update - more ass beatings for the Orange Fuckus

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,084
2,578
113
That's right, Dutchie.

It's a plot and all the judges are in on it. šŸ¤”
You don't need a conspiracy for people to simply act in their own self interest. Is it a conspiracy that most people go to a grocery store to buy food? A conspiracy when mass numbers of sports fans use the washroom at the stadium all at the same time? To borrow a term from Frank Zappa, you libs have plooked the crap out of any meaning the word conspiracy ever had.

If you hadn't become a lawyer surely you'd have become the Wizard of Oz - "Don't look behind that curtain!"! LOL!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
78,388
96,260
113
You don't need a conspiracy for people to simply act in their own self interest. Is it a conspiracy that most people go to a grocery store to buy food? A conspiracy when mass numbers of sports fans use the washroom at the stadium all at the same time? To borrow a term from Frank Zappa, you libs have plooked the crap out of any meaning the word conspiracy ever had.

If you hadn't become a lawyer surely you'd have become the Wizard of Oz - "Don't look behind that curtain!"! LOL!
All the judges are in 1 big conspiracy to be mean to your hero, Trump??...... šŸ˜¹
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
78,388
96,260
113


The Associated Press sued three Trump administration officials Friday over access to presidential events, citing freedom of speech in asking a federal judge to stop the blocking of its journalists.

The lawsuit was filed Friday afternoon in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., 10 days after the White House began restricting access to the news agency.

The AP says its case is about an unconstitutional effort by the White House to control speech ā€” in this case not changing its style from the Gulf of Mexico to the ā€œGulf of America,ā€ as President Donald Trump did last month with an executive order.

ā€œThe press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government,ā€ the AP said in its lawsuit, which names White House chief of staff Susan Wiles, deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich and press secretary Karoline Leavitt.

ā€œThis targeted attack on the APā€™s editorial independence and ability to gather and report the news strikes at the very core of the First Amendment,ā€ the news agency said. ā€œThis court should remedy it immediately.ā€

Article continues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
78,388
96,260
113


WASHINGTON (AP) ā€” The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily kept on the job the head of the federal agency that protects government whistleblowers, in its first word on the many legal fights over President Donald Trump's second-term agenda.

The justices said in an unsigned order that Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, could remain in his job at least until Wednesday. That's when a lower-court order temporarily protecting him expires.

With a bare majority of five justices, the high court neither granted nor rejected the administration's plea to immediately remove him. Instead, the court held the request in abeyance, noting that the order expires in just a few days.


U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has scheduled a Wednesday hearing over whether to extend her order keeping Dellinger in his post. The justices could return to the case depending on what she decides.

Conservative justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito sided with the administration, doubting whether courts have the authority to restore to office someone the president has fired. Acknowledging that some presidentially appointed officials have contested their removal, Gorsuch wrote that ā€œthose officials have generally sought remedies like backpay, not injunctive relief like reinstatement.ā€

Liberal justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson would have rejected the administration's request.

The conservative-dominated court has previously taken a robust view of presidential power, including in last yearā€™s decision that gave presidents immunity from prosecution for actions they take in office.


The Justice Department employed sweeping language in urging the court to allow the termination of the head of an obscure federal agency with limited power. Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris wrote in court papers that the lower court had crossed ā€œa constitutional red lineā€ by blocking Dellingerā€™s firing and stopping Trump ā€œfrom shaping the agenda of an executive-branch agency in the new administrationā€™s critical first days.ā€

The Office of Special Counsel is responsible for guarding the federal workforce from illegal personnel actions, such as retaliation for whistleblowing. Its leader ā€œmay be removed by the president only for inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.ā€

Dellinger was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden and confirmed by the Senate to a five-year term in 2024.

ā€œI am glad to be able to continue my work as an independent government watchdog and whistleblower advocate," Dellinger said in a statement. ā€œI am grateful to the judges and justices who have concluded that I should be allowed to remain on the job while the courts decide whether my office can retain a measure of independence from direct partisan and political control.ā€
 
Toronto Escorts