I appreciate the reference made by MT. 1st thing I noticed is that it was from San Francisco. Is it just my feeling, or is there a greater number of gay males in that region? I think the more prevalent the promiscuous behaviour the higher the risk of an STD. I know you cannot tell if someone is affected by most diseases, I imagine there is no tell tale sign (until later stages) of some of these STD's (or I's for "infections"), however it is generally all relative. Since my risky behaviour centers around the odd SP 1-3 per year and the rest of my hobbying confined to rub and tuggeries, I am fairly confident that my risk factor is extremely low compared to say cruising for street action with the I.V. druggie looking for cash for her next fix. I am not opposed to any SP who doesn't perform bbbjtc, all I am saying is that coming from my point of view, it is something that I enjoy way more than MPOS (except doggie) and I am in 7th heaven for days afterward, which is why I resort to the occasional carefully selected SP in the first place. Yes, I agree whole heartedly that unprotected sex is dangerous, and do not recommend this activity. Coming from my perspective, it is what I am looking for when I choose a SP because it is what I want, it does my body good and the psychological release is so much more intense (for me) than CFS. To each their own. I have my reasons for wanting and seeking this activity, based on my own values and likes. I am discriminating in my own way and if it is not your cup of tea, then so be it. I mentioned earlier that far be it for me to be somewhere that I am not welcome. Considering all the risky behaviours that sexually active people can and do participate in, I feel that mine, while not 100% risk free, is on the minimal side of dangerous.