Russia Tries Again to Expand LNG Exports Upended by Sanctions

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,970
2,558
113
Ghawar
June 29, 2025
Stephen Stapczynski

Russia is taking another crack at expanding exports of liquefied natural gas after US sanctions stalled efforts last year.

An LNG vessel has docked at the Arctic LNG 2 export facility for the first time since October, according to ship-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg and satellite images. The facility was supposed to be a cornerstone of Moscow’s goal to increase LNG exports threefold by 2030, but has been idle for months after struggling to find buyers willing to break western restrictions.

Russia has the pieces in place to meaningfully boost LNG exports as it expands its shadow fleet. Since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russian gas pipeline exports to Europe have dwindled, and shipping more fuel via seaborne LNG tankers provides an attractive revenue stream to fill Moscow’s coffers.

Shadow Fleet

At least 13 ships, including those that can navigate icy waters, have been marshaled to potentially service Arctic LNG 2, with some changing management companies several times to help obfuscate the actual owners. According to ship-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg they include:

  • Four ice-class vessels that can navigate the frozen waters around Arctic LNG 2. Three are currently idled in the Barents Sea, while another is the tanker currently docked at Arctic LNG 2
  • Three more traditional LNG vessels are in the Barents sea
  • Two vessels are under repair in China, with another that appears to be on the way
  • One vessel near a floating storage in Russia’s Far East
  • Two vessels are idled in the the Gulf of Finland. They had served another Russian facility called Portovaya, which was sanctioned by the US in January

“Russia does have more vessels at its disposal compared to the summer/fall of 2024,” Malte Humpert, founder of the Arctic Institute, a Washington-based think-tank, said in an email. “If it can find buyers, this small fleet should be sufficient to lift cargoes.”

Eight shipments were exported from Arctic LNG 2 between August and October 2024, but never docked on foreign shores. Instead, the gas was offloaded into two Russian storage units in the Barents Sea and its Far East region. Large-scale production halted in October after ice built up around the facility and made transport by traditional vessels challenging.

Russia’s first domestically built ice-class LNG tanker may come online in the second half of this year if it passes remaining sea trials, Interfax reported Wednesday, citing Sovcomflot Chief Executive Officer Igor Tonkovidov.

Willing Buyers?

Now, the market will be closely monitoring whether Arctic LNG 2 can find willing buyers. Exporting more would be a boon for consumers, as it would put pressure on global gas prices.

The Biden administration was diligent in sanctioning ships and companies connected with exporting fuel from Arctic LNG 2 last year. It isn’t clear if the Trump administration will be as strict, or if the government will slap restrictions on ports that accept the fuel. The threat of retaliation from the US kept buyers at bay last year.

Officials related to the Arctic LNG 2 joint venture have never stopped trying to sell the fuel, traveling to potential buyers in India and China over the last year, according to traders with knowledge of the matter. However, it isn’t clear if they have been able to secure any sales.

“The biggest obstacle remains finding a buyer and shipping capacity,” Jan-Eric Fahnrich, a senior analyst at Rystad Energy, said by email. “They will then circle around looking for buyers in Asia and Novatek will offer a discount.”

Majority shareholder Novatek PJSC and the operating venture Arctic LNG 2 did not respond to emails seeking comment.

Iris, the tanker currently docked at Arctic LNG 2, is a so-called Arc4 vessel, with a reinforced hull that allows it to navigate the shorter Arctic route to Asia when conditions allow in the summer. It is likely that the ship will make the journey, as Asia is home to buyers who may be willing to circumvent western restrictions.

“China would appear to be the most likely candidate, but with consistently declining Chinese demand for the past eight months this won’t be an easy task,” said the Arctic Institute’s Humpert. “The fact that more than one million cubic meters of LNG loaded last year remains unsold, and in floating storage, does not bode well for renewed attempts to market additional volumes this summer.”

Loading vessels at Arctic LNG 2 could also be necessary to ease brimming gas tanks. Satellite images taken June 25 indicate that two production trains at the facility are flaring, which indicates they could be operating or cooling down equipment. Without steady exports, the plant’s storage will quickly fill up, and lack of space was one of the reasons why Arctic LNG 2 stopped large-scale production in October.

Meanwhile, traders will wait to see if US or European officials further tighten restrictions on the facility as exports resume.

“Now is the time for increased pressure” on Russia’s energy revenues, said Geoffrey Pyatt, distinguished fellow at the Atlantic Council Global Energy Center and a former US assistant secretary of state who helped craft Arctic LNG 2 sanctions under the Biden administration. “European leaders have expressed new determination to end all imports of Russian gas, making it even more important that the United States maintains our pressure on Novatek.”

