Who will you be voting for??

[JohnLarue]

Unless the polls are wildly wrong, I dont think he can win.

Even if PP beats Libs by 2 or 3 points, Carney will just form another NDP/Liberal coalition, and thats game over for Conservatives

that only works if the NDP does not get wiped out

As much as Pierre P would hate it, he might be able to team up with the BLOC to form a govt
Perhaps a small price to pay to put a stop to the liberal nightmare

just build a pipeline to Hudson's Bay & several to the west coast

 

[optimusprime69]

Unless the polls are wildly wrong, I dont think he can win.

Even if PP beats Libs by 2 or 3 points, Carney will just form another NDP/Liberal coalition, and thats game over for Conservatives

Sadly, with the help of the CCP it appears Mark Commy will be Canada's first Asian Prime Minister to win an election. A warm welcome to our new overlord.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

It is a close one. I would not surpise me if we are covered in PISS if Pee Pee were to win.

Unless the polls are wildly wrong, I dont think he can win.

Even if PP beats Libs by 2 or 3 points, Carney will just form another NDP/Liberal coalition, and thats game over for Conservatives

Polls cannot be entirely trusted.
I have stopped trusting polls after 2016 when Trump won in a shocker.
But that said, hopefully the polls are right this time. lmao.

 

[squeezer]

Polls cannot be entirely trusted.
I have stopped trusting polls after 2016 when Trump won in a shocker.
But that said, hopefully the polls are right this time. lmao.

Polls are a very good guide, but this one with only a now 3% difference in favor of the Libs has me worried. I've been running to piss everytime I get a the slightest urge and enjoy the flush. I'm trying to jinx Pee Pee in any way I can.

 

[Skoob]

View attachment 432925

Just curious...what exactly do you think Carney will do to save Canada from Trump that no other candidate can or will?

For example, will he punish Trump and move his company back to Canada?

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Polls are a very good guide, but this one with only a now 3% difference in favor of the Libs has me worried. I've been running to piss everytime I get a the slightest urge and enjoy the flush. I'm trying to jinx Pee Pee in any way I can

LOL......squeezie is shitting his pants

It get worse for you, I just learned the polls are done nationally, not for each riding.
That means Carney could win the popular vote, but still lose the election if he doesnt carry the swing ridings

 

[boobtoucher]

LOL......squeezie is shitting his pants

It get worse for you, I just learned the polls are done nationally, not for each riding.
That means Carney could win the popular vote, but still lose the election if he doesnt carry the swing ridings

Anything is possible, but the conservative vote is concentrated in rural areas, which are not seat-dense. Cons winning by 10,000 votes in rural Alberta counts the same as Liberals winning by 1 vote in a GTA riding.

Liberals have better vote efficiency is what I'm saying, so a tie in the popular vote favours the Liberals.

Trudeau lost the popular vote in 2019 and 2021, and got a 184 seat majority with 39.5% of the vote.

 

[JeanGary Diablo]

Polls cannot be entirely trusted.
I have stopped trusting polls after 2016 when Trump won in a shocker.
But that said, hopefully the polls are right this time. lmao.

There's a first time for everything, but 338Canada was founded in 2017 and was nearly spot-on predicting the 2019 and 2021 elections.

Where you have to watch out is the riding polling -- even from 338 it's basically garbage. They use the results of the last election to form the basis of their prediction. Nationally, however, 338 has been very accurate.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

These are the 10 ridings that will most likely decide the election

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/election-ridings-to-watch-toronto-gta-1.7515635

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Just curious...what exactly do you think Carney will do to save Canada from Trump that no other candidate can or will?

He won't empower quislings and won't create a MAGA ideology adjacent government here in Canada.
That is enough to prevent the slippery slope towards fascism, atleast for now.

 

[squeezer]

LOL......squeezie is shitting his pants

It get worse for you, I just learned the polls are done nationally, not for each riding.
That means Carney could win the popular vote, but still lose the election if he doesnt carry the swing ridings

No pant shitting! Unlike Trumpy, I do not need a diaper, yet!!!!

 

[Skoob]

He won't empower quislings and won't create a MAGA ideology adjacent government here in Canada.
That is enough to prevent the slippery slope towards fascism, atleast for now.

I asked what he will do...I didn't ask what he won't do.

So?

Tell us what he will do to combat the big bad US. I'll wait...

