7 Birthers to speak a the RNC convention
- Thread starter Fred Zed
- Start date
I've never seen an emptier shirt then Mitt Romney(John Kerry was close) running for president in my life time.I truly believe he'll bend to whatever interests would give him the"better deal" if he won.He would take further steps to turn the U.S into a obligarchy.
Is a much more dramatic headline than "Two Birthers to speak. . ." However it is certainly a stretch to describe Governors Huckabee, Scott and Jindal as "Birthers" likewise Attorney General Olens, and Representative Rodgers.
Next Jan when all the kenyans records are unsealed, the investigations can begin in earnest.
Whole lot of progs going to besoiling their panties when that happens.
.
Whole lot of progs going to besoiling their panties when that happens.
.
You have an odd, dare I say , "queer" fantasy life.
Word is that your kenyan gets 'debriefed' regularly at his favourite 'down low' mens only club.
.
Every single Birther is a racist, 100% scum. And I don't care if its true or not, it refers to a racist piece of shit part of the constitution and if any of these assholes had the tiniest bit of a soul they'd put thier energies into removing that idiotic part of the constitution instead of trying make asses of themselves.
What a sad little prog you are.
The US Constitution is there for a reason, and once the muslame squatter is ejected in Nov then America can get back to business.
Glad it bothers you.
.
..... and anyone who uses both sides of their brain knows that the Constitution is a guide, not a crutch, as many use it. It's not written in stone and has be changed as times and society change. You were apparently oblivious to those long discussion in past threads.
Still with the vacuous Kenyan and muslim accusation I see, but we've gotten use to that.
However, the Constitutional Convention did not agree with you, and adopted the provision for a good reason. Further, there is absolutely no serious interest in removing the provision.
But since no court in the land thinks that Obama does not satisfy it...it really is just an academic point. Unless you agree with Mr. Galt's and Mr. Trump's assertions about the president...
Academic point.
However, as said before the combination of the unique laws of the State of Hawaii, and the initial attitude of the Obama Campaign/Administration, helped of course by the fact that for the first two years of the Administration there was a "lap dog" House of Representatives, which applied no pressure as to "please show us," has given this whole issue legs, when it should have been laid to rest in January of 2009.
I have no idea whether you are serious or just trying to be funny or provocative but the very sad fact is that your professed views are shared by an alarming percentage of the GOP.
Considering there are unique laws in a number of US states about a whole whack load of issue, the fact that Hawaii has one regarding birth records is nothing special, except that it makes the whining going on just that.
As for the two years of silence in the House, so what. Maybe it was more a case of, 'if we ignore them maybe those whiny kids will stfu', but apparently not.
Even if they did show it , there would still be those 25%'ers who'd claim it was forged and will never be quiet about it.