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,970
2,558
113
Ghawar
Zelensky sees sanctions against Moscow as a priority
29.06.2025


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is urging the international community to intensify sanctions against Russia, calling them a vital tool to curb Moscow’s war machine.

"Sanctions should now be one of the most important priorities - the world's sanctions against Russia," Zelensky said in his evening video address on Sunday.

The remarks followed his recent signing of a decree aligning Ukraine's sanctions policy with that of its international allies, including the European Union and G7. Zelensky also announced plans to adopt EU sanctions against Iran.

Despite the EU’s failure on Friday to approve its 18th sanctions package due to opposition from Slovakia, Zelensky called for a renewed effort.

Sanctions, he said, are something "that really limits Russia's strategic development opportunities, its potential,and should even more painfully limit Russia's ability to continue this war, the war against our independence, every day."

The EU sanctions are primarily directed against the Russian economy. They aim to deprive the country of the financial means to continue its war of aggression against Ukraine.

Russia, on the other hand, often emphasizes that it has adapted its economy to the punitive measures. It is also circumventing the restrictions with the help of other countries and has significantly expanded its arms production.

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,970
2,558
113
Ghawar
Sour grapes eh!! You don't want to give Zelenskyy and his military an oz. of credit do you?

You would be so much happier if Zelenskyy threw in the white towel, got on his knees and kissed Putin's ass yet you do not feel the same about Bibi's ass, how come?

That isn't why I felt NATO (and the EU) are the ones who
more deserve cheering. Between the people of Ukraine and
EU/NATO who do you think are more miserable over the
war at this point?

 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,741
17,824
113
That isn't why I felt NATO (and the EU) are the ones who
more deserve cheering. Between the people of Ukraine and
EU/NATO who do you think are more miserable over the
war at this point?

Yet all is fine with Putin sending every one of his souls through the meat grinder?? You know that guy called Putin who invaded a peaceful country?
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,970
2,558
113
Ghawar
Yet all is fine with Putin sending every one of his souls through the meat grinder?? You know that guy called Putin who invaded a peaceful country?
All is not fine with Putin which is what deserves your cheering
NATO for. NATO has been successful in giving Putin a hard time
through using Ukraine as its proxy in the war, never mind Zelensky
being the one who is to end up sending more souls to the meat
grinder.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,741
17,824
113
All is not fine with Putin which is what deserves your cheering
NATO for. NATO has been successful in giving Putin a hard time
through using Ukraine as its proxy in the war, never mind Zelensky
being the one who is to end up sending more souls to the meat
grinder.
Yes, because you would love to see Putin regain Ukraine to his heart's desire because he's such a good guy.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
24,973
2,979
113
Sour grapes eh!! You don't want to give Zelenskyy and his military an oz. of credit do you?

You would be so much happier if Zelenskyy threw in the white towel, got on his knees and kissed Putin's ass yet you do not feel the same about Bibi's ass, how come?
They are just the meat in the carnage sandwich.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
24,973
2,979
113
Is Putin at least putting mayo on his troops?
Actually he is putting some lettuce on them in the form of large financial incentives and compensation of families of the fallen. Signing bonuses of up to 36K euros. They have cancelled those now as they feel they have enough troops and losses have really plummeted. They also cut the defense budget for 2026.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,741
17,824
113
Actually he is putting some lettuce on them in the form of large financial incentives and compensation of families of the fallen. Signing bonuses of up to 36K euros. They have cancelled those now as they feel they have enough troops and losses have really plummeted. They also cut the defense budget for 2026.
Curious, why does the powerful Russian war machine need N.Korean troops to bolster their illegal invasion of a peaceful country?

This should be entertaining.

 
  • Like
Reactions: SchlongConery

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
24,973
2,979
113
Curious, why does the powerful Russian war machine need N.Korean troops to bolster their illegal invasion of a peaceful country?

This should be entertaining.

Russia has a mutual defense pact with NK. Word has it the Koreans wanted to give their troops field experience as it has been a very long time since they fought in a war and they have not fought with modern weapons. So they went there, were trained by the Russians on the current realities of modern combat, and they were sent into the field, to get "bloodied" as the military term goes. There was a contingent of senior NK officers at the V day parade, and Putin met them an actually hugged the senior general. (Putin is not exactly know to be the hugging type). Sure their men initially had high casualties, but apparently they are almost too gung ho, and learned from the experience. I am not sure if more are being rotated through. Why does the mighty US military get troops from all its poodles? The USA asks and asks AGGRESSIVELY.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,970
2,558
113
Ghawar
Curious, why does the powerful Russian war machine need N.Korean troops to bolster their illegal invasion of a peaceful country?
Why did Israel bring the U..S. air force into the conflict with Iran? Because
Netanyahu has the power to make Trump do things for him.

