re: Silver Fox
So far Silver, I have made no caustic remarks about anyone. In fact I am trying to get this back to what it should be....reviewing the hobby. This includes both GOOD and BAD reviews and our ability to discuss them. I am reminding all (but here most specifically, bold1) that leaping to the rescue of the ladies reviewed on this site, though well intentioned, certainly can appear to be shilling. Though in this case unnecessary since Anastacia has already a good reputation. Saying that a woman is "tough", i.e JUdy, is not a disparaging remark nor a fault. It is the way she is and how she must be approached. This thereby letting other hobbiests know that getting into this woman's face is not the way to go. Treated with respect will get you a lot farther.
As I stated in my previous post, I apologized for not knowing the particulars in regards to chuck and I stated what should be done to people that irresponsibly take shots at Sp's. If anything, Silver, the comments you made i.e., "kindergarten scrap", "nasty jabs" is actually what is turning this into a "scrap". Continue on with your statement of making only positive reviews about Anastacia and Judy and I find this shilling at best. I know of one person who had a bad time with Anastacia (not on this board, a personal friend of mine) as compared to the number who had good times. Does this make his review, if he were to post one, invalid and not deserving of comment? If so, then Fred might as well shut this board down. That is not the purpose of this board. It is to describe both bad experiences and good experiences, allow the hobbiest to balance those reviews and make his decision.