The fbi keeps statistics. They use the same methodology. They liaise with locals.
House easily could flip, the Senate is a whole other story. Most of the at risk Senate seats are Blue ones. These are from the 2020 election.
No, you’re incorrect. In this case the data from this administration is manipulated to their benefit. New York, LA, Chicago are in shambles. Drugged out people in alleyways while South Americans with ponchos walk the streets aimlessly throughout the day. It really is a bizarre sight.
Those are anecdotes. You've put forth a conspiracy theory about manipulated numbers. I lived in NYC and there a lot on biz along with SF and yes, there are shitty areas, so you're right on tha5. But no, walking midtown is not bad. If you watch Fox any bad event in these major cities is played ad infinitum. My SF friends say avoid the tenderloin and the rest of the city is fine. Same w Seattle etc. But the right wing media is as bad or even worse than others at spinning anecdotes into systematic facts.
No.
en.wikipedia.org
Did I say 90’s? I didn’t.
This is just garbage. I am talking about post Covid Manhattan in the year 2024.Broken windows theory - Wikipedia
Here you go, bud. An actual article which disproves your garbage.
According to a 2001 study of crime trends in New York City by Kelling and William Sousa, rates of both petty and serious crime fell significantly after the aforementioned policies were implemented. Furthermore, crime continued to decline for the following ten years. Such declines suggested that policies based on the Broken Windows Theory were effective.[24] Later, in 2016, Brian Jordan Jefferson used the precedent of Kelling and Sousa's study to conduct fieldwork in the 70th precinct of New York City, which it was corroborated that crime mitigation in the area were concerning "quality of life" issues, which included noise complaints and loitering.[25] The falling crime rates throughout New York City had built a mutual relationship between residents and law enforcement in vigilance of disorderly conduct.[citation needed]
However, other studies do not find a cause and effect relationship between the adoption of such policies and decreases in crime.[5][26] The decrease may have been part of a broader trend across the United States. The rates of most crimes, including all categories of violent crime, made consecutive declines from their peak in 1990, under Giuliani's predecessor, David Dinkins. Other cities also experienced less crime, even though they had different police policies. Other factors, such as the 39% drop in New York City's unemployment rate between 1992 and 1999,[27] could also explain the decrease reported by Kelling and Sousa.[27]
A 2017 study found that when the New York Police Department (NYPD) stopped aggressively enforcing minor legal statutes in late 2014 and early 2015 that civilian complaints of three major crimes (burglary, felony assault, and grand larceny) decreased (slightly with large error bars) during and shortly after sharp reductions in proactive policing. There was no statistically significant effect on other major crimes such as murder, rape, robbery, or grand theft auto. These results are touted as challenging prevailing scholarship as well as conventional wisdom on authority and legal compliance by implying that aggressively enforcing minor legal statutes incites more severe criminal acts.[28]
Buddy, I rode the subway last week and there was a crazy guy evil-eyeing everybody and muttering. Same shit is everywhere and always has been.
There seems to be a muzzling of the law in western counties lately. Also, it’s not people evil eying and muttering that is the problem. People in the subway are getting threatened and physically attacked by these deranged people.
That's because your an asshole and nothing to do with crime penis Parker. In fact you would get punched out anywhere because of your idiotic views
Ya I watched home alone 2 new York and seen exactly what you are babbling about lol
