A Bush pre-election strike on Iran 'imminent'

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Some scary reading because it is possible. Perhaps Bush has been 'hearing voices' again and feels a need to expand his 'crusade.'........

Bush pre-election strike on Iran 'imminent'
White House insider report "October Surprise" imminent


By Wayne Madsen

10/20/04 "Lebanon Wire" -- According to White House and Washington Beltway insiders, the Bush administration, worried that it could lose the presidential election to Senator John F. Kerry, has initiated plans to launch a military strike on Iran's top Islamic leadership, its nuclear reactor at Bushehr on the Persian Gulf, and key nuclear targets throughout the country, including the main underground research site at Natanz in central Iran and another in Isfahan. Targets of the planned U.S. attack reportedly include mosques in Tehran, Qom, and Isfahan known by the U.S. to headquarter Iran's top mullahs.

The Iran attack plan was reportedly drawn up after internal polling indicated that if the Bush administration launched a so-called anti-terrorist attack on Iran some two weeks before the election, Bush would be assured of a landslide win against Kerry. Reports of a pre-emptive strike on Iran come amid concerns by a number of political observers that the Bush administration would concoct an "October Surprise" to influence the outcome of the presidential election.

According to White House sources, the USS John F. Kennedy was deployed to the Arabian Sea to coordinate the attack on Iran. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld discussed the Kennedy's role in the planned attack on Iran when he visited the ship in the Arabian Sea on October 9. Rumsfeld and defense ministers of U.S. coalition partners, including those of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Iraq, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Mongolia, Poland, Qatar, Romania, and Ukraine briefly discussed a very "top level" view of potential dual-track military operations in Iran and Iraq in a special "war room" set up on board the aircraft carrier. America's primary ally in Iraq, the United Kingdom, did not attend the planning session because it reportedly disagrees with a military strike on Iran. London also suspects the U.S. wants to move British troops from Basra in southern Iraq to the Baghdad area to help put down an expected surge in Sh'ia violence in Sadr City and other Sh'ia areas in central Iraq when the U.S. attacks Iran as well as clear the way for a U.S. military strike across the Iraqi-Iranian border aimed at securing the huge Iranian oil installations in Abadan. U.S. allies South Korea, Australia, Kuwait, Jordan, Italy, Netherlands, and Japan were also left out of the USS John F. Kennedy planning discussions because of their reported opposition to any strike on Iran.

In addition, Israel has been supplied by the United States with 500 "bunker buster" bombs. According to White House sources, the Israeli Air Force will attack Iran's nuclear facility at Bushehr with the U.S. bunker busters.The joint U.S.-Israeli pre-emptive military move against Iran reportedly was crafted by the same neo-conservative grouping in the Pentagon and Vice President Dick Cheney's office that engineered the invasion of Iraq.

Morale aboard the USS John F. Kennedy is at an all-time low, something that must be attributable to the knowledge that the ship will be involved in an extension of U.S. military actions in the Persian Gulf region. The Commanding Officer of an F-14 Tomcat squadron was relieved of command for a reported shore leave "indiscretion" in Dubai and two months ago the Kennedy's commanding officer was relieved for cause.

The White House leak about the planned attack on Iran was hastened by concerns that Russian technicians present at Bushehr could be killed in an attack, thus resulting in a wider nuclear confrontation between Washington and Moscow. International Atomic Energy Agency representatives are also present at the Bushehr facility. In addition, an immediate Iranian Shahab ballistic missile attack against Israel would also further destabilize the Middle East. The White House leaks about the pre-emptive strike may have been prompted by warnings from the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency that an attack on Iran will escalate out of control. Intelligence circles report that both intelligence agencies are in open revolt against the Bush White House.

White House sources also claimed they are "terrified" that Bush wants to start a dangerous war with Iran prior to the election and fear that such a move will trigger dire consequences for the entire world.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7113.htm
 

assoholic

New member
Aug 30, 2004
1,625
0
0
..imho, I would not discount the possibility of a military strike to take out Irans Nuclear facilities, an invasion is unlikely. They are too over extended now. The other day I heard on CNN approx 800 Guardsman have not shown up for their deployment overseas.
 

langeweile

Banned
Sep 21, 2004
5,086
0
0
In a van down by the river
IMHO,
America has more than enough troops. If not for poltical reason what are all those soldiers doing in Europe.
It is time for Europeans to step up to the plate and defend their own country. The "free ride" on my tax dollars should stop.
Politicially not a smart move.Fiscally yes.
 

assoholic

New member
Aug 30, 2004
1,625
0
0
..Nato was set up by the US in part to keep the Europeans in line, or at least relegate them to very Junior partners status. I do no think the Pentagion would actually like to see Europe become more independant militarily because they migjht start questioning their junior partner status.

As a side note France pulled out of NATO afther they found out the US had been in negotiations with the group that tried to assassinate De Gaulle for pulling out of Algeria. The US did not instigate the coup but told them they would recognize it if they successfully whacked De Gaulle, so once France found out about that they pulled out.
 
Jan 24, 2004
1,279
0
0
The Vegetative State
WoodPeckr said:
Some scary reading because it is possible.
That's taking a very liberal view of the word "possible."

