No that's not how I tried to frame it and if it includes diversity quotas then that is the whole point. They exist and are used.
Newsflash: your organization has DEI and that's why you were hired and will soon be fired.
Some Advice To Mark Carney
- Thread starter niniveh
- Start date
Newsflash: your organization has DEI and that's why you were hired and will soon be fired.
That is exactly how you framed it and after getting caught with your foot in your mouth you are now backpedaling.
PS: While I do support the initiatives, DEI is for minorities, not for me. Looks like you were fired and replaced by a more qualified minority and are now venting. lmfao.
You started waffling about quotas existing and then not existing.
I cut/pasted your comments as proof.
You are lying. Again.
I'm very successfully self-employed with 2 businesses one of which I started, and the other I acquired. So your assumption is wrong. I hire based on qualifications and experience, not skin colour as your DEI policies pressure employers to do.
DEI hires like you wouldn't know how to employ themselves without someone giving them a job out of charity. You are the first to go once the cancel culture and virtue signaling begin to fade.
Explains why you are so nervous and sensitive.
I said DEI programs cannot be reduced to "hiring quotas" as you were doing and I repeatedly pointed that out.
So stop lying.
When the only employee in your business is you, sure, you can claim you don't hire based on skin colour. lmao.
I do strongly doubt you own any businesses at all given your primary business seems to be spending all day here on various threads defending Nazis and shady characters. lmfao.
Do I really need to cut/paste your comments again so that you stop lying or have you had enough failure for one day?
I just said I hire employees. Where do you get than it's only me? Oh right...it's that ESL problem you have. At least it helped you get a DEI job.
I can spend as much time as I want...that's one of the benefits of owning your own businesses.
They must really cut you a lot of slack at your job because you're a DEI hire spending a lot of his time on here as well.
Go ahead cut and paste them and humiliate yourself.
It will prove what I just said that DEI programs are not "hiring quotas".
Yeah I am not buying that you are "hiring" anyone, so save that lie for another sucker.
By the way if I was a POC, I wouldn't mind being a DEI hire, as it would mean I was hired for my qualifications.
And if I was a DEI hire right now you wouldn't be a crybaby about it anyway.
skoob just never stops, will never admit he's wrong and just keep posting the same thing over and over again.
just like el risitas
I've provided copies of your comments multiple times and you just ignore them. So I'm not going to keep playing into your circle jerk of dysfunction. You want to see them? Then review the posts. They're all there for everyone to see including you.
You were hired as a DEI hire...your skin colour was more qualified than someone else's skin colour.
You have contributed to a racist and biased selection process and you don't even know it.
Aka you lied and are now trying to weasel your way out of your lies.
And if I was hired for my pale skin colour, that is exactly why we need DEI, so that those darker skinned minorities aren't passed over.
Accusing someone of lying when they are not lying is simply a distraction tactic used by someone who knows they have no argument.
Asking proof when that proof has already been provided is simply a stall tactic.
You have no argument.
I'm late to this party, and others may have pointed this out....But, wasn't Trump's mass deportation campaign supposedly targeting the worst of the worst criminal immigrants? Instead, he is going after people who are working and paying taxes. Not gang bangers or drug dealers or rapists. And, it is interesting how he is targeting places like LA instead of, say, a Florida orange plantation or an Iowa slaughterhouse. And, in the past few days, he says he is going to increase sweeps in blue cities like New York and Chicago....while at the same time cutting back on raids at construction sites and hotels....
The point here: He is trying to provoke outrage and maybe this type of violence.
This is all for show. If Trump was serious about deporting ALL illegals, he could easily do it. But, he he's probably been told how ruinous it would be to the US economy to strip out the millions of undocumented workers doing jobs that Americans do not want to do. At least for the wage being paid to the undocumented.
It's interesting that when certain righties get rilled up, they start lashing out in anti-immigrant and borderline racist ways. I wonder why that is...
To Skoob, anyone who has a leadership job and is not white is a DEI hire, apparently.
america first
(trump's father was kkk)
He's doing what he promised to do. Didn't you see the bus loads of illegal immigrants who were gang bangers?
They are targeting people who are in the country illegally. Democrats are trying to stop them. You need to ask yourself why?
No deportation laws are being broken. However officers are being attacked for doing their jobs.
Protests are no longer peaceful and people are looting.
Sanctuary cities that have been promoting the housing of illegal immigrants are obviously more on the radar than other places. Where would you start?
Do you support the law or not?
btw you do know that Obama deported more people than any other president in US history right? But he spoke nicely and kept that under the radar so no cars had to be set on fire.
Why does the lunatic left always resort to violence and vandalism?
Ironically, that's the spin leftists put on things that inevitably backfires on them.
Hire based on qualifications is what I said and you immediately play the race card. Why would you think that those qualified would not include visible minorities?
That's racist.
Why does the terrorist right assassinate (or try to assassinate) political rivals?
