Almost same the numbers drawed for 6/49...

[Fred Zed]

Why not, you seem to be bragging about knowing how to pick numbers.
Pick the BIG ONES.

I will strike when the time is ripe !
I will leave the 649 jackpot for you to collect. It's your turn to win something !
And while you are at it here is some reading material that might help you:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/rpkp/experiments/statistics.html

 

[Fred Zed]

You make this look WAY too easy, 5th 6th time winning 7/7? congrats! =)

Total investment 5dollars?
What persuaded you to use 1 3 6 60 as key followers for all sets?
I see 64 69 70 past draw repeats from prior draws..
Also 10s & 40s somewhat skipped on the 3rd and 4th, but quite difficult to pinpoint 3 - 5 numbers within a series of skipped 9 10numbers still...

Only playing pick 4 lately.. 2dollars box@$400 few days go

good luck with 8/8 hopefully!
cheers

abstinent: I was just lucky. 60 was an overdue number so I used it as a key
As for the remaining numbers I restricted my play
to numbers between 1-10 and then 60-70
picking different sets of 3 from each.

 

[guelph]

That's a good place to start.

I knew a computer programmer who said that certain balls would wear out in time, more than others, and those balls would result in the repetition of certain #s, therefore, not so independent or random. He wrote software to track the repetition of #s to detect any patterns. (He didn't win the lottery).

The solution was to use new balls everytime.

balls used to weighed every few weeks at forensic science lab and if not within tolerances discarded -- don't know if this is till the case

 

[Fred Zed]

Knowing math is of no value in a lottery.
Except to tell you that you should expect to lose.
And that even seemingly non-random sequences are really random.

Some basic knowledge of combinatorics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorics#Enumerative_combinatorics
can help you win more money. The winning ticket I posted above is
actually based on a "system " that has worked for me several times before.
Some understanding of probability also helps.
eg: you want to be spending most of your betting $ on lotteries
with better odds.

 

[Cobster]

I will strike when the time is ripe !
I will leave the 649 jackpot for you to collect. It's your turn to win something !
And while you are at it here is some reading material that might help you:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/rpkp/experiments/statistics.html

I wonder if those that won the big jackpots ever used that theory?

Like the lady in Etobicoke who played her numbers once, then something told her to go back to the store and play them again, needless to say, she took home 2/3 of the jackpot and the other 1/3rd went to someone else in Canada.

Or the kid that won the $29 million jackpot back in spring and said he hardly played the lottery (or something to that effect).

Can't forget the birthday picking winners, or the random picking numbers like this guy in 2007, remember him?
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNe...ottery_winner_070611/20070611?hub=CTVNewsAt11

"Just random good guessing, that's all,'' he said. "No science, no inside knowledge, just random luck.

=)

 

[Scenicdrive]

I wonder if those that won the big jackpots ever used that theory?

Like the lady in Etobicoke who played her numbers once, then something told her to go back to the store and play them again, needless to say, she took home 2/3 of the jackpot and the other 1/3rd went to someone else in Canada.

Or the kid that won the $29 million jackpot back in spring and said he hardly played the lottery (or something to that effect).

Can't forget the birthday picking winners, or the random picking numbers like this guy in 2007, remember him?
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNe...ottery_winner_070611/20070611?hub=CTVNewsAt11

"Just random good guessing, that's all,'' he said. "No science, no inside knowledge, just random luck.

=)

Master Cobster:

Don't underestimate the power of The Force. When it is time for Freddie to master The Force, there is no such thing as 'random luck'. He will strike the jackpots at will. Watch out!!! LOL!!!

 

[Fred Zed]

Master Cobster:

Don't underestimate the power of The Force. When it is time for Freddie to master The Force, there is no such thing as 'random luck'. He will strike the jackpots at will. Watch out!!! LOL!!!

master cobster ..what a scientific survey ? eh ?
Do you remember the man who won $14m a few years ago and gave away a lot of food ? He had won $100 000, and $250 000 previously and no, he was not relying on quick picks or random luck. He had a math whiz/computer person preparing the numbers for him !
Or the man who got 10/10 Ontario Keno twice in January this year, he had a system as well.
Anyway, good players always buy a few quicks every game, however
they invest most of their money in good back-up systems.

