Cheating is certainly hurtful and offensive to the cheated on spouse, but cheating in the Western world in 2015 is not criminal.
I wonder if these hackers could do the same thing to websites like Terb.cc?
Pretty silly question, I would think if Ashely Madison has over 30 million subscribers they must have had some kind of "security" which would be A LOT stronger than Terb which pales in comparison to Madison.
As I read "cheating is certainly hurtful" I thought to myself, -says the guy on escort review board-................and I read on "but cheating ...is not criminal".... trying to feel better about yourself? Justification? LOL
Cheating is certainly hurtful and offensive to the cheated on spouse, but cheating in the Western world in 2015 is not criminal. However these "do gooder" hackers are criminals plain and simple.
Further, one wonders if they feel the slightest ownership of the harm likely to result from their data dump.
And no I don't have an Ashley Madison account and don't much care for Ashley Madison.
Yawns
You guys do realize MAJOR sites like Target and Sony have been hacked and posted before right?
AshleyMadison is small fry
Worst case scenario is a few credit cards get compromised so what
EDIT- and most of the older data is useless, the file starts at 2007, care to bet most of those credit cards are expired by now?
Yawns
You guys do realize MAJOR sites like Target and Sony have been hacked and posted before right?
AshleyMadison is small fry
Worst case scenario is a few credit cards get compromised so what
EDIT- and most of the older data is useless, the file starts at 2007, care to bet most of those credit cards are expired by now?
I haven't seen any reliable info yet, but I would tend to doubt that the data could be tied to an individual just from the name, or even credit card address data. Can't someone buy a disposable credit card, associate whatever name and address they choose, and use it?
I have heard suggestions that at least some email addresses are as bogus as anything - addresses with "a .va" domain for a Canadian client, for example. This would tend to suggest accounts didn't require email address verification either in order to be created.
Correct, accounts didn't require email address verification so thousands of email accounts are likely bogus.I haven't seen any reliable info yet, but I would tend to doubt that the data could be tied to an individual just from the name, or even credit card address data. Can't someone buy a disposable credit card, associate whatever name and address they choose, and use it?
I have heard suggestions that at least some email addresses are as bogus as anything - addresses with "a .va" domain for a Canadian client, for example. This would tend to suggest accounts didn't require email address verification either in order to be created.
Due to the nature of the site, it has the prospect of causing more than just financial/security problems for members. This makes it distinct from general banking or retail breaches.
Hope it becomes available. Should be a fun read.