Here's the thing: Trump said he was going after the criminals. Is he? At first, he went after the low hanging fruit. But, MAGA (and yourself, apparently) wanted to see more folks get turfed. But, as I've mentioned, he's now going after people who are hardworking. While you might not believe or agree with it, they do the jobs nobody else wants. They pay taxes and are beneficial to the economy. They, despite Trump's bullshit, do not vote for Democrats....or the GOP....because they are not citizens. Hell, I'd rather have a family of undocumented people living beside me than a group of MAGAts.
The protests were mostly peaceful. There are always going to be idiots in any large group, including the police, who fired rubber bullets (at anyone, including reporters doing live TV) and escalated things unnecessarily.
But, answer me this: If Trump was really targeting the undocumented, why is he pulling back from farms, construction sites and slaughterhouses, where WE KNOW huge groups of undocumented people are working? Instead, he's going into factories and what not in blue cities. Is he trying to provoke a response? Did you know that the Nazi's used to hold rallies in neighbourhoods where they were despised, just so they could provoke an angry response and then blame the resulting kerfuffle on the "leftist agitators?" Sort of sounds like ICE/Trump/MAGA are pulling out the good ole playbook.
As for Obama, we all know he deported more people than Trump. What you are missing (shockingly) is that the majority of folks he turfed who had criminal records in the US. He also formalized the process for those caught crossing the border. Before Obama, they were allowed to voluntarily return to Mexico without and repercussions. Meaning they could try again and again until they actually made it in. Obama changed that, and kept a formal record of people so they would know who tried before and permanently barred from entering the US.
Now, I think deporting criminals is supported by all sides. You break the law, you don't deserve to be in the US (or Canada). But, at the same time, there should be due process. This is one of the major issues with these ICE raids, because they were not giving due process to those who got swallowed up in the sweep. Hence, the protests. And, since the righties LOVE to talk about the constitution, habeas corpus is enshrined in both the US and Canadian constitution.
Which I am not doing.
You lied and it is why when I asked you to quote me, you aren't able to.
When Will We Learn?
Fighting windmills via proxies, Netanyahu or Zelensky, is a losing strategy.
Canada announces $4.3-billion in new support for Ukraine and sanctions on Russia’s ‘shadow fleet’
Steven ChaseSenior parliamentary reporter
Kananaskis, alta.
Published 57 minutes agoUpdated 41 minutes ago
55 Comments
Share
Save for later
Give this article
Listen to this article
Prime Minister Mark Carney announced $4.3-billion in new Canadian support for Ukraine and new sanctions targeting the “shadow fleet” of vessels that Russia is using to skirt international trade restrictions.
The measures include $2-billion in military support for Kyiv, including funds for drones, ammunition and armoured vehicles, as well as a $2.3-billion loan to help Ukraine rebuild public infrastructure shattered by years of Russian bombing.
This is Canada’s first substantive support for Ukraine since Mr. Carney became prime minister in March. The Prime Minister’s Office said the money was tucked into Ottawa’s big defence spending hike unveiled earlier this month but not announced until Tuesday.
The “shadow fleet” sanctions follow similar measures unveiled by Britain and the European Union in recent years. These vessels are used sell Russian oil to raise money for Moscow, now into the fourth year of its war on Ukraine.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky came to the summit looking for more help and tougher sanctions on Moscow. Hopes for a united show of support were dashed by Donald Trump who quit the meeting Monday after making another pitch to bring Russia back into the G7 fold.
Mr. Zelensky made his pitch Tuesday morning to other G7 leaders even as Ukraine’s capital of Kyiv recovers from the deadliest attack by Russia in months.
An overnight Russian missile and drone bombardment of Ukraine killed 15 people and injured 156, local officials said Tuesday, with the main barrage demolishing a nine-story Kyiv apartment building in the deadliest attack on the capital this year.
Prime Minister Mark Carney with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during the G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis, in Alberta, on June 17.Suzanne Plunkett/The Associated Press
Mr. Carney expressed sympathy for victims of the latest Russian attack.
“This underscores the importance of staying in total solidarity with Ukraine and the Ukrainian people,” he said.
He said G7 leaders discussed Ukraine Monday night. “We underscored the importance of using maximum pressure against Russia, who has refused to come to the table.”
Mr. Zelensky thanked Mr. Carney for applying the new sanctions and offering additional military support. He called the Russian attack overnight “a big tragedy for” Ukraine.
“Really it was a big attack on civilian infrastructure. On people. Just people, houses.”
Mr. Trump earlier this month suggested peace is not his priority in Ukraine right now and that the two sides may just need to “keep fighting” before a ceasefire is possible.
On Monday, he renewed his pitch to expand the G7.
“I think you wouldn’t have a war right now if you had Russia in,” Mr. Trump said of the Group of Seven. “You spend so much time talking about Russia, and he’s no longer at the table,
Mark Carney appears quite animated when meeting Giorgia. Italy's status in the G7 has risen, it's the conduit for LNG to Europe from North Africa.
