Recent content by inthebutt

Illuminati is correct to an extent. But in a high profile case like this, a lot of the information can be found online on news articles, such as the crown's theory as to how 3 people drowned 4 people. You'd assume it would be in the closing argument. Let me know if you find anything. I...

I'm sure I would have tried to get out, but that doesn't mean they would have. 3 of them had bruises on their heads, they're shaken up, water is rushing in making it harder to force yourself out. In a panic anything could have happened. The fact that they did not escape does not prove that...

Crown asserted that's what happened without providing a story of how it happened, where it happened, who took part in it. Defenses' closing arguments focused on this as well, but their mistake was they didn't have a solid story that they stuck to from the start, while the crown didn't have that...

He can think they deserved death all he wants, but that still does not prove he planned and killed them. Saying someone deserves death, or deserved death does not necessarily mean we would cause death.

Scoldings lead to drownings because the scolding is what drove the girls to defiantly rebel against him and run off with the car for a joy ride, which led to the death. Before he saw the cell phone pictures, and before the wiretaps were placed, he was blaming himself for their deaths, which...

I was not there and I am also going by the limited information given in news articles. Certainly not arguing for the innocence of the convicted, I believe all 3 are guilty of something, but based on the limited info I've gotten from the news, it was not proven that all 3 are guilty of first...

The accused’s side of the story didn’t add up from day one, and they were hiding something. That doesn’t prove murder. To me, the parents lying to protect their son, makes sense. The son lying to hide his guilt or whatever happened that night makes sense. Setting up the wiretap really should...