No.
Stats are that Manhattan was far more dangerous in the 90's, due to the crack epidemic. You simply have the facts wrong.
Trump claims he will overturn the 14th Amendment
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
Stats are that Manhattan was far more dangerous in the 90's, due to the crack epidemic. You simply have the facts wrong.
Broken windows theory - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Here you go, bud. An actual article which disproves your garbage.
According to a 2001 study of crime trends in New York City by Kelling and William Sousa, rates of both petty and serious crime fell significantly after the aforementioned policies were implemented. Furthermore, crime continued to decline for the following ten years. Such declines suggested that policies based on the Broken Windows Theory were effective.[24] Later, in 2016, Brian Jordan Jefferson used the precedent of Kelling and Sousa's study to conduct fieldwork in the 70th precinct of New York City, which it was corroborated that crime mitigation in the area were concerning "quality of life" issues, which included noise complaints and loitering.[25] The falling crime rates throughout New York City had built a mutual relationship between residents and law enforcement in vigilance of disorderly conduct.[citation needed]
However, other studies do not find a cause and effect relationship between the adoption of such policies and decreases in crime.[5][26] The decrease may have been part of a broader trend across the United States. The rates of most crimes, including all categories of violent crime, made consecutive declines from their peak in 1990, under Giuliani's predecessor, David Dinkins. Other cities also experienced less crime, even though they had different police policies. Other factors, such as the 39% drop in New York City's unemployment rate between 1992 and 1999,[27] could also explain the decrease reported by Kelling and Sousa.[27]
A 2017 study found that when the New York Police Department (NYPD) stopped aggressively enforcing minor legal statutes in late 2014 and early 2015 that civilian complaints of three major crimes (burglary, felony assault, and grand larceny) decreased (slightly with large error bars) during and shortly after sharp reductions in proactive policing. There was no statistically significant effect on other major crimes such as murder, rape, robbery, or grand theft auto. These results are touted as challenging prevailing scholarship as well as conventional wisdom on authority and legal compliance by implying that aggressively enforcing minor legal statutes incites more severe criminal acts.[28]
Buddy, I rode the subway last week and there was a crazy guy evil-eyeing everybody and muttering. Same shit is everywhere and always has been.
Hey righties!!!!
Here's a rightie editorial cartoon from the McKinley era when all you people hated Italians, not Latinos.
Here's a rightie editorial cartoon from the McKinley era when all you people hated Italians, not Latinos.
To your point:
There are many reasons why New Yorkers voted for Trump in record numbers.
That's because your an asshole and nothing to do with crime penis Parker. In fact you would get punched out anywhere because of your idiotic views
Ya I watched home alone 2 new York and seen exactly what you are babbling about lol
I call bullshit on that one - you don't have any friends
Question for the Trump lovers of Terb: Are you happy with the cast of incompetent whackos he's appointed to his team so far? REALLY?
Biden is running the United States. And Harris is acting as VP. Why, have you heard differently?
Did they? Are you so sure? I mean, the US/Canadian border wasn't very secure in the 1880s. Nor was the southern border. And do you think they had immigration at all the different ports up and down the coast? And, to be frank, there was nearly no screening process back then. They didn't have social security numbers or things like that.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! That's a good one! Thanks!
The question makes no sense...he hasn't appointed any incompetent whackos...you must be thinking of the current administration.
Unless of course you're doing the "Left thing" where you attack people's character in a bully fashion while portraying yourself as a "tolerant liberal"?
So rather than demonizing people you don't like for shallow reasons, how about judging them on the job they do over the next 4 years and let the voting public decide their fate? Just like the current administration's fate was decided last month?
The US had open borders and used immigration to build up a population that could capitalize on the land they had, build their economy, etc. It was a good thing.
It wasn't until the 1890's that the feds even had immigration laws and rejection criteria. If you could get to north america, pay a head tax and did not hit certain undesirable criteria (easy), you were in. (Current idiots should breathe a sigh of relief.)
That the following classes of aliens shall be excluded from admission into the United States, in accordance with the existing acts regulating immigration, other than those concerning Chinese laborers: All idiots, insane persons, paupers or persons likely to become a public charge, persons suffering from a loathsome or a dangerous contagious disease, persons who have been convicted of a felony or other infamous crime or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, polygamists, and also any person whose ticket or passage is paid for with the money of another or who is assisted by others to come . . . .
The borders remained very open until after the first world war.
All the money from Europe built the USA during wwi and wwii. No world wars and non-American superpower
If we kick out all the trans your moms going to have to spend a fortune on kleenex and hand lotion
Is that your new bathhouse moniker kc ? I would think queen cuckold would be more fitting
Well the category of "idiots" probably applied to Trump's ancestors, given how dumb he is.
