Everyone’s entitled to share their experience, that’s the whole point of the forum. But let’s not pretend a –1 means the same thing across the board. Calling it a negative because you booked a domme expecting a GFE is like ordering an espresso and then complaining it isn’t sweet enough. The experience wasn’t bad it just wasn’t what you were looking for.
I think a lot of people misunderstand what this list was actually meant for. Originally, it was supposed to be a safe-bet guideline women who are consistently warm, professional, and make clients feel comfortable. It was never about promising specific services or catering to one style of experience. A negative can be constructive if it reflects genuine issues like attitude or service quality. But docking someone because they’re not delivering a fantasy they never offered? That’s unfair.
Respectfully, I don’t understand why OP booked with Sheva if he wasn’t looking for a domme session. She’s incredibly transparent about what she offers, even a two-minute glance at her Twitter makes that clear. This isn’t about defending her or invalidating his experience; it’s about reminding people that the +/– system carries weight. These threads influence business and reputations, and that deserves more discernment.
If someone’s rude or cold, sure, that’s relevant. But a mismatch in preference doesn’t make it a ‘bad session.’ It just means it wasn’t your cup of tea. So by all means, share your experience…just make sure you’re rating the right criteria before you impact someone’s livelihood.
Anyway, that’s all I meant just context, not conflict. I care about fairness in how we talk about each other’s work, because words travel farther than people think.
Last edited:
