That had to be the most sensible thing you have ever said. It wasn't that hard to admit it, was it now?Metoo4 said:I knew (We all did!) that you would have come back with your superiority again, it's a pattern with you! You have the truth and anybody else who disagree is not worth much!
As you apparently missed it the first time around, I will spell it out more slowly: I was mocking the stupidity of Rider55 to say that I should only speak constructively when it is obvious most people on this particular forum don't know how to be any other way *but* negative. Why should I speak a language that won't be understood by the natives?What rule of saying only positive? The board is not intended to see life in pink but to show reality! If it's positive, it is, if it's negative, it still is!
"...saying something constructive..." you said...
Okay, let's recap: someone who has bashed Britney in the past over her not answering his calls and not being around (personally, I get the impression she is screening him out and he likely doesn't quite realize it) brings up the same old tired and leading question that always leads to a bashing session. If the original post had merely asked where she was, I might have agreed with your assessment but the inclusion of "Surprised?" tells volumes of the true intent to harass.And how come that thread would not have been started? He's got the right to ask about somebody!
It's a two-way street, buddy. If *you* (that's in the plural sense meaning many of you out there) don't like having your obvious shortcomings and foibles pointed out to you, there is an ignore feature you can use to not see my posts anymore. Stop pounding the keyboard with the hamfists and learn to utilize it. But I will be quite forward in saying that I won't stop posting unless specifically asked by a moderator to stop because the general public not only has a right to hear something much closer to reality but I have the right to voice my observations and opinions until Fred Zed (or his representatives) decides otherwise. Get over it and accept the fact that I am not going away.....I have as much right (or maybe even more) to post here than you.Of course, if you can't refrain from watching how pathetic we are, why don't you just lurk and refrain from posting? I'm certain nobody would complain and this thread would have lived it's intended life without YOU digging shit!
It's like the old lady watching porn on tv late at night and complaining that's it's immoral... If you don't like it, DON"T LOOK!!
Always the last line before posting again on the same subject.Last post on this topic for me.
True enough....follows my own point exactly as to why this thread got started in the first place, as it certainly wasn't asking for a review nor providing one.champ said:I was waiting for too2shy to enter the fray!
You have become reserved in your elder years.
Well said though.
yes. some of us are here for the same purpose for that which the board was designed.. others? i guess you can call them fluffers for the contributing members.pkt_rkt said:Like a bunch of clucking hens in here. Where's the eggs? Jeez guys, enough already. Aren't we all here for the same purpose?
Actually, Ottawa wasn't all that bad while I was there but it certainly appears to have degenerated in a serious way since I left. I have had a total of over 400 posts "misplaced" from my post count due to an error made by TERB, so you can assume whatever you want about what those posts contained.....but most of that was during my time in Ottawa (lots of good stuff lost.....really it's too bad).Rider55 said:Funny thing is - if Ottawa was so bad when you were here, and now it isn't after you happened to move away, what conclusion are we left to draw...