Liberals Ban Hundreds More Types of Firearms

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,528
6,733
113
Goes on one fake hunting trip, thinks he has the "pulse" of Canadians and still can't answer why law enforcement "need" semi-autos for themselves if they're allegedly so "inferior" and dangerous.

:rolleyes:
Thanks for taking the time to try and refute my arguments. I'm learning so much from you :devilish:


p.s. Law enforcement use them to kill violent suspects, something not within the bounds of Canadian law for civilians. You 'law abiding' gun owners could maybe benefit by looking up the laws you think you are abiding by.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,528
6,733
113
Really? Tampon Tim is a hero of yours?
Not a hero but yes, he absolutely did things I agree with during his tenure as governor.

Is this just another case where you instinctively hate a frequent gun user because he is on the 'other' side?
 

Bucktee

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2024
767
1,062
93
Not a hero but yes, he absolutely did things I agree with during his tenure as governor.

Is this just another case where you instinctively hate a frequent gun user because he is on the 'other' side?
Neither you nor Walz are frequent gun users, so no, that's not a reason for any reaction.
 

cunning linguist

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2009
1,626
78
48
Thanks for taking the time to try and refute my arguments. I'm learning so much from you :devilish:
I've already shown you articles of Government using their rifles to "rapidly assault" wounded wildlife in the past. You don't seem to do a good job of retaining information, perhaps you're too busy inventing hunting trips in your mind.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,528
6,733
113
I've already shown you articles of Government using their rifles to "rapidly assault" wounded wildlife in the past. You don't seem to do a good job of retaining information, perhaps you're too busy inventing hunting trips in your mind.
Are you missing the part of it being the government, not civilians? You might as well be arguing that because the government owns F-35s, so should we.
 
Last edited:

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,528
6,733
113
Neither you nor Walz are frequent gun users, so no, that's not a reason for any reaction.
So we aren't allowed an opinion?

As it is, the only argument being put forward is semi-auto long guns are needed to put down injured animals which would only apply for people incapable of charging a bolt.
 

cunning linguist

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2009
1,626
78
48
Are you missing the part of it being the government, not civilians? You might as well be arguing that because the government owns F-35s, so should we.
Yeah, I've previously noted that you hold Liberal governments to lower standards.

Semi-auto was the compromise. But now we have 9mm carbines, .22 plinkers and hunting rifles on the list.

Rules for thee, not for me, am I right?
 

cunning linguist

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2009
1,626
78
48
So we aren't allowed an opinion?

As it is, the only argument being put forward is semi-auto long guns are needed to put down injured animals which would only apply for people incapable of charging a bolt.
Funny how Conservation Officers are issued "assault rifles". They must be so busy "assaulting" wounded deer and coyotes.
 
Toronto Escorts