If Bush invades Iran in the next week, I'll eat my hat. Not even he rises to that level of stupidity.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,500
4,906
113
langeweile said:
It is time for Europeans to step up to the plate and defend their own country.
You really believe the US troops are in Europe to defend Europe?
From bloody whom?
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
danmand said:
You really believe the US troops are in Europe to defend Europe?
From bloody whom?
Originally it was the communist threat.

Now it seems they are there to just spend money
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
Re: Whatever...

Cinema Face said:
You Lefties never change.

I wonder what stories you'll make up next.
Not me Bud

I am further right the most.

But I do think with the current attitude of the EU, I would withdraw the troops and close the bases

Let the war break out in Europe that our presence has been holding off.
 

davidmarch

Member
Sep 23, 2004
51
0
6
War Against Iran

Remember the Iranian Hostage crisis, where the U.S. was embarassed internationally? Well, I'm sure they don't!!!
I beleive that the U.S. will attack Iran, but AFTER George W is re-elected! They will also attack Syria at some point too!
George W will win the election, no matter what, even if there has to be a re-count in his Brother's State of Florida again(wink-wink), he will win. Where has democracy gone????
 

ocean976124

Arrogant American Idiot
Oct 28, 2002
1,291
0
36
USA
Yes, its possible. Clinton almost bombed Iran back to the stone-age during 1996...
 

ClitLover

Member
Jun 13, 2004
101
0
16
Hi every1,

I don't think a U.S. attack on Iran will happen. I think there will be a tight race, but no wars or terrorist attacks.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
DonQuixote said:
The author worked in the National Security Council under
Reagan.

The US has a long history of pulling this type of mission.

Presidents from both parties have been involved in these
kinds of things.

If it sounds improbable it may very well be true.

Don
My thoughts exactly, plus there is that Israeli connection. Israel would be only to willing to 'help' in this regard.

Israel May Have Iran in Its Sights: Increasingly concerned about Iran's nuclear program, Israel is weighing its options and has not ruled out a military strike to prevent the Islamic Republic from gaining the capability to build atomic weapons, according to policymakers, military officials, analysts and diplomats.

More on Israeli motives can be found here:

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/latimests/20041022/ts_latimes/israelmayhaveiraninitssights
 

Malibook

New member
Nov 16, 2001
4,613
2
0
Paradise
www.yourtraveltickets.com
There is no way the US will strike Iran before the election in 10 days.

Such an attack at this point would help Kerry tremendously.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Israel attack Iran some time after the election but the US is not even remotely close to this point.

The author of this wild speculation is full of shit IMHO.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Iran was always a bigger problem than Saddam in Iraq. Team Dubya may have just noted this, Dubya's dad knew it way back in Oil War I, and it was one of the reasons for him pulling back and not overthrowing Saddam back then.

Dad of Dubya, realized back then that if Saddam as bad as he was, is taken out during the first Oil War, Iraq would become another Iran as the Shihite Muslims took over control of Iraq from the Sunni Muslims. Then we would have two Iran's to deal with instead of one, as both became fundamentalist Muslim nations with the same goals.
 

Malibook

New member
Nov 16, 2001
4,613
2
0
Paradise
www.yourtraveltickets.com
DonQuixote said:
Is he off on the entire article?
Is he off on the timeing of the attack?
Is he off on the specifics of the attack, ie. the USS JFK?

How is he off?
How is he on?
He is off on the "pre-election" and "imminent".
Anything is possible but to suggest that it is imminent seems ludicrous.

I don't doubt that there are plans and that the hawks would like this to happen.
Some of these psychotic extremist hawks make Bush look quite moderate.

Undecided voters and those who might change their minds would not be moved towards a vote for Bush by such an unprovoked attack.
If Iran gives them a reason it would be the best thing that could happen for Bush.
 

langeweile

Banned
Sep 21, 2004
5,086
0
0
In a van down by the river
bbking said:
Another very foolish comment by langeweile. He thinks he is funny but he ain't.

I don't know what internal polls this reporter is seeing, but an expansion of the Iraq war into Iran will not be well recieved by the American people. Almost all polling on Iraq indicates that the American people are concerned that the US Government has mis-calculated the situtation in Iraq - this will almost for sure complicate that. While the American people are very willing to give the POTUS the benefit of the doubt, making the situtation more complicated will not benefit the Bush Administration.

Bottom line - it won't happen before Nov.02/04, way too much downside risk.



bbk
BBK you need to relax my good old friend.......life is too short to be uptight all the time....breath in....breath out...breath in...breath out....fell better...see that wasn't so hard.
 

Ickabod

New member
Oct 13, 2001
327
0
0
59
Heather Elite
Re: Whatever...

Cinema Face said:
You Lefties never change.

I wonder what stories you'll make up next.
No doubt. They'll probably start getting really stupid and telling us Saddam had ties to 9/11....or that there were all these weapons of mass destruction floating around Iraq or something. Damn leftists anyways.

Don't trust 'em as far as i can throw 'em.
 
W

WhOiSyOdAdDy?

When will the Americans pick a fight with someone who can fight back?

... like North Korea
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts