She lost me in the first 30 seconds. Essentially, her argument hinges on the idea that if sex work is normal, then sex workers are just workers, which makes pimps managers and that feels wrong to her.
First off, you can’t make laws based on feelings. You just can’t. Laws need to be rational. There needs to be irrefutable proof that breaking said law causes harm to other people or society as a whole.
Second, she implies that all sex workers have pimps. This is obviously not the case. I suppose in the very most literal sense it’s true, since owning/operating a brothel or escort agency, by dictionary definition, makes you a pimp, but we know that’s not what she means. She means a dude in a fur coat wearing a feather boa, a white fedora with a tiger print band and a giant feather, carrying a jewel-encrusted cane. This is not the reality for most sex workers. Plenty of them work independently or for ethically-run agencies. They’re not being exploited (hell, if anything they’re doing the exploiting!), they’re working a job they chose to work. Why are you trying tell them they can’t do that job? It’s completely nonsensical.