You miss my point. You should play lotteries with better odds.
It's better to win something than lose everything. And if you rely on quick
picks to deliver the 649 jackpot to you you might be waiting 1000 years or more.

 

[Scenicdrive]

master cobster ..what a scientific survey ? eh ?
Do you remember the man who won $14m a few years ago and gave away a lot of food ? He had won $100 000, and $250 000 previously and no, he was not relying on quick picks or random luck. He had a math whiz/computer person preparing the numbers for him !
Or the man who got 10/10 Ontario Keno twice in January this year, he had a system as well.
Anyway, good players always buy a few quicks every game, however
they invest most of their money in good back-up systems.
You miss my point. You should play lotteries with better odds.
It's better to win something than lose everything. And if you rely on quick
picks to deliver the 649 jackpot to you you might be waiting 1000 years or more.

Freddie:

Are you sure if Master Cobster lived to 1000 years old or more, he would hit the 649 jackpot via quick picks??? Might he be too senile to quickly pick up himself for the quick picks??? LOL!!!

 

[Cobster]

master cobster ..what a scientific survey ? eh ?
Do you remember the man who won $14m a few years ago and gave away a lot of food ? He had won $100 000, and $250 000 previously and no, he was not relying on quick picks or random luck. He had a math whiz/computer person preparing the numbers for him !
Or the man who got 10/10 Ontario Keno twice in January this year, he had a system as well.
Anyway, good players always buy a few quicks every game, however
they invest most of their money in good back-up systems.

You miss my point. You should play lotteries with better odds.
It's better to win something than lose everything. And if you rely on quick
picks to deliver the 649 jackpot to you you might be waiting 1000 years or more.

But most of the winners, most of the time (of the big jackpots) were either quick picks, random numbers, birthdays or some other randomly generated way.

That's my point.

I'm not relying on quick picks, I play numbers I pick myself and sometimes toss in quick picks. I don't play it religiously, just every so often, same goes for Keno.

It does make one wonder however, how many times these guys played with their scientific methods before they scored big and exactly how much coin they lost as well. THAT would be an interesting factoid in all this.

 

[Fred Zed]

But most of the winners, most of the time (of the big jackpots) were either quick picks, random numbers, birthdays or some other randomly generated way.

That's my point.

.

That's because most people pick their numbers that way, roughly 80%!
Did I not explain that to you before ?

 

[Cobster]

...and it seems most are won that way.

Okay are we done here? lol

 

[ToronToto]

August 26, 2009

04 - 06 - 09 - 29 - 33 - 49......Bonus 15

Sept. 02, 2009

04 - 06 - 09 - 30 - 33 - 49.......Bonus 13

what da f#@!.....

If this is true, the odds of this happening even over 20 year time span is almost astronomical.

For this to happen in consecutive weeks, even more astronomical, probably 1 in 1,000,000,000,000 (1000 billion).

Any statisticians here on TERB?

 

[Fred Zed]

And knowledge of ANY BRANCH OF MATH, including combinatorics, is of no value to helping you win the lottery. (BTW, which branch of combinatorics do you think applies here? I'm curious.)

arthurfrozelli, I am sure you are a good mathematician but if you really
think I am making this stuff up why don't you put your money where your mouth
is:
- you set $500 aside, I do the same ( I still have money left from my last win)
- we play 7 number keno 100 combinations per draw 5 games
- you play quick picks, I use my system
I can assure you that my $ return will be better than yours
in at least 4/5 games, if not all the games.
In fact I might get all 7 numbers correct by the 5th game. Whereas after the 5 games
your best games via QPs will be 5/7.

And if you get a better return than me, I pay your costs.

 

[Fred Zed]

I only have one system right now, "praying" i might as well use one of those lotto promo number pickers LOL

Even with prayer, Arthurfrozelli would not do better than
me via quick picks, that I am quite sure about. Done this with my neighbour
a few times and each time I outperfomed his quick picks..lol

 

[Toke]

I need to start a system as this Lotto max starts at 10mill...checking those previously posted links from those other threads everyone gave their inputs towards combo selections ...i'm serious about winning now, but i still did some quick picks for tonights and Fridays draws

What's up with your timing? Your drive comes after the 6/49 became less 'fair' at $2, and two days before the second 'most fair' lottery (however by a long shot) ends; in favour of a considerably 'less fair' Lotto Max? If my advice means anything, forget Lotto Max (or play at a minimum) and if you must play, stick with 6/49. Of the one-million dollar-plus lotteries, it is still the most fair as the return on investment AND odds of winning the jackpot are bigger.

