I didn't intend it to be a review at all, was merely pointing out her body is not quite what the pictures suggest!@jack meoff : I've only seen stellar reviews for this SP. The fact that she uses a couple borrowed pictures doesn't raise any flags for me. Majority of these girls do. I wouldn't consider 2 to 3 years ago as a recent review.
@jack meoff : I've only seen stellar reviews for this SP. The fact that she uses a couple borrowed pictures doesn't raise any flags for me. Majority of these girls do. I wouldn't consider 2 to 3 years ago as a recent review.
That's sound reasoning IMO. but in Angels case, she's modeled in the past so she's always had a very taut frame on her and with any of the names she's used, her reviews have been good. So all in all, she's been a solid provider, but we all make our own mind's up in the end.I was about to pull the trigger but IMHO at her price point borrowed pictures are unacceptable.
She is still modelling, is a fitness trainer and has her own trainer as well. Fit as anyone I have ever visited....in Angels case, she's modeled in the past...
Thank-you bcd for chiming in. I didn't want to speculate, but had thought as much from our last conversation.She is still modelling, is a fitness trainer and has her own trainer as well. Fit as anyone I have ever visited.