They are not lowered.Not if qualification requirements have to be significantly lowered to accommodate.
They are not lowered.Not if qualification requirements have to be significantly lowered to accommodate.
if as you say, their qualifications are at least as good. then they are not receiving equality of opportunity and that is a just and worth while objective to strive forWhich is not possible when generation after generation of blacks cannot achieve the same prosperity.
Dependency on quotas for advancement is a self fulfilling nightmare.Is this a problem that the blacks have created for themselves?
It exists sure, in all countries , all societies to one extent or anotherSuch as racial discrimination. Do you feel it exists in the US or not?
I her case it was...if all the democrats pick or go through primary..they chose her because of her gender and color...the amarricans are tired of the DEI systemYou think that DEI applies to candidates of political parties? That is not an example.
DEI doesn't fix it either...and also makes a program, company mediocre for putting anyone in charge with "good enough" skills instead of the best...Morgan Freeman was wrong.
You cannot fix issues by sweeping it under the rug.
DEI attempts to fix it.DEI doesn't fix it either...and also makes a program, company mediocre for putting anyone in charge with "good enough" skills instead of the best...
I agree with you... qualifications should be top priority...not DEI....you should get the job because you're capable not because you belong to a certain demographic..DEI attempts to fix it.
And it does not make anything mediocre.
Qualifications and DEI are unrelated.
That is what happens even today....you should get the job because you're capable not because you belong to a certain demographic..
It doesn't... you don't need some made up acronym to get the most capable people. You just need to see the qualifications, experience and capabilities...it should not be based on gender, color of skin or sexual preference.That is what happens even today.
DEI does not preclude prioritizing qualifications.
They co-exist.
It is not based on race, gender or sexual orientation...it should not be based on gender, color of skin or sexual preference.
It is telling that the same people who are against DEI always avoid hiring from minorities.It is not based on race, gender or sexual orientation.
It is based on people with required qualifications chosen from minority groups.
They dont realize they are basically saying that minorities are not talented or skilled.It is telling that the same people who are against DEI always avoid hiring from minorities.
That's the entire point of DEI, so that the present preference for one demographic doesn't just give that one demographic the best jobs.I agree with you... qualifications should be top priority...not DEI....you should get the job because you're capable not because you belong to a certain demographic..