Pride Is Losing Sponsorships

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
28,361
6,254
113
Toronto mayor Olivia Chow has now called for a boycott against Home Depot because they wouldn't support gay pride
 
  • Haha
Reactions: optimusprime69

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,812
2,850
113
:ROFLMAO: I like how you try soooo hard to blame some of us who aren't against gays and stuff.

There's no issue at Pride parade seeing gays kiss even in front of children. If women wanna walk around topless at the parade then have at it even around children long as nobody is being sexual around children (under 10 years old at least). I'll let a pre teen watch or play some violent games but skip certain parts. I also wouldn't let children under 10 watch certain things like how some parents let kids that young play GTA's storyline or let them watch Squid Games. Would I take kids that age to some art show where there's nudity? Sure. Long as it's not sexual art like what's in porn mags.

All you've done in this topic is whine about being okay for kids (under 10) to be exposed to people fucking. You're basically leaning towards saying things like CP is normal and our society should accept it. You're also heavily leaning towards 2 adults being highly sexually with each other while the child is in the same room. In your eyes "sexuality" should be open to kids due to "freedom". You then vent about us Johns being seeing the world in a sex-positive way which we do. I already said you wanna do a parade where people are doing sexual acts in public then have a separate parade where it's known to be adults only. Law enforcement should also make sure kids aren't nearby. No different than underground clubs where people have orgies and stuff. You don't see kids at those clubs and if someone does allow kids there it's only a matter of time before shit hits the fan. Someone already also said bringing a child to a strip club would more than likely get you in a lot of trouble. Are you next going to suggest adults at schools be openly sexually while kids are there too because that's what some adults are doing at Pride. It's the sexual acts and performances where the lines is drawn. A topless lesbian walking around isn't doing anything. Guys walking around with exposed hard on along with sex acts being performed on them while a 7 year old sees it in your eyes is no issue. It's interesting law enforcement let stuff like that slide at Pride for whatever reason, but you go do that any other day and it's indecent exposure along with whatever other charges. That part of the parade has become a cesspool.
Is there really a lot of live sex happening at Pride? I've been a few times and I've seen some nudity and dancing, maybe a little groping, but not actual sex. Am I missing something, or are you guys just repeating second hand tales of one or 2 incidents?????
 
T

toonarmy416

Is there really a lot of live sex happening at Pride? I've been a few times and I've seen some nudity and dancing, maybe a little groping, but not actual sex. Am I missing something, or are you guys just repeating second hand tales of one or 2 incidents?????
I saw on tv. Old men with bitch tits wearing thongs, pounding the roadway like they were fucking right in front of children.
 

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
10,178
10,775
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
I do have a beef about one thing.

Hollywood’s insistence on mainstreaming gays and lesbians.
So guys can have their Willy out shaking it all around on the public streets of Toronto in front of children but Hollywood can make gay scene????

Where is the logic in that?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,785
5,689
113
Since every TV show now features happily married, well adjusted gays and lesbians, if the parade is going to be that tame, why even have it.

The whole idea was to push boundaries when it started.

There are likely still boundaries to be pushed.
The idea was to push for CIVIL RIGHTS. It's purpose was to obtain things like marriage, healthcare(spouse on private insurance), not be fired/discriminated against in the workplace. To not have anti gay laws on the books that were Jim Crow.

Al good things.

Bur sexual orientation, and sexual KINK, are too very different things. KINK is not imo an orientation but in fact a voluntary preference on how you get off, and has nothing to do with who you were born to love.

You can imo place certain community standards on certain behaviors and yes, dress code as well. In public, and especially at publicly funded and advertised as family friendly events.

Imo it hurts the community and the cause when a small subset of exhibitionist become the focal point(as they want) and not the idea of equal rights.
 

bazokajoe

Well-known member
Nov 6, 2010
10,830
9,625
113
The idea was to push for CIVIL RIGHTS. It's purpose was to obtain things like marriage, healthcare(spouse on private insurance), not be fired/discriminated against in the workplace. To not have anti gay laws on the books that were Jim Crow.

Al good things.

Bur sexual orientation, and sexual KINK, are too very different things. KINK is not imo an orientation but in fact a voluntary preference on how you get off, and has nothing to do with who you were born to love.

You can imo place certain community standards on certain behaviors and yes, dress code as well. In public, and especially at publicly funded and advertised as family friendly events.

Imo it hurts the community and the cause when a small subset of exhibitionist become the focal point(as they want) and not the idea of equal rights.
This sums it up perfectly.
Very well said.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts