then she will be used by the other companies.
BTW - She has a nice body, but her face is plain. Beauty is a natural born gift, her attractiveness is from her clothes and body.
I agree about the face, it's mediocre, but the body and clothes are the main thing about her.The bank has her work record, I am sure they will have a few Gertrudes that work with her to testify un her unprofessional conduct, and all the pics on the internet supports the plaintifs case.
She will loose this case, but I am sure that she has gotten hundreds of offers from other places that need a flaunter. She can not be a spokesperson if she can not speak properly, if she can not deliver and concentrate on her job then she will be used by the other companies.
BTW - She has a nice body, but her face is plain. Beauty is a natural born gift, her attractiveness is from her clothes and body.
But seemingly Citibank/Citigroup didn't bother to consult their corporate counsel before they fired here. If there is any evidence that they fired her for her looks - she's likely going to be able to live on her investment income in the future!Banks are notoriously conservative so I'm not surprised.
If I were Citigroup, I wouldn't count my chickens quite yet. U.S. Courts really hate mandatory-arbitration clauses being used to "screw-over" righteous plaintiffs.Citibank made Lorenzana sign a mandatory-arbitration clause as a condition of her employment, the case will never end up before a jury or judge. An arbitrator will decide.
We will see what we will see. It sounds DJK like you may know more of the details than I thus far have heard. But Citi better hope all of the above is well documented.Thoughts.
1) Citi has a dress code. She didn't conform to it. I'd be surprised if Citi didn't do their due diligence before firing her. HR is there not for the workers but to protect corporate from legal action.
3) Sounds like she's probably been advised she will lose if it goes to trial, so she's hoping for the next best thing; a settlement and publicity.