Iranian negotiators bragged to the US ones that they had enough material for 11 Nuclear bombs.

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
109,500
33,026
113
I understand entrenched racism whoever the target group may be.
I am saying that while it is true that some may be resorting to blaming all Jews for the actions of Israel, and using that to caricature or slander or attack them, which would be antisemitic, it is also true that all criticism of Israel is now branded antisemitic.
Crying antisemitism is all that zionists have left in defence of Israel.
But all they are doing is creating antisemitism by arguing that all Jews are genocidal zionists.

You are not the good guys if you did this to a walled in area with 1 million children.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
43,830
10,121
113
There not lying, Iran has untapped uranium deposits, with neighboring Kazakhstan having the largest deposits. The USA depends on Canada which has the second largest uranium deposits after Kazakhstan. Poor Bibi has none, he'll have to kiss Carney's ring.


Trump will invade us next.
 
  • Love
Reactions: SaulGoodman777

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
31,138
65,813
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Bullshit.
Netanyahu repeatedly refused to agree to terms to return the hostages, Hamas repeatedly offered.
Most of the killing on Oct 7 was done by Israel we now know as well. Only Israel had the heavy artillery that killed so many.
Insane post of the year nominee..
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
26,822
4,701
113
The inspectors said they didn't find evidence. Doesn't mean there isn't.

The Nuclear watchdog also said:

"Grossi said the IAEA could not exclude the possibility that there was intelligence concerning Iran's ambitions that had not been shared with the agency.

He also noted that IAEA inspectors have lacked access to key Iranian facilities for more than eight months, meaning the agency cannot verify whether nuclear material has been diverted for military purposes."
Ahh yes another WMD type lie. At this point Iran will either 1 collapse (25% chance) or develop nukes (75% chance)
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
26,822
4,701
113
Insane post of the year nominee..
Nope that was actually confirmed in the Israeli press. Witnesses also confirmed this. If you look at a lot of the damage done it was caused by weapons that Hamas did not have. They only had light weapons and some RPGs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
20,527
11,267
113
Bingo!
I've always said this.
Nukes work to keep the peace.
MAD works.
But this is exactly what countries like the US and Israel don't want.
They want the leverage to coerce nations which justifies these nations getting nukes even more.
Your ignorance knows no bounds...😆 🤣 😂 😹
 
  • Love
Reactions: SaulGoodman777

seanzo

Well-known member
Nov 29, 2008
686
1,009
93
It matters because it debunks the narrative that they are not building Nukes...they are...
Who cares? Really, what's the big deal? Worst case they nuke Israel, in which case nothing of value is lost. So again, who cares if they are trying to build a nuke
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
20,527
11,267
113
Who cares? Really, what's the big deal? Worst case they nuke Israel, in which case nothing of value is lost. So again, who cares if they are trying to build a nuke
LMAO...spoken like someone who has no clue of the Middle East. And if Israel is of nothing of value, why do Iran, Hezbollah and the surrounding extremists want to annihilate it so bad?
 

seanzo

Well-known member
Nov 29, 2008
686
1,009
93
LMAO...spoken like someone who has no clue of the Middle East. And if Israel is of nothing of value, why do Iran, Hezbollah and the surrounding extremists want to annihilate it so bad?
Because the Zionists are going to destroy the dome of the rock and build the third temple so they can usher in the apocalypse and bring Jesus back to earth so all the Jews who live in Israel can go to heaven or some retarded shit like that. Hezbollah literally formed because Israel was slaughtering Shia in South Lebanon during the Lebanese civil war. They have perfectly logical reasons to want them gone
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
5,311
7,212
113
Dude the mullahs actually believe they are going to get 72 virgins when they die That's who you're dealing with.
You should know that the whole 72 virgin thing is not really something Shia's believe, that's more of a Sunni muslim belief, and it isn't really mainstream. Iran is majority Shias. But, I shouldn't be surprised that you are ignorant of these things, and would throw out sensational bullshit.

The point here is that even if someone believes they will be rewarded in the afterlife doesn't mean they would want to cause the deaths of MILLIONS, including their own people. You might want to pretend they are evil (and, well....maybe they are) but they aren't necessarily psychotic and willing to take everyone with them.
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
5,311
7,212
113
Israel has nukes and hamas still test them every single time. So does hezbollah and if you able to figure it out...Iran particularly the IRGC and regime... just like Obama bombing Libya...
So, you obviously don't understand what nuclear deterent is. I understand, its a difficult concept. I'll try to level it down so even a five year old could understand:
Nuclear weapons could possibly be used if Israel was near defeat. Like say all the countries surrounding it decided to invade at the same time and were achieving success, and allies like the US decided to do nothing to help.

Terror attacks like Hamas or Hezbollah are bad. But who would Israel nuke, even if they wanted to? Lebanon? Iran? What would the result of that be? Israel would be a global pariah. They would be responsible for the death of MILLIONS of people. The response would be so over the top that they would be shunned and their economy would be destroyed. You seem to not understand the seriousness of using a nuclear weapon. It is literally the last thing any rational people would do. And, I include North Korea and Iran (if they were ever able to build one).

Now, looking at you talking about Obama launching bombing attacks against Libya...I honestly don't know what they fuck you're talking about. Libya doesn't have nukes. And, George Bush didn't nuke Afghanistan after the 9/11 terror attacks...

You literally make no sense. But I'm not surprised....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
5,311
7,212
113
Bingo!
I've always said this.
Nukes work to keep the peace.
MAD works.
But this is exactly what countries like the US and Israel don't want.
They want the leverage to coerce nations which justifies these nations getting nukes even more.
While I would prefer NOBODY had nukes, you aren't wrong. Ever wonder why North Korea can fuck around all that it wants with little push back from anyone? While allies might impose sanctions on them, they still go about doing what they want. NK has made it clear they would nuke Seoul if anyone tried to invade or assassinate the glorious leader.

But, as I've said in this thread, nuclear weapons are a last resort. I cannot see anyone trying for a first strike, because the fallout would likely be the end of civilization. Though it would probably reverse climate change by causing a nuclear winter/ice age....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts