Boys. No. That’s way to much for all the restrictions. Looks at her 80 max.
First of all we don’t know all of her restrictions. Her response mentioned nothing about Dfk, daty, etc. Second of all, it is not up to us to determine what she prices her rates at for her service, so I find your comment pretty degrading. If she feels that she delivers agency quality experience(160/hh being the agency set standard) plus being attractive, then I hope that she does deliver such. With that being said, some ladies charge higher specifically based on the quality of their service despite their appearance and some ladies charge higher based on their appearance more than their service, then there are some girls who have perfect pricing based off of everything. At the end of the day, it is solely up to you as the customer to determine what you’re willing to pay and for what.
Now, personally, I would not pay160/hh for an unreviewed lady that provides what she is claiming to offer solely based on my own preferences. But I heavily disagree on saying that her services are worth half of what she’s asking for solely based on restrictions alone when you have not seen her to make such a bold and degrading statement. Everybody has their own price limits on what they’re willing to pay for what, yours is 80/hh for what she’s offering, and that’s fine. But maybe don’t express it in a condescending and degrading manner. For all you know someone on here is willing to see her right now and could come back with a review for us that validates what she’s advertising. So maybe unless you’re willing toTOFTT don’t be a judgmental prick, especially for someone who hasn’t made any significant contributions other than a small positive note about a rubntug
Unless the only reason you’re saying that is because you’re implying that if she did charge 80/hh, it would fit into your price limits, in which case you would indeed go see her but you can’t because you aren’t willing to pay what she’s asking
TL;DR: Don’t be a cheap judgemental douche