maybe to you...not for the Americans...i'm sure you didn't even vote for Trump or Kamala...LoLNo.
Those policies of his are unnecessary.
They are solutions in search of a problem.
maybe to you...not for the Americans...i'm sure you didn't even vote for Trump or Kamala...LoLNo.
Those policies of his are unnecessary.
They are solutions in search of a problem.
they are illegal the minute they enter the country illegallyNo.
Asylum Seekers are legal from the point of application for asylum.
This is what I explained just the other day and you are back to square one.
When they sit down for the credible fear screening interview, they are legal because they are submitting their documentation for a legal immigration process.
When I say "accepted" it is that their application is accepted to be heard in immigration court, and not that their petition is approved.
Once accepted and while in waiting, some of these people are released (which is what they call "catch and release").
The others stay in immigration detention.
The ones who are released can apply for social security card, work without employment authorization.
These are all legal provisions even before their case is approved by immigration court.
So yes, they are legal from the point of application for asylum.
your illegals are walking over the boarder and crying asylum to jump a head of the thousands / millions who submitted their application legally.Itsgood enough.
Who does he think will fire missiles at him?Trump signs executive order to develop American-made ‘Iron Dome’ missile shield
The USDA attributed the rise in egg costs to the highly pathogenic avian influenza, or bird flu, outbreak,How much are eggs currently?
better safe than sorry...Who does he think will fire missiles at him?
Um, if everytime the police catch an illegal committing a crime, and instead of releasing them, they just turn them over to ICE, then that is pretty simple no?It`s too complicated to remove only the criminals. And it won`t make noise.
No, we don't "just" have to go with reported crime. Here in Canada it was discovered that the TamilnTigers were extorting Sri Lankan immigrants for the war back home. It was fairly widespread, and yes in many instances unreported.That is true of crime in general.
We dont know what we don't know and we cannot make assertions on things we don't know about.
We have to go with reported crime.
So it was reported that the SL community was being extorted by the Tamil Tigers.No, we don't "just" have to go with reported crime. Here in Canada it was discovered that the TamilnTigers were extorting Sri Lankan immigrants for the war back home. It was fairly widespread, and yes in many instances unreported.
And this was within the LEGAL immigrant community.
So it doesn't just affect other illegals. And yes, going after organized gangs is something you do, you don't ignore it just because it's within a minority community.
Eventually yes, but it was years after. The point being it wasn't in the statistics. But it can be inferred. So imo it's a disingenuous argument. Law enforcement and Governments know it occurs, so to use it as a POLITICAL argument to increase immigration and allow illegal immigrants and not deport them when caught doing crimes(which was the primary policy of sanctuary cities) is hypocritical and a lie.So it was reported that the SL community was being extorted by the Tamil Tigers.
If something is reported, you know.
If something is unreported, you dont know.
The DoJ reports, that migrants commit less crime than citizens.
As the top law enforcement agency, they are the authority on this.
You assertion to the contrary while admitting that a) you dont know b) it is unreported c) you have no evidence to challenge the DoJ report, is not convincing.
You are saying that you have a notion that they could be committing crime that is unreported because they are migrants.
That doesn't make sense.
Are you really that stupid ?Who does he think will fire missiles at him?
I think it would be good for Canada as well. Canada can get out of its Eurosclerosis-style funk.It seems like people in the USA deserve America to be Great Again.
It is common knowledge that a lot of crimes go unreported even amongst citizens.Eventually yes, but it was years after. The point being it wasn't in the statistics. But it can be inferred. So imo it's a disingenuous argument. Law enforcement and Governments know it occurs, so to use it as a POLITICAL argument to increase immigration and allow illegal immigrants and not deport them when caught doing crimes(which was the primary policy of sanctuary cities) is hypocritical and a lie.
People know when things are shittier.
Defense spending is not a big percentage of government spending as it was in decades past. The absolute size of the U.S. defense budget has heft because of the size of the U.S. economy.They do deserve that. The problem, however, is not illegal immigrants, but a debt of $37T , caused by imperial overreach.
No signs Trump will address the real problems.
Yep. Nothing surges a nation forward better than $400 insulin and medical care-related bankruptcies. And women being jailed for getting life-saving abortions. MAGA!I think it would be good for Canada as well. Canada can get out of its Eurosclerosis-style funk.
I bet CNN's Kate Bolduan would be great in the sack. I'm not sure I would want her around after that.
The CNN host can't believe it, lol.....The is gold.
In fairness, sometimes Jalimon just gets things scrambled in his head.This is why the left is losing.
Nobody believes your lies anymore.
That's a new way to dismiss Democracy and the Electorate that I have never seen before.We don't give a fucking fuck about Trump's popularity. For fuck sake it's not a pageant show!
Frankly, undoing the Biden madness is the easy part. It will get more challenging and there will be public push back on some of his agenda.A leader that gets rid of illegal immigrants and has companies focused on innovating instead of DEI quotas?
Ready?It is common knowledge that a lot of crimes go unreported even amongst citizens.
So the same rule would apply to citizens as well.
So in the end it would still hold true that although there are unreported crimes in both populations, the migrant community commits less of them.
Crimes rates have never been used to increase immigration.
Crimes rates have usually been cited as a response to harmful narratives that immigrants are criminals pushed by the likes of MAGA.
The primary purpose of sanctuary cities was not to prevent deportations for violent crimes, but to prevent arrests only on the basis of their illegal status.
If they committed violent crime they can and are arrested and deported even if they are in a sanctuary city.
This has always been the case.
Again, this is a lie pushed by MAGA that sanctuary cities are "harbouring dangerous criminals" as a matter of policy.