Charlie Kirk Shot in the Neck in Utah (Update: Shooter Alt-right links)
- Thread starter lir2016
- Start date
Or you just choose to ignore it...Probably could go on all day but I don't want to watch this filth
One of the better posts in this thread that will fly right over most of posters heads I'm sure.
Here's another one who constantly cries about racism, all while engaging in hate herself
nypost.com
Ilhan Omar cruelly stomps on Charlie Kirk’s legacy: ‘Full of s–t’
“Squad” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) went on a cruel rant about murdered conservative activist Charlie Kirk, scoffing at the notion that his core mission was to have a civil debate on poli…
nypost.com
I listened to 1.5 minutes. In those 90 seconds here were his mistakes:
1. The lady talks about subjective opinions. He asks her if they are having a conversation in that moment, to which she responds in the affirmative. He says, so there are things that are objective. That is dishonest because she is specifically talking about opinions.
2. He asks if murder is objectively wrong. She says yes. Then he says then abortion is wrong. Whether or not you consider abortion as murder, that is HIS opinion. Not a matter of scientific fact. HIS opinion. He presented his opinion as fact, which was her criticism in the first place, that he does that all the time.
That was just the first 90 seconds.
She is 100% right and speaking the truth.Here's another one who constantly cries about racism, all while engaging in hate herself
Ilhan Omar cruelly stomps on Charlie Kirk’s legacy: ‘Full of s–t’
“Squad” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) went on a cruel rant about murdered conservative activist Charlie Kirk, scoffing at the notion that his core mission was to have a civil debate on poli…
I’m so confused where she “cruelly stomped on Charlie Kirk’s legacy.” Everything she said was right. Such snowflakes
No, she's not speaking the truth.
Everyone in the US has freedom speech and the right to have an opinion.
Nobody has the right to kill someone if you disagree with that opinion.
If you dont like what he has to say, change the channel.
Anyone who makes excuses for this killing (like you are doing) is part of the problem
Show me the quote where she said that anyone had the right to kill Charlie Kirk.
And neither she nor I made excuses for his killing or said he deserved it.
Those were words that no one used
Lying is not an argument.
I already answered that.
You're both insinuating he had it coming. But you wont own up to it
Nope we didn't.
I asked for evidence for that accusation, and you are yet to provide it.
No you didn’t. Because you can’t. I know reading isn’t your strong suit but try reading the actual article and not just the headline before you post
Typical non IQ reply of a kool aid drinking member of the Democratic Party of Hatred
I’ve wasted enough of my superior intelligence on low level slumming with democratic haters. Enjoy your consumption of bigotry, racism, and hatred. I’m too good to waste my precious time and dignity on slumming. Ciao baby
Last edited:
America is a savage country, kids get shot up and nobody does shit, everyone has guns but no mental healthcare, 2 million people are locked up and part of the prison industrial complex, most people in jail are there for minor offenses but because they are too poor to afford bail they have to stay in jail.
Why is Charlie Kirk's death not just acceptable collateral damage like the 4 kids that died in a school shooting in Colorado that happened on the same day?
Why is Charlie Kirk's death not just acceptable collateral damage like the 4 kids that died in a school shooting in Colorado that happened on the same day?
Because dead kids in school do not bring vote to Trump so he does not give a shit.
But the worst is that it's Trump party that eliminated Kirk.
Other then that I completely agree with your post. The US is a savage, successful business country.