Putin doesn't likely have as much control over Kim as Netanyahu
of Trump. But if help is available why not take advantage of it?

Likewise if Zelensky had the kind of power and influence of Putin
and Netanyahu he would have made Starmer, Macron, Trudeau,
Carney, Biden and Trump Ukraine's attack dogs to bring down Putin.
But the reality is Zelensky has to know his place as NATO's janitor.
He and his administration can only stay on their gravy train so long
as they continue sending Ukrainians to get killed

Yes, because you would love to see Putin regain Ukraine to his heart's desire because he's such a good guy.
I have no idea at which point Putin and Russia will halt advancement into Ukraine.
But I doubt very much Putin will want to take over much more than the territories
already gained. I think it is next to impossible for Russia to take over Ukraine
and hold on to it logistically. That being said I think it is the pro-Ukraine crowd
who need to figure out what they they want out of funding a protracted war.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
24,973
2,979
113
BTW Russia has upped its production of Geran type drones to 500 per day, and expects to hit 1000/day this year. Staggering firepower.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: squeezer

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,741
17,824
113
Why did Israel bring the U..S. air force into the conflict with Iran? Because
Netanyahu has the power to make Trump do things for him.

Putin doesn't likely have as much control over Kim as Netanyahu
of Trump. But if help is available why not take advantage of it?

Likewise if Zelensky had the kind of power and influence of Putin
and Netanyahu he would have made Starmer, Macron, Trudeau,
Carney, Biden and Trump Ukraine's attack dogs to bring down Putin.
But the reality is Zelensky has to know his place as NATO's janitor.
He and his administration can only stay on their gravy train so long
as they continue sending Ukrainians to get killed



I have no idea at which point Putin and Russia will halt advancement into Ukraine.
But I doubt very much Putin will want to take over much more than the territories
already gained. I think it is next to impossible for Russia to take over Ukraine
and hold on to it logistically. That being said I think it is the pro-Ukraine crowd
who need to figure out what they they want out of funding a protracted war.
BTW Russia has upped its production of Geran type drones to 500 per day, and expects to hit 1000/day this year. Staggering firepower.
LMAO, the two Putin zealots have given their opinion.

Just curious, when was the last time either one of you returned to the homeland?
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,970
2,558
113
Ghawar
LMAO, the two Putin zealots have given their opinion.

Just curious, when was the last time either one of you returned to the homeland?
When are you going to Ukraine to join the fight against Putin?

I am a Canadian citizen. Canada is the one country I am and will
remain loyal to. I was critical of Trudeau's military aid to Ukraine
for the interest of my country. We could strengthen our nation's
defense against future Russian invasion into Canada with all the
money squandered on Zelensky. I put my country's interest above
my homeland.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,741
17,824
113
When are you going to Ukraine to join the fight against Putin?

I am a Canadian citizen. Canada is the one country I am and will
remain loyal to. I was critical of Trudeau's military aid to Ukraine
for the interest of my country. We could strengthen our nation's
defense against future Russian invasion into Canada with all the
money squandered on Zelensky. I put my country's interest above
my homeland.
Bullshit, if Russia invaded Canada you and Notti would be saying,

Canada deserves it because they taunted Russia.

Notti would be jumping up and down, cheering as N. Korean soldiers parachute in, and because Trump never left office, Trump himself would be helping Russia and N. Korea while you and Nottie cheer with a shot of vodka. Oh, those Russians.

As for me, going to Ukraine, I would rather my government send them aid. You, on the other hand, prefer to let them rot under Putin's foot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jsanchez

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,970
2,558
113
Ghawar
Bullshit, if Russia invaded Canada you and Notti would be saying,

Canada deserves it because they taunted Russia.

Notti would be jumping up and down, cheering as N. Korean soldiers parachute in, and because Trump never left office, Trump himself would be helping Russia and N. Korea while you and Nottie cheer with a shot of vodka. Oh, those Russians.
In the event of Russian invasion of Canada Russia will have to have conquered Ukraine and Northern Europe first before they move on to Canada. I am afraid it would more likely
be Ukrainian troops fighting alongside Russia invaders I would be coerced into cheering for as the liberators. Assuming Zelensky had not ended in the same fate of Mussolini
and was leading the Ukrainian troops I can imagine how I would be forced
to cheer him wearing a simple green T-shirt.

Seriously, building up defense for national security is more of an insurance
than preparation for defence against impending invasion. You don't have to
expect Putin to become vengeful on account of Trudeau's aid to Zelensky to
support more military spending.

As for me, going to Ukraine, I would rather my government send them aid. You, on the other hand, prefer to let them rot under Putin's foot.
Did giving away money to Ukraine to buy weapons like
Trudeau did has saved Ukraine from death and destruction
so far?
 
Toronto Escorts