22 killed, dozens wounded across several locations in Lewiston, Maine: Live updates

[basketcase]

You still haven't looked at the Criminal Code I see.

You just can't bring yourself to look at what the Criminal Code says about the use of force by police and Case Law and just go by how you think the police should operate.

The documentation of your unwillingness, or laziness to conduct any factual research continues unabated.

I'll give you a million dollars if you show me the part of the criminal code that says police officers should shoot suspects instead of arresting them.

 

[poorboy]

I'll give you a million dollars if you show me the part of the criminal code that says police officers should shoot suspects instead of arresting them.

You changed your original question yet again and you don't have that kind of money. People who have worked hard know the value of one million dollars and would be willing to do the research to read a free public document or hire a lawyer for far less than a million to do it for them who would and also give them the supporting case law of multiple cases where the police have justifiably shot someone without arrest.

Do some work yourself instead of making ludicrous statements.

 

[basketcase]

You changed your original question yet again and you don't have that kind of money. People who have worked hard know the value of one million dollars and would be willing to do the research to read a free public document or hire a lawyer for far less than a million to do it for them who would and also give them the supporting case law of multiple cases where the police have justifiably shot someone without arrest.

Do some work yourself instead of making ludicrous statements.

Again, you made the claim that Lam was wrong to not shoot the incel. When called on it you claimed the Criminal code said he should have.

....


As stated before, Constable Lam FAILED to do his job. He never received any commendations from Toronto Police or any awards from any level of government for his actions. Lam was not prepared. He was more than justified to shoot and kill a person who just committed mass murder and was posturing to shoot him and was lucky Minassian didn't have a firearm or he would be a dead man. Lam did not shoot because he was incompetent and did not have a round in the chamber like he was supposed to. You talk about a person not being able to handle stress, and the associated adrenaline and cortisol effects? That was Constable Lam that day. It's clearly captured on video. Go find a Toronto Police officer, any Toronto Police officer and ask about Lam. Not a single one will say he performed properly.

You're warping the narrative.

You might think that proper policing means shooting unarmed suspects; thankfully most cops are competent.



btw. A million isn't much money right now; the average home in Toronto is above that

 

[poorboy]

Again, you made the claim that Lam was wrong to not shoot the incel. When called on it you claimed the Criminal code said he should have.


You might think that proper policing means shooting unarmed suspects; thankfully most cops are competent.



btw. A million isn't much money right now; the average home in Toronto is above that

Proper policing means following the laws, which can include shooting an unarmed person and not a belief of some guy who doesn't know anything about the law thinks what the police should do.

Your statement shows your refusal to look at the Criminal Code or spending a fraction of that million you claim to have lying around to consult a lawyer who can refer you to case law.

What's this now, the tenth time that you've been told to look at the laws of Canada? Other than pure laziness, is there an issue around reading a free public document?

 

[basketcase]

Proper policing means following the laws, which can include shooting an unarmed person ...

So show me where the Criminal Code says proper police work is to shoot suspects they know are unarmed and not currently a threat.

p.s It's pretty hard to find a section of the Criminal code that doesn't exist.

 

[poorboy]

So show me where the Criminal Code says proper police work is to shoot suspects they know are unarmed and not currently a threat.

p.s It's pretty hard to find a section of the Criminal code that doesn't exist.

See previous post.

Read the Criminal Code or hire a lawyer. I've told you multiple times in multiple threads over the years I'm sick and tired of spoon feeding you publicly available free information.

Your laziness is well documented and seems to have no limits.

 

[basketcase]

See previous post.

Read the Criminal Code or hire a lawyer. I've told you multiple times in multiple threads over the years I'm sick and tired of spoon feeding you publicly available free information.

Your laziness is well documented and seems to have no limits.

Why would I pay a lawyer to look up something that doesn't exist?

All you're doing is showing you know how full of shit you are in claiming proper police work means shooting suspects who aren't a threat.