A warning from Bernie Sanders to America
- Thread starter nottyboi
- Start date
1) Irrelevant - consolidating or changing names doesn't change the totals. You don't know how accounting works.
2) This is a Canada-wide issue and represents governments seeking to change how we do things. There are numerous OECD Health Care reports that rank Canada 2nd last. How conservative of you to be so resistant to change. Many OECD countries have a mix of private and public health care and rank significantly higher than Canada. Within Canada, Quebec is a great example of mixing public & private.
3) Please point this out.
4)
I'm honestly shocked you thought of this. Including inflation and the numbers do look different. I'm glad you're actually reading what I post and you're leaning how some can fudge numbers with currently, PPP, & inflation.Note that the only way to meet the FAOs report on future Health Care is to draw from other budget items. This has nothing to do with Ford and is a result of an aging populating (too many fucking old people) that is overwhelming Hospitals and other Health Care facilities. Any other political party in power would have to face the same decision of which budget item to fuck over (Environment? Justice? Infrastructure?). The FAO is not elected and doesn't get to make that decision.
Last edited:
Don't be dumb. Those countries have very similar items that may or may not be included.
Please feel free to post your data that shows Canada has the highest tax rate. You won't because you can't. Put up or shut up.
Except that Canada is doing well under the liberals compared to the rest of the G7 or G20.
Climate change costs are coming, crop failure and increased insurance will be the first ones you'll fee.
Already other countries are reeling from paying out for massive hurricane, flood and fire damage.
California may cost the US $250 billion.
You just made my point, Canada does well but Ontario is failing at health care.1) Irrelevant - consolidating or changing names doesn't change the totals. You don't know how accounting works.
2) This is a Canada-wide issue and represents governments seeking to change how we do things. There are numerous OECD Health Care reports that rank Canada 2nd last. How conservative of you to be so resistant to change. Many OECD countries have a mix of private and public health care and rank significantly higher than Canada. Within Canada, Quebec is a great example of mixing public & private.
3) Please point this out.
4)
Note that the only way to meet the FAOs report on future Health Care is to draw from other budget items. This has nothing to do with Ford and is a result of an aging populating (too many fucking old people) that is overwhelming Hospitals and other Health Care facilities. Any other political party in power would have to face the same decision of which budget item to fuck over (Environment? Justice? Infrastructure?). The FAO is not elected and doesn't get to make that decision.
the debt / GDP ratio has been used to justify irresponsible govt spending./ borrowing
it is pretty simple
the taxpayer can not borrow to spend in perpetuity or really bad shit happens
the same goes for govt
in fact if a business report a tax loss for seven years running CRA decides that is not a viable business and will audit that business
Justin Trudeau has 9+ years of deficits
unbelievably irresponsible
criminal in my opinion
I assume this means you'll be voting for the banker over the career politician in our next federal election.
Yawn, yet you're not stating what ratio or measurement of Debt you like? Go figure. You just want to bitch and moan over an well recognized measurement.
How about you try "Structural Defecit" is more important to you? Is this the economically solid correct answer you were looking for?
Another way of measuring the impact of a government’s policies is to account for its structural deficit, which can be broadly defined as the negative gap that would remain between revenue and expenditure if real economic activity was equal to the potential level. In other words, without the impact of exceptional events such as a pandemic or an economic crisis on government revenues and spending.
Justin Trudeau’s fiscal legacy
The Trudeau years have been marked by increased interventionism, rising deficits, an uncertain reform and the worst single tax policy in decades.
policyoptions.irpp.org
Last edited:
So you have no idea if it's true or not and you're just repeating it over and over and over? You had no idea if it's true or not? You're serious?
You are literally feelings over facts.
You had little credibility before, now you have less than zero.
I have no idea if you're a kid or a senior on the edge of dementia.
Kudos for admitting it though.
Last edited:
Feel free to demonstrate how Ontario's results are better or worse than other provinces...
Except for the United States which is outpacing everyone. We're a neighbour of the US and economically benefit from them in a BIG way. It has very little to do with us.
Thank you for proving my point. Do you even read your posts?
Climate Change mitigation costs money. If your economy is in the tank, if people can't put food on the table, get jobs, get housing, no one will give a shit about Climate Change. Economics are at the root of everything.
Too bad it's obvious you lack the background to know this.
Last edited:
no, Trudeau has screwed this country up and we are taxed far too much
No here are some facts for you
[
its a fact: Trudeau has screwed this country up
ah no
lots of people seem to like what I post
well , lets just say that you have no idea and know very little about me.
I heard a misquote , I repeated it , you called me on it and proved that specific statement was inaccurate- so I fessed up
it happens
There was no intent to mislead anyone and Canadians are taxed way too much
You had your shot at me.
Now you get to decide if you want to try to milk this further
currently I have no quarrel with you .
you should consider keeping it that way
Climate change disasters cost more than mitigation. $250 billion for California this year alone.
what is your problem ?
A well recognized measurement which nottiboi tried to used to justify irresponsible spending and borrowing
Debt / GDP is also what the loonie Chrystia Freeland tried to use to justify irresponsible spending and borrowing
Debt/ GDP is what most irresponsible left wing politician uses to justify irresponsible spending and borrowing
nottiboi did not try and use "Structural Deficit" to mislead anyone
he used "debt/ GDP" to try and justify Trudeau's irresponsible spending / borrowing.
do you get it now ???? or are you yawning instead of paying attention
and yes Trudeau has bult a "Structural Deficit' and it will be extremely difficult / painful to fix
I have mentioned that several times in other posts
you are wasting your time trying to convince / educate frankfooter
there is a reason why so many have him on ignore.
You claim to be a chemist but can't understand basic climatology.
You claim to understand economics but your position is stuck in the 80's with the trickle down effect.
Have you had a new idea this century?
If more oligarchs supported the Republicans then why could they not raise more campaign money than the Dems? Like didn't the Dems raise (and blow) double?
