A little methane with your CO2, sir?
- Thread starter mburner
- Start date
2 plus more years and all the nonsense and bullshit Trump has created will be wiped out.
Co2 is not the control knob for our extremely complex, non -linear , chaotic and dynamic climate system
one should also consider exactly what The Environmental Protection Agency accomplished with their foolish ruling that co2, the gas that all life depends on, was somehow a deadly threat
they certainly did not stop the accumulation of co2 in the atmosphere
you might also ponder the 2020 pandemic lock down , where human activity and human co2 generation was severely constrained
and there is no observable change in the rate of c02 accumulation in the atmosphere, despite the lock down
No amount of regulation, Carbon taxes, EV Mandates, restrictions on personal freedoms, ignorant Swedish teenagers, face gluing to the pavements or any other foolish climate action is going to change the rate of c02 accumulation in the atmosphere
the good news is that Co2 is not the control knob for our extremely complex, non -linear , chaotic and dynamic climate system
The NASA kids explanation of the Greenhouse effect is likely too hard for you to understand, but give it a try.
See if you can follow the science or tell us where they went wrong without just declaring it 'propaganda'.
What Is the Greenhouse Effect? - NASA Science
Watch this video to learn about the greenhouse effect!
science.nasa.gov
And how should governments fight climate change. By banning gas powered law mowers but not private jets or super yachts.
really ?
if true, then you would be able to explain why there was no change in the rate of CO2 due to massive restrictions on human activity in 2020
please explain?
a follow up question for you: what level of restrictions on human activity would be required to stop the accumulation of C02 ?
locking down 1/2 of the worlds population did not work
my guess is you will run away from that question just as fast as you can
however if my guess about you is wrong , then i would be most interested to see your responses to those very specific question put to you.
Last edited:
The NASA kids explanation of the Greenhouse effect is likely too hard for you to understand, but give it a try.
See if you can follow the science or tell us where they went wrong without just declaring it 'propaganda'.
What Is the Greenhouse Effect? - NASA Science
Watch this video to learn about the greenhouse effect!
you really should try to elevate your science understanding above videos intended to deliberately mislead children
no doubt the will be some children who will rightfully question the intentional deceit
where does that rank you?
our extremely complex, chaotic, non-linear, dynamic climate system has always changed and likely will continue to change
there is no ' fighting ' that
It ranks you as a total kook, someone who thinks NASA is propaganda.
It puts you in the category of people who think the moon landing was faked and the earth is flat.
Well done.
Look, buddy, you're not smart enough to even understand the kids Greenhouse page at NASA.
There is zero chance you can understand the climate and climate modelling.
Just admit it.
You aren't bright enough for this debate.
Just because its too complex and chaotic for you to understand doesn't mean that smarter people can't understand it.
a buddy is someone i respect
you are not my buddy
our climate system is far too complex to be modelled properly
they do not know how to model cloud formation or turbulence, so they just do not bother or make a guess
i have forgotten more than you will ever understand
you do not have the very first clue about what you speak
Frankfooter: you should not lecture others on issues you do not understand
Last edited:
You think you are respected, buddy?
Again, while its nice that you admit your inability to understand things that doesn't mean that smarter people can't figure it out.
Now that you've admitted you can't understand it you should leave it to the experts.
the great larue has spoken
the great larue has spoken
As for the AI, this is what AI says about its own findings.
Your reliance on AI just shows more ignorance.
AI Overview
AI models frequently produce inconsistent or opposite findings on repeated queries due to their
probabilistic (non-deterministic) nature and design as creative text generators rather than rigid databases. Studies indicate that AI search tools can provide conflicting answers over 60% of the time, often confidently presenting incorrect information.
- Probabilistic "Hallucinations": AI models operate on probability, not true understanding, which can lead to making assumptions, misinterpreting data, or even generating opposite information to the source they are citing.
