So once again you are saying it's okay to kill immigrants (if they're Jews). Fucking pathetic.
Hamas releases 3 hostages amid uncertainty over ceasefire deal
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
More of your stupidity. Phase 1 is over. Hamas has rejected phase 2 and refuses to extend phase 1.
The people killed at the music festival were largely killed by Israel using the Hannibal directive.
Hamas didn't have weapons that could do this kind of destruction.
Do you know how unhinged you look when you call the UN Rapporteur a 'rando'?
I see, so you think its ok to kill people who break into your house unless they are 'immigrants' or a different religion?
Which makes the Israeli illegal occupation of Palestine and genocide just that much worse.
Your belief in racial supremacy is so incredibly blatant when you make it that clear that you think this logic only applies to zionists.
These dolts don’t have a clue about using the phrase correctly.
Oh, you mean Israel was right to kill Hamas fighters who attacked them on the 7th?
You are once again claiming that it is okay to attack legal immigrants who legally bought property.
She's not a rando, she's a self avowed anti-semite, at least according to her own claims thinks jews have subjugated America.
Other than endorsing your anti-Jew hatred, what legitimacy do the people you quoted in the previous post, "Khalissee" and Mr Shehada have?
Ah, so you think Palestinians are within their rights to kill anyone who breaks into occupied Palestine.
How can you be 'legal immigrants' to another country that is illegally occupied?
Did Palestinians grant them immigrant status?
There is sure is a lot of goy hatred in that post.
You back genocide, nobody can be more filled with hate than someone who defends and works for genocide.
Every accusation is a confession.An accusation of what? Dolts don’t have a clue about using the phrase correctly
Time to talk about free speech.
First a bit of history, where its argued that attempts to block free speech didn't allow the nazi party to rise, not stopping violent resistance did.
– As comparisons between contemporary American politics and the rise of the Nazi Party are frequently invoked in the media, it’s crucial to draw one specific lesson from the history of Weimar Germany, the democratic state that existed from 1918 to 1933. The rise of Hitler and the Nazis was not the result of Weimar’s failure to punish hate speech. Instead, it was the futile attempt to suppress such speech while not acting effectively to curb political violence that allowed the Nazis to rise and gain power.
During the Nazis’ rise, there were laws in place that criminalized hate speech. In the fifteen years leading up to Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor in 1933, for example, more than 200 legal prosecutions were initiated in response to antisemitic speech and hundreds of Nazi-affiliated newspapers were shut down. Hitler himself was banned from speaking in several German states from 1925 to 1927, while prominent Nazi figures were sentenced to prison.
Now we have trump blocking free speech.
"Free speech" warrior Trump announces "unlawful" assault on college protests
"The goal here seems to be intimidation and fear to chill free speech," ex-prosecutor warns
Again its labelled as blocking 'antisemitic' speech but its geared towards stopping all protests agains the Palestinian genocide.
Even RFK jr has joined in, declaring its a public health issue.
First a bit of history, where its argued that attempts to block free speech didn't allow the nazi party to rise, not stopping violent resistance did.
– As comparisons between contemporary American politics and the rise of the Nazi Party are frequently invoked in the media, it’s crucial to draw one specific lesson from the history of Weimar Germany, the democratic state that existed from 1918 to 1933. The rise of Hitler and the Nazis was not the result of Weimar’s failure to punish hate speech. Instead, it was the futile attempt to suppress such speech while not acting effectively to curb political violence that allowed the Nazis to rise and gain power.
During the Nazis’ rise, there were laws in place that criminalized hate speech. In the fifteen years leading up to Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor in 1933, for example, more than 200 legal prosecutions were initiated in response to antisemitic speech and hundreds of Nazi-affiliated newspapers were shut down. Hitler himself was banned from speaking in several German states from 1925 to 1927, while prominent Nazi figures were sentenced to prison.
Now we have trump blocking free speech.
"Free speech" warrior Trump announces "unlawful" assault on college protests
"The goal here seems to be intimidation and fear to chill free speech," ex-prosecutor warns
Again its labelled as blocking 'antisemitic' speech but its geared towards stopping all protests agains the Palestinian genocide.
Even RFK jr has joined in, declaring its a public health issue.
Your racism has you constantly contradicting yourself. You have said (pretended) you support a Two State peace based on the '67 lines. On the 7th, Hamas were the ones breaking in to Israel.
And I know you post so much trash all day that you can't remember what you are talking about but you were saying legal Jewish immigrants under the Ottomans and Brits justified Arab/Palestinian leaders inciting mob violence against indigenous Jews.
In her own words, she said Jews have "subjugated" America. She is a fucking racist and you love her for it.
And your other "sources" are just idiotic randos but you hang on their every word simply because they support your anti-Jew crusade.
Because every other argument is exposing your irrationality and obsessive hatred and need to change the topic?