 

[abstinent]

arthurfrozelli, I am sure you are a good mathematician but if you really
think I am making this stuff up why don't you put your money where your mouth
is:
- you set $500 aside, I do the same ( I still have money left from my last win)
- we play 7 number keno 100 combinations per draw 5 games
- you play quick picks, I use my system
I can assure you that my $ return will be better than yours
in at least 4/5 games, if not all the games.
In fact I might get all 7 numbers correct by the 5th game. Whereas after the 5 games
your best games via QPs will be 5/7.

And if you get a better return than me, I pay your costs.

Im sold How easily/lines can you hit 6/6 when the right parameters/patterns come into play? Wouldn't mind a better system than I correctly have to work with. You take paypal(100usd?)

Only reason randoms/QP work better cause its the majority of sales. Proportionally, having a system > blind gambling

 

[danmand]

August 26, 2009

04 - 06 - 09 - 29 - 33 - 49......Bonus 15

Sept. 02, 2009

04 - 06 - 09 - 30 - 33 - 49.......Bonus 13


what da f#@!.....

In Bulgaria, identical numbers September 6 and september 10: 4, 15, 23, 24, 35 and 42.

 

[ToronToto]

I could run the numbers, but I've roughed them out and they're FAR from astronomical, considering the numbers aren't the same.

And knowledge of ANY BRANCH OF MATH, including combinatorics, is of no value to helping you win the lottery. (BTW, which branch of combinatorics do you think applies here? I'm curious.)

AFonzerelli, you are right. My comments about "astronomical" are off.

Even though the 6/49 odds are:
* match all 6 numbers: 14 M (million) (49! / 43! / 6!)
* match only 5 numbers: 55 k (thousand)

For any given set of 5 numbers, there are actually just 55k combinations. So the odds of getting 5 numbers are quite probable. Ever notice that the prize for 5 numbers is usually a just a few thousand dollars? wtf?

Any set of 5 numbers, because of randomness, could repeat on consecutive weeks. However, on "average", it is less "likely" to occur in our lifetime. For all 55k combinations of 5 numbers to be drawn (assuming uniqueness of 5 numbers on every draw), it would take 500+ years for this to occur (2 draws per week). This was really my point (I really thought that ALL six numbers matched!).

As for strategy, any good strategy would eliminate "low probability" of duplicated sets of numbers. Yet, somehow rely on some sort of "trend", which I have yet to analyze fully. I am not sure what "strategy" Fred is referring to.

So, in some sense, to play a set of 5 numbers that has already been drawn is probably not going to happen in our life time. Assuming "average" "randomness", it will take 250 years. For this to occur on consecutive weeks, I think one should avoid, if using a "strategy"?

 

[lace]

Thanks j69

August 26, 2009

04 - 06 - 09 - 29 - 33 - 49......Bonus 15

Sept. 02, 2009

04 - 06 - 09 - 30 - 33 - 49.......Bonus 13


what da f#@!.....

OMG!!!Thanks for posting these numbers!!!I'd heard the numbers were almost the same but didn't realize that close.That's unbelieveable!Thanks again.

 

[Mencken]

People look at a string of numbers that "look" random and they don't have a lot of problem believing they are random. But they see a string that looks less than random and immediately bring out the conspiracy theories. Any specified string of 6 numbers is equally probable or improbable, assuming the equipment is all working properly. 1-2-3-4-5-6 has never been a winning ticket as far as I know, but no reason why it could not have been.

Having 5 numbers the same two weeks in a row would be an improbable event to predict for any particular time, but over a period of time it is actually a very probable event.

But, unless the machine is rigged or not working properly there is no system that can help you win. The past has no influence on the future...5 heads in a row does not improve your odds for getting a tail.

Or, with the nature of this board in mind...head 5 times does not increase your chances of tail.