This is really hard to read and confusing, I probably read it over 10 times still trying to understand it. Are you asking if why it seems to be so one-sided?Do SP's share reference about OP's?
I only book very early (8am) meetings as my work hours normally runs late with no set end time
and I wanted to book one today for later this week (Tuesday) and after the pleasantly back and forth I was told to pay a deposit for a such early booking, I responded with I wasn't a particular fan of that for privacy reasons (based on what I have read in here) and also I would confirm the night before if needed.
but the Sp who has a good reputation, so I didn't say no, and the response was very unkind and not particularly solution based.
I'm a very respectful person, I read the ad, follow them to the teeth when I communicating with SP,'s I ask about boundaries so no accidental over stepping etc. simply because I want to treat people like I want to be treated myself.
So I was thinking we OP's shares reviews and experiences in here, but does SP's do the same and if not, why?
They absolutely do screen and keep information about clients. It's just usually much less visible and not in a YELP style review like it seems to be here.
A provider has substantially more at stake in identifying a potentially unsafe, unreliable, abusive, or boundary-pushing client than a client does in identifying someone who was merely difficult to communicate with. Research interviews with Canadian sex workers describe screening as an important part of deciding whether someone is safe and legitimate to meet.
There are also private referral networks where providers share information about problematic clients. But publicly publishing identifiable client reviews creates a completely different set of risks: privacy, outing someone, retaliation, defamation, harassment, and potentially putting the provider herself at risk.