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

I asked what he will do...I didn't ask what he won't do.

I told you what he will do.
Let me put it this way and quite simply.
He will stand against MAGA ideology.
What will the glorified sloganeer do?
Shout slogans and suck up to Trump? No thanks.

 

[Skoob]

I told you what he will do.
Let me put it this way and quite simply.
He will stand against MAGA ideology.
What will the glorified sloganeer do?
Shout slogans and suck up to Trump? No thanks.

hahah you can't name one solid policy/platform action he will do that is any different than what Poilievre or any other candidate will do can you?

Just one....go on...I'm waiting.

 

[Skoob]

Polls are a very good guide, but this one with only a now 3% difference in favor of the Libs has me worried. I've been running to piss everytime I get a the slightest urge and enjoy the flush. I'm trying to jinx Pee Pee in any way I can.

What are you so afraid of?
Regardless if Carney or Poilievre wins, the policies are almost identical.

The only thing you need to come to terms with is who of the two will actually keep their promises vs calling them "stretch goals".

 

[squeezer]

What are you so afraid of?
Regardless if Carney or Poilievre wins, the policies are almost identical.

The only thing you need to come to terms with is who of the two will actually keep their promises vs calling them "stretch goals".

One is a "Trump Lite" professional politician who has never worked a day in the private sector; the other is an accomplished financial wizard and businessman.


One delivered coffee and donuts to a twat mob occupying a Canadian city; the other helped save financial sectors and is internationally recognized for his intelligence and exceptional business acumen.


How anyone could lump the two together is simply astounding.

 

[squeezer]

hahah you can't name one solid policy/platform action he will do that is any different than what Poilievre or any other candidate will do can you?

Just one....go on...I'm waiting.

Let me show you AI's unbiased response to your silly question, have a read Scoob if you dare


Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre would approach Trump very differently, mainly because they have fundamentally different styles, experiences, and worldviews.


Here’s a breakdown:

	Mark Carney	Pierre Poilievre
Background	Global banker, ex-Governor of Bank of Canada and Bank of England. Internationally connected.	Career politician. Populist, anti-elite messaging.
Style	Polished, diplomatic, technocratic. Focus on global cooperation.	Combative, populist, blunt. Focus on national sovereignty.
Approach to Trump	Likely cautious, professional. Would avoid open confrontation, emphasize stability, alliances, markets.	Likely more aggressive, populist to populist. Would frame Trump as either an ally in fighting "the elites" or attack Trumpian chaos if it suited him.
On Trade (eg. NAFTA)	Would stress the importance of stable trade relations and use institutional channels to protect Canadian interests.	Would be aggressive on "Canada First" terms. Might align with Trump if it meant pushing protectionist policies.
On Foreign Policy	Very multilateral — would try to work around Trump through G7, G20, etc.	Would likely be more transactional — deal directly, less worried about international optics.
Personal Demeanor	Cool, professional, appeals to global elites and moderate voters.	Fiery, appeals to populists, libertarians, and people angry at the status quo.

In short:

• Carney would treat Trump carefully, almost like managing a risky financial asset — respectful publicly, maneuvering behind the scenes.
• Poilievre would either align with Trump's populism when it’s useful or openly fight Trump if it gave him a domestic political advantage.

The bigger difference:
Carney is much more globalist and institutional — he sees Canada’s success as tied to international systems.
Poilievre is more nationalist and anti-institutional — he sees Canada’s success as tied to autonomy and breaking up elite control.

 

[Insidious Von]

Skooby Doo.

I would tell you what Mark Carney is working on, it might cause you to spread out like the King of Kings.

As for my ridings:

Vaughan - Woodbridge Liberal
Vaughan - King Conservative

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

hahah you can't name one solid policy/platform action he will do that is any different than what Poilievre or any other candidate will do can you?

There is plenty that is different.
Pierre promises to cut taxes, cut spending and deregulate and put money in the pockets of the rich while throwing the average Canadian as well as Canada itself under the bus.
Carney proposes to invest in Canada, build more houses, make it more self-reliant, something that will help us be less dependent on the US for while maintaining sovereignty.
I have said many times that this election is not about policy.
This is about ideology.
We need to elect a government that is ideologically opposed to the fascist one in the US.
That is priority #1.
Everything else is secondary.
That government is one that is led by Liberals.