Charlie Kirk Shot in the Neck in Utah (Update: Shooter Alt-right links)

[40micmic]

Charlie Kirk once said passing the Civil Rights Act was a 'huge mistake'

The conservative activist's quote about the landmark legislation circulated online after he was fatally shot in September 2025.

www.snopes.com

So this is why one side is losing because they never give a full picture. And people are beginning to wake up to that and doing their own DD.

He has explained what he meant on several different debates on campus, on his podcast, etc. Just one example below:

What Charlie Kirk actually said about the civil rights act.

Bekijk je favoriete video's, luister naar de muziek die je leuk vindt, upload originele content en deel alles met vrienden, familie en anderen op YouTube.

www.youtube.com

 

[40micmic]

Did Charlie Kirk Say the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Was a Mistake? — Anthony Delgado

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is one of the most important laws in American history, dismantling segregation and prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, and national origin. Because of its moral and historical weight, any critique of the Act draws immediate attention. So,

www.anthonydelgado.net

The left never provides the entire picture and just relies on a 10 sec soundbyte or "misquoting" someone they want to defame. Its a carefully curated narrative.

 

[Frankfooter]

That must be it...case closed! you solved it franky .

It does explain so much.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1946638799682859387

 

[The Oracle]

Your article confirms that Kirk said the Civil Rights Act was a mistake.
Its just MAGA trying to argue why killing civil rights is really a great idea.

My posting was the truth...Doesn't matter where it lies. Nobody is absolutely right about every single thing they say.

This is a concept which you and your handlers will never grasp.

 

[40micmic]

Your article confirms that Kirk said the Civil Rights Act was a mistake.
Its just MAGA trying to argue why killing civil rights is really a great idea.

You're doing as well for Kirk as this guy.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1966647512820834347

You really have a hard time putting pieces together. The argument Kirk makes is the intent was good and noble, the laws that were written were way to broad and allowed for the nobility of the act to be undermined.

But the left wing curated narrative continues to push that Kirk hates all blacks/minorities/women/gays/etc. The problem with the brain rot that the left has capitalized for years among their base is that people don't bother to fact check the headline anymore.

 

[Frankfooter]

The left never provides the entire picture and just relies on a 10 sec soundbyte or "misquoting" someone they want to defame. Its a carefully curated narrative.

For years the maple MAGA here have also declared that trump isn't racist, a conman and a pedo.
If you want to add to that team and say Kirk wasn't a white nationalist, that's your call.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1967677051109818842

 

[Frankfooter]

My posting was the truth...Doesn't matter where it lies. Nobody is absolutely right about every single thing they say.

This is a concept which you and your handlers will never grasp.

This isn't about whether Kirk's claim about the Civil Rights Act was right or wrong.
This is about pointing out that it fits with the rest of what he posted as being racist.

We still have people who think trump isn't racist and a rapist here too.

 

[The Oracle]

The left never provides the entire picture and just relies on a 10 sec soundbyte or "misquoting" someone they want to defame. Its a carefully curated narrative.

I was listening to Steven Crowder on Piers last night...He's hyperbolic but makes some good points..Especially on how all theses political violence stats are measured.

On another note I don't see any leftists on here sticking up for Pam Bondi assertion that she wants to go after people engaging in hate speech...Republican podcasters want her to step down immediately. They can see the damage that imposing hate speech laws can have.

 

[Frankfooter]

You really have a hard time putting pieces together. The argument Kirk makes is the intent was good and noble, the laws that were written were way to broad and allowed for the nobility of the act to be undermined.

But the left wing curated narrative continues to push that Kirk hates all blacks/minorities/women/gays/etc. The problem with the brain rot that the left has capitalized for years among their base is that people don't bother to fact check the headline anymore.

Like I said, you can call it out or you can defend his racism.
You can interpret it as you like, just as lots of people interpret trump and think he's smart and honest.
That comment fits a pattern.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1966544979276542223

 

[richaceg]

That is a disgrace to an educational institution.

Pro Hamas students locking up a library isn't, this is where you draw the line? it's making you upset again...

 

[Frankfooter]

Pro Hamas students locking up a library isn't, this is where you draw the line? it's making you upset again...

We know you won't draw the line at pedos, rapists or genocide.
Just people who want to stop that shite.

 

[richaceg]

So this is why one side is losing because they never give a full picture. And people are beginning to wake up to that and doing their own DD.

He has explained what he meant on several different debates on campus, on his podcast, etc. Just one example below:

What Charlie Kirk actually said about the civil rights act.

Bekijk je favoriete video's, luister naar de muziek die je leuk vindt, upload originele content en deel alles met vrienden, familie en anderen op YouTube.

www.youtube.com

Lefties always blow their wad too early...it's called "premature evaluation"...

 

[richaceg]

how fascist of you

except that didn't happen...Kimmel wasnt silenced / jailed...Funny how every accusation you make...Hamas and Iran actually are the ones doing what you hope Trump is doing...like every marxist..."confuse your opposition and accuse them of what you're doing while doing it"...

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Pro Hamas students locking up a library isn't, this is where you draw the line? it's making you upset again...

Students behaving unruly is a disciplinary issue.
The state promoting a vile grifter as a national hero is cultural degradation.
This is Handmaid's Tale level BS.

 

[richaceg]

Students behaving unruly is a disciplinary issue.

Not if they're financed - they're what exactly what you're trying to define as grifters.

 

[Butler1000]

Do you right wing guys not get the significance of the President of the United States shutting down comedians? Never mind all that Kimmel said was that Trump pivoted from the shooting question to his $200 million dollar White Hose Ballroom.

Right now you think it's all yayyyyyy.. fuck the lefties.

There is such wisdom in the following. And he was speaking of how the populist right wing government in pre-WW2 Germany started out slowly. Do you really want to live in a society that harnesses anyone's free speech? Because in the USA, all you right wing hobbyists could easily become the next group to be oprressed or jailed if the hobbiest Trump dies and the Christian Right and Stephen Miller and JD Vance have their way. All it takes is an Executive Order to circumvent the rules of law, search warrants etc and you'll be the one they are coming for.


First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

—Martin Niemöller

As I said. Watch what happens with the 2nd. The minute they start discussing that, especially if a few more shootings occur, then it's going to get mighty ugly.

 

[mandrill]

AOC doing a great job of twisting words.

Exhibit A

“We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was; a man who believed that the Civil Rights Act that granted Black Americans the right to vote was a mistake,”

Didnt bother reading the rest...

How exactly did AOC "twist Kirk's words"?

 

[richaceg]

Lefties : OMG they're trying to Ban Jimmy Kimmell basically attacking his 1st ammendment right!!!
Also Lefties when Twitter Banned Trump:

You guys have no more legs to stand on...lol...

 

[Frankfooter]

Lefties always blow their wad too early...it's called "premature evaluation"...

Whereas you are willing to back someone forever, just liking them more as you find out they are pedos, rapists, conman, felons or just support genocide on a people you hate.

 

[Butler1000]

I find it very ironic that for the last 10-15 years anyone who dared to speak out against LGBT issues got right away canceled by the Left, but now that the shoe's on the other foot and Lefties are getting canceled, you suddenly whine about freedom of speech.

Its also very hypocritical

There is a world of difference because targets matter. It's punching down vs punching up.

But yes personally I disagree with "canceling" . And I do now. Especially when it involves mocking the President. In fact the head of the FCC is directly using the ability to affect licensing and mergers to create a censorship environment. And that is as authoritarian, in the best Chinese way, as it gets.

Phil, if this hears up any more, or you hear this administration discussing the 2nd amendment, pull your USA investments. Or downgrade them. I have now reached the point, where I am reconsidering a direct flight to Mexico, as it would involve flying over them, and that is how low my trust is now.