A Cloaking Device for Earth

eznutz

Active member
Jul 17, 2007
2,393
0
36
The transit method is presently the most successful planet discovery and characterization tool at our disposal. Other advanced civilizations would surely be aware of this technique and appreciate that their home planet’s existence and habitability is essentially broadcast to all stars lying along their ecliptic plane.

We suggest that advanced civilizations could cloak their presence, or deliberately broadcast it, through controlled laser emission. Such emission could distort the apparent shape of their transit light curves with relatively little energy, due to the collimated beam and relatively infrequent nature of transits.

We estimate that humanity could cloak the Earth from Kepler-like broadband surveys using an optical monochromatic laser array emitting a peak power of ∼30 MW for ∼10 hours per year. A chromatic cloak, effective at all wavelengths, is more challenging requiring a large array of tunable lasers with a total power of ∼250 MW.

Alternatively, a civilization could cloak only the atmospheric signatures associated with biological activity on their world, such as oxygen, which is achievable with a peak laser power of just ∼160 kW per transit. Finally, we suggest that the time of transit for optical SETI is analogous to the water-hole in radio SETI, providing a clear window in which observers may expect to communicate.

Accordingly, we propose that a civilization may deliberately broadcast their technological capabilities by distorting their transit to an artificial shape, which serves as both a SETI beacon and a medium for data transmission. Such signatures could be readily searched in the archival data of transit surveys.

http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/03/30/mnras.stw672
 
I wuz just thinkin' da same thing.

Then explain to me why "relatively infrequent nature of transits." observed by "stars lying along our ecliptic plane" would mean distortion is only needed when the advanced civilization is perceiving said transit?

It seems to me you would have to know which stars where advanced enough to look, otherwise the laser would have to distort continuously for there would always be stars aligned with our transit somewhere.

Totally ill thought out.
 
Last edited:
Then explain to me why a "relatively infrequent nature of transits." due to the fact only "stars lying along our ecliptic plane" would mean distortion is only needed when the advanced civilization is perceiving said transit?

It seems to me you would have to know which stars where advanced enough to look, otherwise the laser would have to distort continuously.


I was thinking that maybe it has more to do with the relativity of the cytoplasmic membrane nourishing the protoplasmic nucleus than the Magna Carta's influence on binary fusion or trout fission.
 
Well, it would depend on what transit method was used...

If it were the TTC, then the Workers Union might object and go on strike, fuck the whole thing up and the monochromatic laser array would emit a misleading full chromatic spectrum signal which would confuse and deceive an advanced civilization anywhere in our ecliptic plane.

Then who knows what could happen?

Bad shit, eh? Well, except on Mondays and Fridays between 9 am and 6 pm.

Perry
 
Well, it would depend on what transit method was used...

If it were the TTC, then the Workers Union might object and go on strike, fuck the whole thing up and the monochromatic laser array would emit a misleading full chromatic spectrum signal which would confuse and deceive an advanced civilization anywhere in our ecliptic plane.

Then who knows what could happen?

Bad shit, eh? Well, except on Mondays and Fridays between 9 am and 6 pm.

Perry

Lord save us if astrologers unionize and an asteroid is heading our way!
 
Last edited:
No idea specifically about the article and what the heck transit is or how we detect other planets and how we can detect the composition of the planet. However I do believe the analogy would be photography in low light situations, you have to set the exposure longer, now if you set the exposure to a very long time and some jackass just flashes a LED light bulb for 1 nanosecond, the entire photograph is ruined. This is probably similar to the proposed method in the article.
 
I was thinking that maybe it has more to do with the relativity of the cytoplasmic membrane nourishing the protoplasmic nucleus than the Magna Carta's influence on binary fusion or trout fission.

the magna carta, along with the "charter of the forrest" is now on display at fort York for any aficionados of astrophysics
 
I am discombobulated at the possibilities